Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of communism in society
Communism and its effects
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lydia Chekovskaya wrote about Sofia Petrovna and the transformation she had undergone to closely reflect the state of mind and changes experienced by citizens of the Soviet Union during that time. As people began to suffer from the purges and other hardships due to Stalin’s incompetence, their minds and logic, much like Sofia Petrovna’s, became impaired leading them to try their best to rationalize Stalin’s actions. They believed in the party wholeheartedly, but when they finally realized the wrongdoing of the party, it was far too late. Before Sofia Petrovna truly experienced the moral and logical conflict in regards to the purges, she was a sympathizer of the party. She raised her son, Kolya, to lead a life that would make the party leaders proud. Sofia Petrovna stated in that her son was a “loyal Komsomol member,” and she felt “tenderness and fear” when she looked at him, but also pride (p. 19). …show more content…
Although she had enormous pride for her son and his achievements, she was “afraid to be glad” (p. 19). This was due to the fear that the party did not want her to be proud because it was an achievement of the party, rather than her own. The fundamentals of the party stated that the accomplishments of Soviet citizens were not due to themselves, but the work of Stalin and the party. Another conflict Sofia Petrovna had with the party initially was Natasha’s continual denial of admission to Komsomol. Sofia Petrovna had admired her, and understandably so because Natasha had been an extremely hard worker, politically aware, loyal to the party, and “never let a day go by without reading Pravda from beginning to end” (p. 24). Sofia Petrovna sympathized for Natasha and her situation, which led her to question the party’s logic with accepting members. She sought Kolya’s advice regarding the situation, but he simply regarded the “injustice” Sofia Petrovna felt as a “class concept” and that the “vigilance” used in selecting members was “essential” to the function of the party. After receiving Kolya’s remarks, she had realized he was right since Natasha had “come from a bourgeois, land-owning family,” which was not the ideal of the party (p. 24). An important ideology of the party was that people should be cautious of the bourgeois, therefore it was understandable, in citizens’ eyes, to deny them from Komsomol and other party organizations. Sofia Petrovna comforted Natasha in saying that she would be accepted in a few years, but Natasha did not reply and left with a “volume of Kolya’s Lenin” to take notes as he had advised (p. 25). Sofia Petrovna’s consoling was only due to her naïve belief that Natasha had a chance after the class struggle ended, and it was just courtesy so Natasha would not stop trying to be in the party or living as one should under the party. Another way in which Sofia Petrovna closely mirrored the majorities’ actions and beliefs was when “enemies had been discovered in their printshop” (p. 35). Anna Grigorievna spoke to everyone at the publishing house saying that “the vile enemy has thrust his paw into [their] establishment, too,” shocking everyone (p. 35). It was at this point in time when the party began to produce propaganda and prose that spread the idea that “enemies of the people were everywhere” (p.34-35). The party essentially falsely accused many of these “enemies” and had minimal justification, such as relation to an enemy. Families who had one person taken away during the purge were often identified as enemies, and most often killed as well. Following the discovery, arguments began as to who had let the enemy slip in to the printing shop and fingers were pointed at several people including the director and the secretary. This lead Sofia Petrovna to understand why Kolya had told her that vigilance was so important in letting people into Komsomol. Sofia Petrovna really began to have her every opinion molded into the opinions of the party that she thought was right. Sofia Petrovna discovers that Kolya had been arrested late at night in his dormitory for terrorist activity (p. 78). When Sofia Petrovna receives the news about his arrest from Alik, she breaks down. Her immediate thought is that “she must rush off somewhere” and “clear up this monstrous misunderstanding” (p. 45). However, as her quest for information continues, she assures herself that the government cannot possibly arrest an innocent man. She represents what the people of the Soviet Union were subject to during that time. They were subject to confusion because they believed the same thing as Sofia Petrovna, a mistake had been made, and that they might be able to fix it if they went to the government offices. All of the families that had experienced an arrest had spent their days and nights “in line” searching for an explanation of the ‘mistake’ that had resulted in the imprisonment of their loved ones (p. 55). Nevertheless, because of the faith in her party she was convinced the other women in line must have had a “saboteur” as a husband or son (p.50). Sofia Petrovna sympathized with the party and scolded Alik when he referred to Central Committee of Komsomol as “scoundrels” and “swine” because he had been blacklisted. Sofia Petrovna is unhappy with the way he spoke because he could be “expelled from Komsomol,” which is not helpful if he wants to remain loyal to the party (p. 72). She also denied his claim that his blacklisting was because he “wouldn’t renounce Nikolai” because she believed it was a “mistake” and “temporary” like the whole mess they had gotten into starting with Kolya’s arrest (p. 72-73). Society during this time was in constant fear of being