Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Trial of Socrates arguing his innocence
What are the charges brought against socrates
Socrates's influence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Trial of Socrates arguing his innocence
From what I can tell Socrates was accused by Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon. Socrates believed that these three accused him of corrupting the youth due to the fact that he found them to be less wise than he. Socrates approached these three individuals in their respective fields as they were said to be the wisest, but Socrates questioned their wisdom. Due to their knowledge in their respective fields they carried ignorance into other pursuit when they truly knew nothing. The accusations of the crime came from the following: Meletus on behalf of the poets, Anytus on behalf of the craftsman & politicians, and Lycon on behalf of the orators. Socrates deposes Meletus and questions his accusations on what seems to be logic. One statement being, how
Thrasymuchus was very hostile against Socrates in Book I. Every attempt that was made to prove Thrasymuchus wrong was badgered by bad comments of Socrates trying to manipulate him and the others. Socrates from the beginning on 336b was asking questions all the way to 347e building up his defense to Thrasymuchus statement that "justice is the interest of the stronger party" (Pg. 338 Para. C). Socrates disagrees with Thrasymuchus and he states, "Surely, then, no doctor, insofar as he is a doctor, seeks or orders what is advantageous to himself, but what is advantageous to his patient?" (Pg. 342 Para. D). Thrasymuchus and Socrates agreed to all these professions and what was considered a leader and what wasn't considered a leader. Socrates goes on with this, "… that a ship's captain or ruler won't seek and order to what is advantageous to himself, but what is advantageous to a sailor …" (Pg. 342 Para. E). Specifically there in those two statements Socrates has already shot down the idea of Thrasymuchus, but here is an example that Thrasymuchus gives to defend himself earlier in the reading:
In Plato’s Symposium, he describes the party which Agathon had several famous people of his time over for dinner. Those in attendance include Phaedrus, Pausanias, Eryximachus, Aristophanes, and Socrates. The party begins by the members of the party eating dinner and then beginning to talk to about love. Each person gives a eulogy of love. After everyone has spoken, including Socrates, Alcibiades enters and gives a eulogy of Socrates. The two agree on the nature of love in some ways, and disagree in others. They both have very different viewpoints on the subject. Socrates takes a very philosophical and approach and Alcibiades takes a more simplistic approach.
Recognized as one of the classical Greek Athenian philosophers who founded Western philosophy, Socrates was a mysterious figure known essentially through the accounts of later classical writers, especially from writings of his students Xenophon and the most popular Plato. Through Plato’s dialogues, Socrates has been portrayed and renowned for his involvement in the field of moral principles, and by this the concepts of Socratic irony and the Socratic Method had come about. With Socrates’ pedagogy, a series of questions can be asked not only to draw individual answers, but also to persuade deep-seated insights into the real issues at hand. His result remains a frequently used tool in a broad series of discussions.
In Plato's, The Apology of Socrates, Socrates was accused and on trial for two charges: that he had corrupted the youth of Athens with his teachings, and, that he advocated the worship of false gods. Socrates taught his students to question everything in a thirst for knowledge. Thus, many politicians were looked at as hypocrites. Because of this, many politicians feared Socrates and wanted Socrates away from Athens. Socrates tried to defend himself against the charges by addressing each accusation. He classified the accusations into two categories, recent and ancient. The recent being the actual accusations and the ancient being the rumors that had circled Athens for years about how Socrates was a man of evil and a man who makes the worse case look to be the better.
Socrates is accused of impiety and for corrupting the lives of youths through his interactions with them and his teachings. Socrates defends his position on all charges believing he is doing just cause and in doing so is steadfastly abiding by his moral standards. Socrates believes that what matters is life and living it well. Socrates believes he should be rewarded rather than punished for his beliefs. He thinks he should be given free meals in the Prytaneum, where the Olympic athletes are celebrating or to pay a small sum of money which his friends raise to three times what Socrates proposes. In the end, Socrates accepts the judgment bestowed on him by the courts, the sentence of death. He accepts this verdict because he believes it is morally just to abide by the decision handed down by the state.
Around the fourth century BCE, philosophy in Ancient Greece arose rapidly. This early form was speculative, so it was based entirely off the reasoning process without any factuality involved. While the Hellenistic Era approached, philosophy was taken to a whole new level. During Greece’s Golden Age, Socrates emerged expanding on these basic beliefs by using his inquisitive mind. Although Socrates’ ideology set the basis for western thought, his dedication to his beliefs brought him about as a polarizing figure in Athens.
