Something Other Than God By Jennifer Fulwiler: An Analysis

784 Words2 Pages

In the book, “Something Other Than God” by Jennifer Fulwiler, the author and main character, Jennifer, talks about her atheist background and how her opinion as she ages changes. Jennifer grew up atheist in a heavy Catholicism influenced town, and she completely rejected God. She talks about different experiences of religion being forced upon her and how uncomfortable she felt. She also mentions that was she was almost unable to be friends with Catholics. As she grows up she continues to feel this way, until she is a young adult. One day she feels the need to read about Catholicism. Fascinated, she continues researching, blogging, reading, and talking about the faith. Then she talks about what she discovers and some issues she has with the …show more content…

She saw God’s presence in her life. She began to welcome God into her life by reading the Bible, she said, “I flipped my book open and looked up verses myself” (88). This allowed Jennifer to understand the Catholic faith, and she became more aware of God’s way in her life. Eventually, Jennifer began a blog to discuss her questions and confusions about Catholicism, “And this time, I hit publish” (104). Discussing the faith with others allowed Jennifer to have more knowledge about the faith and become more open minded.
Later, Jennifer changed her daily practices in order to strengthen her relationship with God. She was extremely hesitant at first but eventually decided to attend mass, “We managed to make it through the doors without any Atheist detector sirens going off” (117). Attending mass regularly allowed her to become closer to God, which led Jennifer to join RCIA. This made her a member of the Catholic Church. Jennifer changed her practices to open up more to God’s presence in her …show more content…

She did not agree with the Church’s stance, “then the anti-abortion stance is not only offensive, but it’s illogical. An all-good God wouldn’t oppose freedom” (123). Jennifer was unclear why the Church would take away human rights. She felt that the women should have say whether or not abortion is the best answer since it is her body. She was aggravated during this section of the book because her husband, Joe understood where the Catholic Church was coming from and she was in disbelief.
I agree with Jennifer’s stance on abortion. I do not believe it is right for the Catholic Church to be telling women that they must keep their baby. It is a personal choice, and women are given the freedom to make their own decision. I am not saying that everyone should get an abortion, but if a woman was raped for example, she should not have to keep that child. That child may be difficult for the women to cope with and may even be neglected. I do not believe the Church has the ability to take away rights for

Open Document