Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of social exchange theory
Social exchange theory paper
Introduction of social exchange theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This particular clip from Friends made me think of another notable reality television show, The Bachelor, which also demonstrates the social exchange theory. This theory has the role in explaining why people stay in relationships. This social exchange theory yearns for some sort of reward that can encompass in companionship or even as a financial investment. The idea of companionship can be related to the television show, The Bachelor, which exhibits the male constantly weighting the cost and benefit of each woman. Each person in the show is competing for a chance at love, ultimately trying to win someones heart. The reward in it all, is the hope in finding their potential wife or husband. The example from the video clip down below, shows the
much the risk of loneliness as the challenge of exposure to more interesting men- and
Human beings are not isolated individuals. We do not wander through a landscape of trees and dunes alone, reveling in our own thoughts. Rather, we need relationships with other human beings to give us a sense of support and guidance. We are social beings, who need talk and company almost as much as we need food and sleep. We need others so much, that we have developed a custom that will insure company: marriage. Marriage assures each of us of company and association, even if it is not always positive and helpful. Unfortunately, the great majority of marriages are not paragons of support. Instead, they hold danger and barbs for both members. Only the best marriages improve both partners. So when we look at all three of Janie’s marriages, only her marriage to Teacake shows the support, guidance, and love.
Throughout the prominent television series, also known as Friends, the writers carefully included and manipulated many sociological concepts. The writers of the series incorporated such concepts that many watchers hardly noticed that they were in the episodes. A few concepts weaved into the television series included an ingroup, culture, the social learning theory, and leadership styles. The Friends characters often learned from each other throughout the series through some sociological concepts.
Do you know the guiltiest pleasure of the American public? Two simple words reveal all—reality TV. This new segment of the TV industry began with pioneering shows like MTV’s The Real World and CBS’s Survivor. Switch on primetime television nowadays, and you will become bombarded by and addicted to numerous shows all based on “real” life. There are the heartwarming tales of childbirth on TLC, melodramas of second-rate celebrities on Celebrity Mole, and a look into a completely dysfunctional family on The Osbornes. Yet, out of all these entertaining reality shows arises the newest low for popular culture, a program based on the idea of a rich man or woman in search of the perfect marriage partner. The Bachelor, and its spin-off The Bachelorette, exemplify capitalist ideology founded on the Marxist base-superstructure model and establish the role of an active American audience.
Another theme seen all over today is the fighting between two men or woman for the love of a woman or man. So many television episodes have been designated for this theme because of its popularity with the media. Jerry Springer is just one example. So many people enjoy this show because of the violence that is shown when two people are fighting, especially two girls for one man. I think it's rather stupid though because there are plenty other men or women in this world that one could desire.
In the T.V. Show “The Big Bang Theory,” woman are shown to have more realistic and complex roles than in the T.V. Show “Married with Children.” We will be looking at the different female roles in both “The Big Bang Theory” that started on television in 2007, and “Married with Children,” that first aired in 1987. We will see in to the realistic side of the characters by looking at their attitudes and attire, and how their roles are complex by looking at their ambitions and jobs in the work place.
I have learned that, interpersonal relationships are difficult to maintain. I often ask myself why, relationships require so much work. Why do I, stay in a relationship where the bad outweighs the good? The social exchange perspective argues, according to Monge & Contractor, as cited by West & Turner that “People calculate the overall worth of a particular relationship by subtracting its cost from the rewards it provides.”
Travis Hirschi presented a social bonding theory in 1969. The main idea of the social bonding theory is that each and every individual has a drive to act in selfish and even aggressive ways that might possibly lead to criminal behavior. Social bonding theory is somewhat have similarities with the Durkheim theory that “we are all animals, and thus naturally capable of committing criminal acts” (Tibbetts, 2012, p. 162). However, the stronger a person is bonded to the conventional society, for example, family, schools, communities, the less prone a person is to be involved in criminal activity. The great example of this would be the serial killer Nannie Doss. Since early age she did not have any bonds either to her family with an abusive father or to community she lived in. Most of the time during her childhood she was isolated from any social interactions with her schoolmates or friends.