‘I, men of Athens, reply that it’s Meletus who is guilty of playing around with serious matters, of lightly bringing people to trial, and of professing to be seriously concerned about things he has never cared about at all.’ (24c) First, Socrates is saying that Meletus has no concern for the youth. Second, you cannot charge another person for corrupting the youth if you show no concern for them. Therefore, since Meletus has no concern for the youth, he cannot charge Socrates for corrupting the youth. In conclusion, Meletus contradicts himself, which makes Socrates innocent. “Well then, Meletus, it has been adequately established that you’ve never given any thought to young people – you’ve plainly revealed your indifference – and that you care nothing about the issues on which you bring me to trial’ (25c)
Finally Socrates says that no matter which way Meletos tries to accuse him the claims are without merit. If Socrates is corrupting youth is not intentional, therefore, he cannot be charged with committing an overt crime. "Either I have not a bad influence, or it is unintentional; so in either case what you (Meletos) claim is false." Since anything Socrates may have done to the youth was purely without intention and therefore totally innocent.
Socrates is an Athenian stone cutter in his late seventies with three children that is convicted of series crimes. The rationale that he considers to be wisdom is seen by the rest of society as rebellion and disrespect which is why he was managed to be the person of blame at the loss of a war. Socrates responds to the allocated charges in the court of law of Athens quite uniquely but the real reason for the charges placed was his use of wisdom.
2). Because Socrates publicly questioned the norm and backed up his comments, youth started to challenge the system, that being said Socrates argued that he “either I do not corrupt them, or I corrupt them unintentionally, so that on either view of the case,” his accusers were in fact making themselves into liars and had no real claim against him (Plato p. 7). It had been common knowledge for quite some time the aspect of free will and therefore Socrates could ever predict what people took away from his lectures as he could not determine when they first came in or how much they actually were paying attention. To polish off his accusers, he says “my offence is unintentional, the law has no cognizance of unintentional offences,” which meant that since there was no slandering of specific people, or groups that there was no lawful case against him (Plato p.
In the spring of 399 BCE, A man named Socrates was put on trial in front of his native Athenians. Facing the charges of not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, and introducing other new divinities. In addition, He is also charged with corrupting the youth of Athens. The affidavit introduced by Meletus demands the penalty of death. These are very serious charges and the demand of death should not be taken lightly. Yet Meletus is ignorant about what he claims and his accusations can easily be rebutted.
To begin his defense Socrates explains to the jury that the men speaking against him, while they are quite persuasive, have not been honest and are simply spreading rumors and lies. While Socrates is being accused of corrupting the youth, he tells the jury of how these men began circulating these rumors by misleading the children. The children were repeatedly told that Socrates was not to be trusted, so as to cement this belief early while the children were not be old enough to question what is being told of them. The aristocrats knew that children would take everything authority said to them as fact.
life, and that is why he ultimately believed that "the unexamined life is not worth living."
Socrates mentioned that Meletus, Anytus and Lycon who have brought the present charges to the court are the latest accusers who have accused him of anything. He has older accusers, which he has more reasons to fear than these recent accusers because the older ones have been speaking out against him from the time of their youth and their accusations has gotten to a more extent level than the second. The first accusers accused Socrates of two acts, which they were: believing in spiritual things and corrupting the young ones by teaching them how to make weaker arguments overcome stronger arguments.
Socrates, a Greek philosopher and teacher, was born June 4th, 469 BC in Athens, lived his life in Athens, and died in May 7, 399 BC. Because Socrates never wrote anything of his own, there is little evidence of Socrates life. Everything the world knows about Socrates comes mainly from the works of Plato, Aristotle, Aristophanes, and Xenophon. These works are mostly dialogues, plays, and historians’ notes. It is in the works and dialogues of two main witnesses that the life of Socrates has mostly been constructed. These two witnesses are Plato and Xenophon, both of which were students of Socrates. From these writings, we learn that Socrates’ father, Sophroniscus, was a stone cutter, or sculptor, and his mother, Phaenarete, was a midwife. He married Xanthippe, who was considered a shrew, and they had three sons, Lamprocles, Sophroniscus and Menexenus. All three sons were still very young at the time of Socrates’ death. Because she was so ill-tempered, Xanthippe was very difficult to live with and that Socrates had attested that having learned to live with Xanthippe, he would be able to cope with every other human being.