Society Through The Lens Of An Exchange And Rational Choice Theory

346 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Sociology and human behavior

Homans explains society through the lens of an exchange and rational choice theorist. Methodological individualism is when sociologist starts with the relationships between humans on a micro level. This method views civilization through micro conflicts and believes “individuals shape society through their intentional actions” (Notes Exchange Theory/Rational Choice Theory). Homans regards social behaviors as an exchange, which is somewhat rewarding or costly. Furthermore, he believes that people will repeat the same actions as long as the costs outweigh the benefits. If a past activity was rewarded, then the person is more likely to repeat it. Equilibrium occurs to an individual when a balance of reward and cost is met. Occasionally, rewards

Show More
Related

  • Social Exchange Theory: A Brief Reality TV Show The Bachelor

    174 Words  | 1 Pages

    This particular clip from Friends made me think of another notable reality television show, The Bachelor, which also demonstrates the social exchange theory. This theory has the role in explaining why people stay in relationships. This social exchange theory yearns for some sort of reward that can encompass in companionship or even as a financial investment. The idea of companionship can be related to the television show, The Bachelor, which exhibits the male constantly weighting the cost and benefit of each woman. Each person in the show is competing for a chance at love, ultimately trying to win someones heart. The reward in it all, is the hope in finding their potential wife or husband. The example from the video clip down below, shows the

    Read More

  • Individualism And Collectivism And In Love's Labor By Eva Kittay

    1698 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kittay’s work detailing the dependency relationship explains that human rely on each other; Aristotle’s work conveys that human forms household for economical interest; and Marx’s work implied that humans are eventually one classless society with best economical benefits for all. Whether or not being members in community is the best way to live for every human is still debatable, but it is the only choice that humans all made by

    Read More

  • Human Nature as Viewed by Thomas Hobbes and David Hume

    1952 Words  | 4 Pages

    We will give Hobbes’ view of human nature as he describes it in Chapter 13 of Leviathan. We will then give an argument for placing a clarifying layer above the Hobbesian view in order to account for acts of altruism.

    Read More

  • Sociological Theories of Deviance

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... value system. For example, we can compare a middle class man who has a career and is living in the suburbs with his family, and a homeless man living in the ghetto with no ties or bonds with anyone. The man that “has nothing to lose” is more likely to commit deviant acts, due to his lacking in a career, possessions, and close bonds in a community. The homeless man would feel more free to deviate, versus the middle class man that has a status to uphold to, and a family to tend to.

    Read More

  • Hobbes and Locke

    869 Words  | 2 Pages

    In many ways Hobbes and Locke’s conclusions on man and society create a polarizing argument when held in comparison to each other. For instance the two make wildly conflicting assertions concerning mankind’s capacity to foster and achieve organized society. Hobbes asserts humans cannot be trusted to govern themselves lest they fall into war and chaos; Locke, on the other hand concludes almost the exact opposite. Despite the polarity in each man’s train of thought, both philosophies share a common ancestor: a state defined by total equality where no human is superior or holds dominance over another. Although this is the base of both theories, it is the only similarity between the two. This commonality can be illustrated when tracing each argument deductively from their conclusions, the comparison reveals that the heaviest and most base opposition in each mans philosophy is his assertions regarding the nature of human beings.

    Read More

  • View of Society in Lord of the Flies

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    question of the nature of society. As to this question, Golding asserts that society is an

    Read More

  • The Basis of the United States Government

    1057 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes derived his theories by concluding that man in and of itself was evil. In addition, he felt that if left without a government authority, life would be "nasty, brutish, and short". In a direct result of the evilness of man comes the theory that self-preservation is the most imperative component of life. At all costs, one must uphold this right and do whatever is necessary to preserve it. Because every man in a state of nature can be based on one theory, it creates a state of equal mentality. If one man basis life around self-preservation, so will the next. With a society being in this perpetual condition, it creates a state of war. One man against all others—all equal in ability regardless of size or intelligence due to circumstances and willpower that can always level the playing field.

    Read More

  • Case Study Of The Kibbutz

    828 Words  | 2 Pages

    This was achieved by causing individual’s to live in close proximity, and depend on one another to construct a functioning society. In these societies many of them have dining halls or something of this sort that individuals’ can go to receive their meals which causes them to interact with other people in the society. Along with living in close proximity or interacting in the dining hall there is still the idea of communal dependency which is cause by the idea that “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”. This idea gives individuals’ to produce positive influence in their society anyway possible which can highly benefit everyone in the community, therefore, causing them to get the desire to build the

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Social Exchange Theory and the Symbolic Interaction Theory

    1971 Words  | 4 Pages

    The theory I originally chose to critique was the Social Exchange and Rational Choice framework from our class book. I chose this theory because when we talked about it in class it made a lot of sense to me. Its propositions and foundations are very applicable to many situations, and I felt like I had a good grasp of its concepts and structure. However, in doing research for this paper, I discovered that contrary to what our book led me to believe, Social Exchange is a theory entirely separate from Rational Choice theory. So, in keeping with this discovery and despite my better judgment, I will do my best to relay and critique the information I find on either one or both theories and then compare only Social Exchange theory to the Symbolic Interaction framework. Although I will try to get the same information for both theories, there are not many resources which describe Social Exchange theory, and there are far more for Rational Choice theory, so the critique and discussion may be a little lopsided.

    Read More

  • drive

    3010 Words  | 7 Pages

    Over the course of human civilization, we have transcended through at least two full stages of what drives our motivation. Originally, in motivation 1.0 (P. 30), our behavior was simple, what motivated us was the pursuit of food, shelter, and the desire to reproduce. This platform of motivation or human operating system was simple and worked effectively until the population of humanity grew so large that it became imperative for humans to interact with one another and work together i...

    Read More

  • Understanding Human Nature, By Thomas Hobbes And Peter Kropotkin

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    The concept of human nature has been theorized and debated repeatedly by philosophers throughout history; contrasting arguments regarding whether or not human beings are intrinsically competitive, or compassionate have been put forth by Thomas Hobbes and Peter Kropotkin. Understanding human nature is important in order to properly understand why human beings behave in the manner that they do, and whether or not all people instinctively are made to think similarly. Being equipped with this knowledge can allow for one to better understand events in history and different aspects of life, such as politics.

    Read More

  • A Reflection Of The Interaction Between Self And Society

    1620 Words  | 4 Pages

    Understanding the relationship between self and society should base on both individual perspective and social perspective. Wright Mill gave

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Hofstede's Theory

    1717 Words  | 4 Pages

    With the help of the literature, discuss one of the cultural constructs in Hofstede’s model. Following this, discuss any elaboration, application, modification and criticism the construct has attracted in the form of further research.

    Read More

  • The Three Major Theoretical Perspectives in Sociology

    1966 Words  | 4 Pages

    Talcott Parson (Parsons 1951) sees society as a collection of systems within systems Parson determined that each individual has expectations of the other's action and reaction to his own behaviour, and that these expectations would be derived from the accepted norms and values of th...

    Read More

  • Essay On Butterfly Effect On Community

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

    Does an individual affect the community that they are part of? There is a phenomenon known as the butterfly effect , where the smallest actions can have momentous effects. This theory is applicable to sciences such as physics, but also sociology such interactions of a community and a person’s role within it. Although an individual uses their community for early development, it is that individual’s responsibility to maintain that community once they have matured.

    Read More

More about Society Through The Lens Of An Exchange And Rational Choice Theory

Open Document