ostracized by the party and its members, so they were very careful about what they would say or do. At this point Sofia Petrovna was convinced that they would release Kolya, and he and Alik would have their Komsomol memberships “reinstated right away” (p. 73). Following Kolya’s arrest, Sofia Petrovna’s neighbors became extraordinarily disapproving of her. They believed the Kolya was guilty and even blamed her for things that went wrong. The nurse said that she and other neighbors “had found her systematically stealing kerosene” and that Sofia Petrovna’s son was “an enemy of the people” (p. 98). At this point, she was beginning to portray the experience of those who were related to someone that was purge. The rest of society would disapprove anyone with a tie to a purge victim, and most often the relative or those close to a victim would be arrested themselves to protect the citizens of the Soviet Union. Eventually, Sofia Petrovna picked out small things that may have led to Kolya’s arrest to try to justify it. She went to the lines saying he made mistake because he was young and would never do it again, but since he really was an innocent victim like most others during this time, it did not work. Not only were the heads of the publishing house under fire, but each typist. After a simple typing mistake was made by Natasha, she feared that she would be fired “for lack of vigilance” because she wrote “Ret Army instead of Red army” (p.62). Sofia Petrovna wondered why Natasha believed they would do that after something simple, but ultimately Natasha was fired. Although not in conjunction with what most Soviet people would have done in this situation, Sofia Petrovna attempted to defend Natasha, but this action resulted in her own incrimination, and she also had to leave the publishing house. As a result of the event, Natasha was placed on the blacklist along Alik, and was unable to find work anywhere. When Natasha was blacklisted, she became increasingly depressed because she could not find work and could no longer keep her mind of of Kolya’s absence and the stresses of life during this time. Alik had been arrested as well because he would not renounce Kolya, and this made Natasha further aware of the crimes that the party had been committing. She reflected those during the time because she became so depressed and could not carry on living a normal life. The idea that the arrests were a plot of Stalin became increasingly prevalent because of how irrational it was. She began to be concerned about the government arresting Sofia Petrovna saying “don’t talk to me…they’ll see” in reference to the increased surveillance in society (p. 86). Natasha began writing to Stalin because of this conclusion, however realized that the only way she could go on is if she killed herself. For many, including Natasha, suicide was the only way to escape the nightmare that the government helped produced. Sadness and desperation were prominent during the time because people began to understand the faults of the government. One night while in line waiting to give Alik money, Kiparisiva, another family member of a purge victim, warned her about giving him money. Kipariziva tells Sofia Petrovna that regardless of the fact that they do not ask who gives money, they will link her to the “counterrevolutionary organization” that the boys are part of because “they know everything” (p. 93). She was disturbed by this and returned home to be torn apart by reality. However by this point reasoning was as impossible as coping with the loss of her son, so her only way of living was to completely dedicate herself to the party. She contemplates tearing up the letter that Natasha wrote her in regards to her suicide because she thinks that the party may “connect Kolya’s case to Natasha’s” (p 94). Since her brain is so disconnected from reality, her logic becomes wired to believe in the party. This is how many people became after all they had gone through, reality was fantastical, but they had no ability to make sense of what was happening because it was so unjustifiable. After waiting two years Sofia Petrovna was at a new job, and did not speak to anyone there.
She found out from Kiparisiva that the government was letting innocent people out. This further convinced her to continue to reside her faith in the party because they must have realized their mistake. Many Soviet citizens became excited that there was a chance that their loved ones would be released and resided some faith in that unlikely idea. Although some were released, it was a very small number wand the event was just to gain back support for the government. Sofia Petrovna finally received a frightening letter in which Kolya beilieved he “[wouldn’t] last [there] long” and that she “must do something quick” to save him (p. 107). Following the letter she finds out that Kiparisiva is being deported and decided to burn the letter from Kolya. She burnt the letter as a last resort to remain true to the idea that the party will release him because she cannot do anything. It was her only option since she was alone and the party was her only chance at living a normal life
again. As life became more difficult and more people experienced the purges, they began to suffer the twisted fantasy that was their reality. Like Sofia Petrovna, the majority of the Soviet people remained faithful to the party as they had received false hope that the party may change their lives around. Sofia began to be more closely attached to the small amount of faith that the party had reproduced constantly that by the time she had realized the true faults of the party, she had no choice but to deny reality. She and many others denied reality because they knew that Stalin and the party had scared them and left them with no other option.
