Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Philosophy exposition of love
The Concept Of Love
An essay to explain what love really is
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Euthyphro Argument
In the Euthyphro, Plato has Socrates, his student, explain the argument that “Holiness” cannot be defined as “whatever (all) the gods love”. Euthyphro is a priest in the story where he is supposed to know a great deal about his preaching. Then through some conversation, Euthyphro expresses that it is holy it is loved by the multiple gods. He claims that “Holy” is loved by the gods because it is “Holy,” and it’s the case that being holy is because the gods love it.
Essentially the third definition of holiness according to Socrates was that the Gods love things because they are holy, and that things are not holy because the Gods love them. That means that things or actions are already holy and then Gods love them,
In the book “Phaedo,” Plato discusses the theory of forms with ideas that concern the morality of the form. There are four philosophers that are expressed which are Phaedo, Cebes, and Simmias regarding the execution of Socrates. Socrates is presented in “Phaedo” on the morning of his execution where he is being killed. He tells his disciples Simmias and Cebes that he is not afraid of dying because a true philosopher should welcome and look forward to death but not suicide. A man should never commit suicide. He says that we are possessions of the Gods and should not harm themselves. He provides the four arguments for his claim that the soul is immortal and that a philosopher spends his whole life preparing for death.
In “The Apology” and “Euthyphro”, Plato creates a picture of the principles Socrates has on philosophy and wisdom. Since there are know direct pieces of literature written by Socrates, all of the information about him are composed by other Philosophers who encountered him. So when I refer to Socrates, it means the character depicted by Plato. I will argue that some important characteristics of philosophy and being a philosopher is evident by comparing Socrates with Euthyphro because of how he sees knowledge is obtained combined with the impact with which religion has on society.
What it did succeed in was claiming that piety affects things to have “the quality of being loved by all the gods” (Euth. 11a). While this does help paint a picture of piety, describing one aspect or consequence that piety has on things, it does not accomplish the task of actually showing us how or why the thing became pious in the first place. This affect comes after the formation of piety, and for the One Form Requirement to be fulfilled it is required to find something that comes prior to
Socrates argues in the Crito that he shouldn't escape his death sentence because it isn't just. Crito is distressed by Socrates reasoning and wishes to convince him to escape since Crito and friends can provide the ransom the warden demands. If not for himself, Socrates should escape for the sake of his friends, sons, and those who benefit from his teaching. Socrates and Crito's argument proceeds from this point.
In his thought-provoking book, “The Pursuit of Holiness,” Jerry Bridges offers a personal look on what it means to be holy like Christ. The book is scripture backed and covers all areas of holiness as a Christian. In the book, Bridges starts off with assessing just what holiness is. To be holy is to be morally blameless and to have no sin (p. 15). Holiness is being separated from the ways of the world and becoming more like Christ. To be holy does not mean that you obey a set of rules, but is instead string to do always do what is pleasing in the eyes of the Lord. In Romans chapter 12 verses 1 and 2, Paul challenges the people to give up their bodies as a holy sacrifice for kingdom work. He continues on saying that this is truly
Euthyphro’s second definition of piety is “the pious is what the gods love”. Socrates takes this idea and
There are times in every mans life where our actions and beliefs collide—these collisions are known as contradictions. There are endless instances in which we are so determined to make a point that we resort to using absurd overstatements, demeaning language, and false accusations in our arguments. This tendency to contradict ourselves often questions our character and morals. Similarly, in The Trial of Socrates (Plato’s Apology), Meletus’ fallacies in reason and his eventual mistake of contradicting himself will clear the accusations placed on Socrates. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates is not guilty of corrupting the youth with the idea of not believing in the Gods but of teaching the youth to think for themselves by looking to new divinities.
In the defense speech given by Socrates at the beginning of his trial, he hints at a definition of holiness. “..I live in great poverty because of my service to the god” (23C). Piety, according to Socrates, is defined by one who sacrifices his own necessities and luxuries in order to better service the gods; it is the willingness of one to please the god by way of a disservice to himself; a general forfeit of life-excesses as well as life requirements.
(MacArthur 66) These believers understood that they were children of God (1:14a) and as such Peter is urging them to not be conformed to their previous desires (1:14 b) but to instead demonstrate holiness in every aspect of their lives (1:15) because God is holy (1:16). To be holy means “that Christians must conform their thinking and behavior to God’s character.” (Baker 111) The standard of holiness was not just called for by Peter, but Christ first set this standard in His sermon on the mount (Matt. 5:4). The most compelling reason for God’s people to live in holiness is because of their relationship with
Dating all the way back to ancient Greece, Plato raised a challenge by merely asking, “Is it right because God commands it, or does God command it because it’s right?” Nowadays, this simple yet complex question poses a problem to modern day Christians. When understanding this question, you are forced to believe you only have one of two choices to accept. Those being either it is right because God commands it or God commands it because it is right. If it is right because God commands it then anything, specifically evil, could be right. On the other hand, if God commands it because it is right then the standard of goodness is no longer. Both options are hostile to Christianity. However, after further investigation, there is a third option: God’s very nature is the standard of goodness. By closely examining Plato’s Euthyphro Dilemma, it’s clear that a theist should undoubtedly accept the third option, being that of God’s nature is the standard of goodness.
The New Testament declares the Holiness of God, it also points to Jesus being that holy God. Jesus is absolutely perfect in all His ways, He is sinless (no sin can be found). The Lord is above all, no one is higher or greater than Him. His Love, mercy, anger and wrath is all Holy, it shows all the attributes of a holy and just God. Mark 1:24 states "Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art, the Holy One of God". There is plenty proof found in the New Testament and in the Old Testament that shows that God (Jesus Christ) is the only standard of
Euthyphro was arguing that by doing what the gods believe is holy and pious you are making them better, in other words you are taking care of them and it is like a kind of service that you are doing towards the gods. Euthyphro said, “The kind of care, Socrates, that slaves take of their masters” which meant that you are taking care of them in the sense that you are making them better and not actually caring for them (17, 13d). In other words, you are helping improve them and this is a service that the gods appreciate and want you to do. He believed that this service is improving the gods and that they like this service. The gods believe that being holy is a service towards them, therefore there should be a reason on why the gods use us and want to reward our holiness. He believes that the gods choose what is holy for a reason and should be approved by
...tion with God. In other words, without God, it is impossible to be Holy. Moreover, the Bible tells us in I Peter 1:16 “Because it is written, be ye holy for I am holy” (Kings James Version). Therefore, in order to become Holy; we must abide in Christ and become a new creature as stated in (2 Corinthians 5:17). Because of this correlation, our mind (conscience), body and heart is transformed. We have become as babes in Christ Jesus our Lord. Consequently, giving us a clean heart whereby we can now be Holy (Psalms 51:10.
The gods had to create their own support system of ranking, and morals to embrace something as holy because it may be holy all along. The end results that is drawn entails a different way, because in higher regards may be something than the reasons of gods. There is two points that is interesting questions that Euthyphro raises. There are many sacred texts that lay out reasons of morality in detail to stop difficult situation from happening within one’s soul, in the case of Catholicism.
What is the holiness of God? People might assume that the meaning of “the holiness of God” is God being separated from sin, but that is the result of His holiness. I believe the correct definition of “the holiness of God” is the totality of His being. In other words, it is not that God is holy, because He is separated from sin; rather, it is correct to say that since