Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human reproductive rights and ethics
The issue with reproductive rights
Eminent domain as a necessary evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human reproductive rights and ethics
A. Eminent Domain is defined as “the power to take private property for public use by a state, municipality, or private person or corporation authorized to exercise functions of public character, following the payment of just compensation to the owner of that property” (Farlex, par. 1). Eminent domain has a long and distinguished legal history, dating back to the Magna Carta. The term “eminent domain” was coined by Hugo Grotius (1583–1645), a Dutch jurist and philosophe, to describe the power of the state over natural property (Dalton, par. 3). This legal process has been used in many nations ostensibly for the “greater good.” Recently, Russia has come onto the world stage as abusing the power of eminent domain in preparation for the 2014 Olympic Games, as has Brazil in regards to the World Cup and upcoming 2016 Olympic Games. They, like many nations, have been accused of not giving just compensation for property taken. World-wide, eminent domain and it abuse of have been increasing as the world’s population and economy change. Author Tit Elingtin writes “The governments have taken advantage of that eminent domain ruling, and you, the media, have failed at protecting citizens” (Elingtin par. 13). This quotation reflects many people’s opinions today. Many believe that governments abuse the power they are given with eminent domain and call on the United Nations to remove the problem.
B. The Holy See is the episcopal jurisdiction of the Catholic Church in Rome. Its leader, the Pope, or Bishop of Rome, resides in Vatican City. Vatican City is a landlocked sovereign city-state whose territory consists of a walled enclave within the city of Rome. Issues of eminent domain have been problematic in Vatican City’s history, as it is located...
... middle of paper ...
...ly condemned to be aborted, has the face of the Lord" (Pope Francis, pars. 2-4). This being said, the Holy See suggests the implementation of Natural Family Planning services across the world to give a safer alternative to contraceptives and abortion. The Holy See also would like to see governments supporting and helping improve the adoption process to lessen the strain places on expecting mothers, especially in cases of rape or incest. Counseling should also be made available for all abuse victims, regardless of gender, so that such drastic measures can be avoided. Reproductive health is a very prevalent topic in our ever changing world, but the Catholic Church stands firm in its belief to spread peace and love throughout the world. The aforementioned contraceptive practices, other than NFP, go against the Magisterium’s beliefs and therefore will not be supported.
There are many different beliefs floating around Christian as well as secular circles as to what it means to be “pro-life”. Some claim that this view equates all forms of contraception to abortion while others claim that to be “pro-life” one must only be against abortion. In his book The Pro-Life/Choice Debate, Mark Herring summarizes the Humanae Vitae, a document released by Pope Paul VI in the late 1960s, saying “it warns against using contraceptives and engaging in sexual relations for their own sake…” The stance that will be taken in this paper will be that to be “pro-life” is to be against abortion and not contraception. Equating all forms of contraception to that of abortion is an ill-founded and uneducated claim that does more to hurt the perception and potential power of the pro-life movement than it does to help it. It allows the discussion to veer far off the path, as can be seen in Christina Page’s book How the Pro-Choice Movemen...
One of these ethical issues is regarding the use of fertility drugs. These drugs such as Pergonal, can trigger ovulation and increase the production of eggs which will increase a woman’s chances of conception. Often, these fertility drugs escalate the chances of multiple births that can lead to possible risk for both the mother and fetuses. Possible risk for carrying more than one fetus includes premature birth; long periods of hospital stays after birth as well as a higher risk one or more of these children will have some kind of serious disability or brain damage. In Greg Pence’s essay “The McCaughey Septuplets: God’s Will or Human Choice?” Pence says “the human uterus did not emerge in evolution to bear litters and that large multiple births are unnatural” (87). Doctors often recommend “selective reduction” (88) of all but a couple of the embryos to reduce the risk to the mother and fetus however many mothers refuse instead believing that the end results are “God’s will”. He makes a good point saying if it were “God’s will” then there would be “no need for fertility...
In short, disestablishment is the most literal form of separation of Church and State; it prohibited the state from funding or establishing a religion. This was a continuation of the fight for the freedom on conscience. James Madison was very influential in this fight, “Religion was not invented by human policy” thus he argued that it should never be subjected to human policy (Maddison, 120). Maddison expresses that a person’s religion is to be determined by his own conviction and conscience, “and it is the right of every man to exercise it” (Maddison, 118). Freedom of religion, the first amendment, existed before disestablishment, but in it’s entirety was dependent on disestablishment. Establishment was achieved through imposing taxes on
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
... middle of paper ... ... But as long as the Church and State have anything to do with one another, the struggle will continue. Bibliography:..
April 19, 2018. 2007. The 'Se Rahman, Anika. A.S. & Co. A Global Review of Laws on Induced Abortion, International Family Planning.
As one knows, some unwanted pregnancies could often be harmful and distressing for a woman. Women should have the right over their body to choose to sustain the fetus or not. In the past decades, women did not have their freedom of abortion in many countries of the world. There have always been controversies going on about abortion. Each individual has dissimilar views on the legality of abortion. Some people are against abortion for personal religious purposes and beliefs. For those who don’t believe in abortion, it is because they see it as killing a fetus, which is a human being. Others support abortion because they believe in women’s rights. Laws of abortion vary in each country, and abortion is not legal all over the world. It is illegal under any conditions but only permitted to save woman’s life if in countries such as Brazil, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates, and Ireland. However, abortion is legal without any restrictions in countries like Canada, Albania, and Italy. It the past decades Abortion was considered as criminal act in Canada. “If an abortion was carried out without such approval, the woman was liable for imprisonment for 2 years, an...