Dolores Stewart Riccio is an American author that writes cookbooks, poems, and novels in the mystery and thriller genres. Born in Boston and brought in New England most of the settings of her Circle of Five series of noels are set in Pembroke, Massachusetts where she grew up. She was married to Ottone Riccio an author, teacher, and poet best known for the Intimate Art of Writing Poetry. From that first marriage she had two children son, Charles Sundance Anderson and daughter Lucy-Marie Sanel both of whom deem themselves among the Penobscots of Maine. Dolores is Scotch-Irish though she held a traditional Penobscot funeral on Indian Island on Old Town, Maine for her son when she died in 2007. For her cookbooks, she has always preferred to use her married name Dolores Riccio as she credits her Native American husband who was insistent that she try many experimental dishes. Conversely, she uses her maiden name of Dolores Stewart when she is writing her poetry. Not one to abandon either of her heritage or past life she decided to use both of her names when she pivoted to the writing of fiction novels. She has recently moved back to Pinehills in Plymouth the small town that she had always adored growing up as a child in nearby Pembroke. She lives at the Avalon Apartments a pleasant and peaceful apartment complex in town, where
In Samba, Alma Guillermoprieto describes the Carnival celebrated every year in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and explores the black cultural roots from which it takes its traditions as well as its social, economic, and political context in the 1980s. From her firsthand experience and investigation into favela life and the role of samba schools, specifically of Manguiera, Guillermoprieto illustrates a complex image of race relations in Brazil. The hegemonic character of samba culture in Brazil stands as a prevalent theme in numerous facets of favela life, samba schools, and racial interactions like the increasing involvement of white Brazilians in Carnival preparation and the popularity of mulatas with white Brazilians and tourists. Rio de Janeiro’s early development as a city was largely segregated after the practice of slavery ended. The centralization of Afro-Brazilians in favelas in the hills of the city strengthened their ties to black
People who spoke against the structure of the government were imprisoned or executed. There was also the imprisonment of innocent people, that were accused to be committing treason against the Government. One of the innocent, executed victims was Heda Margolius Kovály’s former husband and Deputy Minister of Foreign Trade, Rudolph Margolius. Rudolph Margolius’ imprisonment directly affected Heda and her child, Ivan because they were living in rough conditions because the government intervened with her jobs and would try to make her move out of her home. Years after the trials, in 1963, the government released a document stating “that all the people who had been convicted at the trials were innocent” and that “their confessions had been extorted illegally” for the own benefit of the Communist Party (Margolius-Kovály 167).
In the book Sofia Petrovna, the author Lydia Chukovskaya writes about Sofia Petrovna and her dreadful experiences as a widowed mother during the Russian Stalinist Terror of the 1930s. There were four basic results of the Russian Stalinist Terror: first, it was a way of keeping people in order; second, it kept Stalin in power and stopped revolutions from forming, made people work harder to increase the output of the economy, and separated families as well as caused deaths of many innocent people due to false charges.
This was, of course, only a humorous exaggeration, a case of political satire. Yet beneath the humor, there lies a very profound testament to the belief that Russia's political culture has been inherited from its czarist days and manifested throughout its subsequent development. The traditions from the pre-Revolution and pre-1921 Russia, it seems, had left its brand on the 70-years of Communist rule. The Soviet communism system was at once a foreign import from Germany and a Russian creation: "on the one hand it is international and a world phenomenon; on the other hand it is national and Russian…it was Russian history which determined its limits and shaped its character." (Berdyaev, "Origin")
The short story, “Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka and His Aunt”, explicates the life of a man named Ivan Fyodorovich Shponka. We see him briefly in his young years, followed by his life in the army, and his return to the farm where his strong characterized aunt resides. We can see immediately that this man lives in constant cleanliness and dutiful paranoia; these are some of his desires that he wishes to exhibit to others. We can also see his fears, which reside in the confiscation of his masculinity and independence. This short story has many elements that resemble others in the Nikolai Gogol collection.