This is a key for humans. While this simplistic assumption of what people want from other is a critique of this theory, I believe it spells out the idea of friendship very well. We live in a world where people want to get someone for themselves out of whatever they are doing. This is a sad fact of the way society has grown. We have turned very selfish but I do not look at is as always a negative thing. By taking the rewards and subtracting the cost of a relationship there could be times that a person can get out of a toxic relationship before it becomes damaging to them. The reason I like to apply this theory to my friendships is that it does help you see a bigger picture of the whole bond and not the element that just happened. If someone was to just take the reward that was just given to them, such as a friend helping them study all night, but doesn’t see the cost of that same friend leaving during the study session because her boyfriend called a toxic friendship could be formed. It is important to see both sides of the
...; With the use of applying this theory to an episode as a demonstration, an application, and then an explanation, it is easy to see how the Social Exchange theory is related to everyday situations. Not only can the theory be applied to amorous relationships, but to that of friendships. The utility of the theory is seen in just about every type of interaction and is key to better understanding why relationships, friendships, or any mutual interaction, for that matter, turn out being costly or rewarding.
It is hard for me to point out the greatest weakness of interpersonal communication, so, in this section, I will discuss about what I think as the most questionable part of interpersonal communication: Social Exchange Theory (SET). I will start with a brief summary of the theory, including some examples of its usage in some areas of research. Then, I will move to the reasons why I consider this as the most questionable part of interpersonal communication. I will end this section with a suggestion for future research.
One of the best offerings of social exchange theory is the thought that satisfaction is but one criterion that we apply to regulate relationship durability. Despite this support, social exchange theory does not suggest how of many relationship behaviors and outcomes. So, social learning theory is most useful for explaining how decisions about relationships are made. After analyzing the breakup reasons of the three couples of the show “How I Met Your Mother,” I found similarity in some reason and these reasons were common among three of them. The most common reason came from the observation was difference of opinions in couples. The other common reason were ambition or career issues, which is very common nowadays. Looking at the show and the intimate relationship between the couples in the show it’s very clear that couples are now more open and frank. No matter what are the reasons behind taking up a relationship for couples, but couples do measure the outcomes from an intimate relationship. They are not ready to compromise their own life for a relationship anymore. Where Ted and Robin broke up because of difference of opinion between them, there Lilly and Marshal had a break up because Lilly had argument about Lily’s desire to go San Francisco for art training. Barney and Robin on the other hand, are too much similar to each other, which creates difference of opinion between them. Robin had hard time trusting Barney, when Barney was actually trying to be faithful to Robin. Barney tried to become something, which he wasn’t at all, and this was making him miserable. So they had to finally decide to part ways. From this case study, I learnt no matter how much love or passion may be present between
My opinion is that the Social Exchange Theory is the best relationship formation shown in the film. Marty, the main character, has low self-esteem because he has been dumped before. His brother is married and people are pressuring him to get married. He did not believe he was attractive enough to find a girl that will find him interesting. However, at a dance he met this woman who was being dumped. I think that Marty decided to get to know that woman because they both share that similarity. Also he saw that she is a reserved woman that may end up linking him too. As a result, he saw benefits of where that relationship would lead to. He thought that there was a common personality between them two that they could built a relationship from that.
...hey are involved in a commitment. An attractive girl always seems to become a little more popular when she becomes single. The rating system exists today, but not like it did in the economy of dating that Bailey discussed. It is more of an approval rating by peers based on the person’s qualities that you are dating, not their popularity. Trying to define dating proved to be difficult because it is a hard term to define, and it means different people to different things. My synopsis of dating in the modern world could be totally altered from someone else’s. I tried to write about what I have seen though, and how dating appears to work in my peer group. I believe that the peer group that I have been involved with is a good control group for popular society. However, it is always going to be difficult to try to make a lot of generalizations on dating rituals.
Friends with benefits relationships consist of friends who are physically involved and participate in the occasional engagement of sexual activity, but otherwise have a basic friendship in which they are not romantically involved (Mongeau, Ramirez, & Vorell, 2003). This separation differentiates friends with benefits relationships (FWBRs) from other relationship types by creating a relational hybrid due to no future expectations of transitioning into a romantic relationship. Even though these relationships carry defining features of a romantic relationship, such as intimacy and sexual passion, FWB partners do not consider their involvements to be romantic relationships, but rather best regarded to as friends involved in casual sex. With many potential implications for understanding FWBRs dynamics more broadly, our understandings of these involvements are in an early stage due to a recent attraction to friends with benefits relationships.