Private property gives individuals full responsibility for their actions concerning their private properties. To most nations around the world, private property is seen as a privilege to have because it is a freedom, such as privacy is a privilege or freedom. One has complete control over a personal belonging. Private property is having the right to do whatever one wants with what he or she owns. President Calvin Coolidge has been quoted as saying, “Ultimately, property rights and personal rights are the same thing.” meaning that having the right to one’s own property is a personal right and privilege one has gained in the quest for universal human rights. Private property owners have the right to do whatever they want with the land and rent out properties or resources. No legislation can tell an individual the actions he...
“We [the Islamic and Catholic faiths] share a special reverence for life. For Catholics this is often summarized under the expression ’the sanctity of human life’, which includes respect for the life and dignity of every human being...Muslims fully agree with this…” (Extract from the Joint statement on the Cairo conference on population and development by the American Muslim Council and the United States Catholic Bishops Conference.) The sanctity of human life is the belief that life is precious and must not, under any circumstances, be damaged or destroyed, but respected, protected and preserved. The Catholic Church and Islam have an almost identical concept of the sanctity of life where life is seen as a fundamental gift from their god. The protection and respect of human life has been a very controversial issue and is a matter of concern to the Catholic Church and Islam. Bioethics is one of these issues related to the sanctity of life where this belief is constantly being violated, causing much debate and a need for a spiritual solution. Bioethics is defined as “the study of the ethical, social, legal, philosophical and other related issues arising in health care, biological sciences and from biotechnology” (Healey, J. 2009). Subtopics under bioethics where the Islamic faith and the Catholic Church have some similarities are surrogate motherhood, organ donation and euthanasia. They also have differences in their positions on in-vitro fertilisation (IVF), contraception and abortion. Catholics make decisions about such issues using the teachings of Jesus, the Bible and the authority of the Pope. Muslims base all their decisions on the words of Allah which were revealed to the Prophet Muhammed in the Holy Qur’an, Islamic scholars ...
Eminent domain is the legal right to take away private property for public use by either state, or a private person or corporation. It is legally taken away for the purpose to exercise the functions of public characters. Eminent domain gives power to the federal, state and local governments, school district, hospital district, or any other agency to take away private property for the use of the public needs. Eminent domain also gives the power to the government to take away private property if needed to public needs, even without the owner’s full consent. In case of eminent domain, the owner of the property gets payments from the government through compensation. Most of the times, when the government takes away private property, it is for the needs of roads, public schools, or other useful utilities. Eminent domain in the Unites States is also mentioned in the Fifth Amendment of the constitution. The Fifth Amendment states, “ nor shall private property be taken for public use without just the compensation”. The proceeding to take the private property under the eminent domain policy is called condemnation proceeding. Eminent domain is not limited to freeway widening projects, however, it may include projects like working on a new city hall, shopping center, an office building, a bicycle path or a golf course. Nevertheless, Eminent domain not only applies to private property but also personal property. The government has the right to legally take away even a person’s personal property for the use of public needs. There are also two types of using the eminent domain. One way of using the eminent domain is taking just one part of the property from the owner and paying the owner. Second way of using emine...
Women’s reproductive rights are a global issue in today’s world. Women have to fight to have the right to regulate their own bodies and reproductive choices, although in some countries their voices are ignored. Abortion, sterilization, contraceptives, and family planning services all encompass this global issue of women’s reproductive rights.
This essay gives a brief outline of the major developments in the role of the Papacy between the Early Church and the present day. It will cover four aspects. The development of the papacy as a temporal ruler, Papal elections, the Curia and the development of the ‘mission role’ of the Papacy. It will explore how the papacy changed from being an organisation that had the influence to appoint kings and arrange state borders to one with a billion followers. These followers see the papacy as being responsible for the administration, pastoral and spiritual care of their membership.
The Catholic Church is against PGD, for several reasons. They believe, because of their religion, that all life is a gift from God. They consider life to begin at fertilisation, and therefore as PGD implies the discarding
LIkewise, the defence against PGD can also be read in a religious sense. A catholic church spokespseson, Dr Michael McCabe has said “every parent hopes to have healthy children, but not every means of achieving this is acceptable”. The Catholic church states that human beings exist within a moral order, established by God at creation. This moral order basically dictates that life events happen in God’s hands, which is why religious belief is actively against abortion and assisted reproductive technologies, as they alter the path God intends for us. While it is widely regarded that the church is trying to force a faith perspective on society, it is more accurate to view it as a defence of the ‘acceptable’ application of moral judgement in a
In the Encyclical on Birth Control by Pope Paul VI, Natural Law Theory is used to argue against the use of birth control. The Encyclical, according to the Pope, assumes that humans are free and responsible, possessing a free will that makes us responsible moral agents. One of the thoughtful duties that lies in humans is the transmission of human life, “for which married persons are the free and responsible collaborators of God the Creator” (174). Along with the duty that lies in humans there are two additional factors, the social concerns and the Apostolic Succession that make the Encyclical influential. Through the progression of time there have been various social factors that have played into birth control including population growth, the role of a woman in society, and the progress of humans and technology. Through Apostolic Succession the Pope is infallible which gives him a direct right, inherited through Peter. In the Encyclical the Pope will argue against birth control through the use of conjugal love, responsible parenthood, and Natural Law.