Tino Villanueva was born on December 11, 1941 in south-central Texas in a town known as San Marcos, where both of Villanueva’s parents worked as migrant field workers which embarrassed him (Tino Villanueva Biography). Although his parents were identified as Mexican, many people deemed Tino Villanueva has “Chicano”.
The Communist Party was one of the main sections in Soviet society that was impacted profoundly by Stalin’s terror. In 1935, the assassination of Sergei Kirov, a faithful Communist and Bolshevik party member that had certain popularity, threatening Stalin’s consolidation of power, initiated The Great Purge. His death, triggering three important, widely publicised ‘show trials’ in Moscow, ultimately encouraged the climate of terror during the Great Purge. Bolsheviks Zinoviev, Kamenev and their associates were accused of conspiring against Stalin and the government, with each confessing to their supposed crimes, which were then broadcast around the world. It was later discovered that these confessions were forced after long months of psychological abuse and cruel acts of torture. As Stalin...
In 1934, Sergey Kirov a rival to Stalin was murdered. Stalin is believed to have been behind the assassination, he used it as a pretext to arrest thousands of his other opponents who in his words might have been responsible for Kirov’s murder. These purges not only affected those who openly opposed Stalin but ordinary people too. During the rule of Stain o...
On July 16, 1918, the Russian imperial family, the Romanovs, were executed in the basement of the Ipatiev House by the Bolshevik political party. While The Kitchen Boy, by Robert Alexander, follows the point of view of the family’s young kitchen boy during this event, along with a different possible ending to history, it also follows the boy through the poor treatment of the royal family long before they were killed. During their stay in the House of Special Purpose under control of the Bolsheviks, the Romanov family endured physical, psychological, and spiritual mistreatments.
Being one of the greatest Russian writers of 20th century, Aleksander Solzhenitsyn had a unique talent that he used to truthfully depict the realities of life of ordinary people living in Soviet era. Unlike many other writers, instead of writing about “bright future of communism”, he chose to write about everyday hardships that common people had to endure in Soviet realm. In “Matryona’s Home”, the story focuses on life of an old peasant woman living in an impoverished collectivized village after World War 2 . In the light of Soviet’s propaganda of creating a new Soviet Nation, the reader can observe that Matryona’s personality and way of life drastically contradicted the desired archetype of New Soviet Man. Like most of the people in her village,
Solzhenitsyn believed that it was nearly impossible to have truly free thoughts under the prison camp conditions described in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, or in any situation where there is an authoritarian ruler. In a pris...
When most people hear the name Joseph Stalin, they usually associate the name with a man who was part of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He was willingly to do anything to improve the power of the Soviet Union’s economy and military, even if it meant executing tens of millions of innocent people (Frankforter, A. Daniel., and W. M. Spellman 655). In chapter three of Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book, Everyday Stalinism, she argues that since citizens believed the propaganda of “a radiant future” (67), they were able to be manipulated by the Party in the transformation of the Soviet Union. This allowed the Soviet government to expand its power, which ultimately was very disastrous for the people.
67 year-old performance artist Marina Abramović once said, “I don’t have this kind of feeling in real life, but in performance I have this enormous love, this heart that literally hurts me with how much I love them."
Elena Gorokhova explains in her memoir that “The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they're lying, they know we know they're lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.” The novel, A Mountain of Crumbs, depicts the hopelessness, opression and deception of life behind the Iron Curtain during the 70s and 80s. Many rights of the people within the Soviet Union were violated and unacknowledged. In ages past, there were no human rights but the idea evolved after a while. It was at the end of World War II that the United Nations created the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, with the purpose of saving future generations from devastating internal conflicts. Human rights are the rights one has simply because one is a human being. There is no distinction between who can exercise and obtain their rights. Some of these obvious rights include that all humans are born free with the promise of life, liberty and security of person. The above rights should be protected and respected by everyone. However, the rights of the communist nations in the USSR were not kept safe. Specifically, the rights to emigrate and move freely as pleased, the freedom of consciousness, thought and religion and the ability to express oneself as they wish. Essentially, people’s rights were being restricted within the Iron Curtain, many of them uncovering their voices and pleeing for change at once, but instead they encountered armed forces prepared to erase anyone in defense of the status quo.