Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast socialism and capitalism
Comparing capitalism, socialism and communism
Compare socialism vs capitalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast socialism and capitalism
Everybody tells lies. The biggest lies are told by Venezuelans’ politicians; they sell this beautiful misrepresentation of a socialist government. According to professor Foster, socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole. Nevertheless, the reality is far from the truth. Venezuelans’ citizens are going through the highest inflation rate in recorded history, lack of security and basic needs, and a collapsing economy. The key to save a dying nation is a radical change in the government system.
Dishonest and fraudulent conduct by those in power is exactly what happens in Venezuela. In fact, The
…show more content…
New York Times rated Venezuela as one of the 10 most corrupt countries in the world. Corruption has become a part of the culture. Nelson Leon made the statement,” Venezuela is in an economic depression”. The minimum wage is not a living wage and it impossible for Venezuelan citizens to feed their families since there is not enough money there is not enough food. In an interview, Venezuelan politician Leopoldo Lopez, informed the nation that the inflation rate has gone up to 487,6% in the last years. In addition, policemen have violated their promise to protect and serve the country as they enable crime and cause to ruin the nation. By consequence, making Venezuela a high crime rate nation, and ranked the most insecure nation in the world by Gallup in 2016 with the United Nations stating that such crime is due to the poor political and economic environment in the country. Therefore, a change is in need. In a nation filled with corruption, there is a desperate need for honest people to make a change, to implicate new laws and if they are not followed, strong punishments will be applied. With the right people in charge, a new government could be implemented. A democracy where people have a voice in the decision of the government, where policemen will follow the laws and be incorruptible. A place where the people stop worrying about basic needs. A democracy will help Venezuela rise into their former glory. The change is nothing but necessary.
There are still people that remember that Venezuela that was before, one that was vivacious and full of riches, the people who remember need to start a civil war. Many people will be lost in this fight, but is a price that Venezuela must pay if they want freedom. It’s easy to find the good politians as they’re in jail by now. The government stole their voice and the dreams they had for a prosperous Venezuela. Those politicians must come together and form a path to a better future, they need to make new laws and propose a new way of government to rule the nation. It is essential that they create a system of check and balances so if a branch of the government becomes corrupt, then the other ones can step up and fix it. Now that the politicians have a plan, they need a strong leader to enforce it. That choice belongs to the citizens. The leader they choose will need to pick up the pieces of a broken country to rehabilitate the country’s economy, safety, laws and lifestyle. The change will be effective immediately as it is a radical one, everything will change for the forthcoming Venezuela. During the rehabilitation process, the new generation must be educated with new values and an intense sense of nationalism because today’s children will be tomorrow’s
future. Venezuela cannot afford to continue in their current condition, the people are desperate. They don’t have food, security, or basic needs. It is outrages that a country so rich has so much poverty because the government is eating it away. The people need to take a stand and fight for their inalienable rights. If Venezuela is successful to overcome a corrupt government with all the odds against it this will inspire other countries that are full with corruption to also take a stand and fight for all that is good and right. Venezuela will be an example for the rest of the world.
From 1806 to 1826 most of the Latin countries under Spanish rule fought for their independence. The reason that caused these countries to have courage to fight for independence was because in 1808 Napoleon was able to invade and conquer Spain. Examples of those countries are Venezuela and Chile. There are similarities in the ways in which these two countries fought for their independence but there are also some differences in how they fought. Some of the leaders who were involved in the Venezuela’s fight for independence were Simon Bolivar, Francisco de Miranda and Antonio José de Sucre. The Venezuelan fight for independence against the Spanish empire began in 1811 and finally ended in 1823. The Venezuelan war was done in different phases, which began with Francisco de Miranda.
The Yarur textile factory played an important role in Chilean politics, and was the central role for the uprisings and downfalls in Chilean history. Its first key component was that it represented an economic empire based of paper and cloth that used these resources to gain political power through the aspect of having wealth. The second element of the Yarur factory that gave its importance in Chilean politics was that it represented a monopoly of Chile’s political capital. In Weavers of Revolution, Peter Winn depicts the relationship from a “revolution from above” and “revolution from below” and how the workers of the Yarur textile factory faced an on-going struggle between the working class and the government. Winn focuses his analysis of the Chilean road to socialism around the Yarur textile factory because it is through the modernization and changes of political, economic, and industrial policies that ultimately led to the workers movement to bring about a revolution.
He affirms that the twentieth century ideas of socialism and that it cannot work because of history’s “proof” that people are selfish and governments abuse power. However, he declares that notion “is too simple.” Furthermore, he questions if common sense is from the “utopian dreams of the past,” then why can Lincoln, Roosevelt, or Johnson’s ideas be reevaluated for the present day. In fact, he affirms that the idea that markets safeguard the democracy and freedom that the citizens of the United States hold so dearly is more utopian than those aforementioned. Concluding, he reiterates that by ignoring “socialist” ideas, the established government is doing a great “disservice” to the United States.
Analysis of Venezuela’s political history and current governmental systems, demonstrates former President Chávez designed the Executive Office to be the epicenter of the political system, and therefore a strategic COG. Within Venezuela’s present political system, Nicolas Maduro sits at the helm, leading the country through somewhat unstable political and economic times. To do this, he must persevere to sustain Venezuela’s sovereignty, safeguard its...
On July 14th, 17189, a shot was heard around the world: the Bastille had been stormed. Propelled by Enlightenment ideas, a rigid class system, and resentment with the monarchy, on this day the French decided to take matters in their own hands. In the next three years, the French overthrew their monarch and established a government and constitution that promised equal rights for all. As the saying goes, history repeats itself. So was the case in Latin America. By 1810, revolutionary fervor had spread to Venezuela. The revolution here was caused by similar reasons. As a colony of Spain, Venezuela did not have a representational government or equality for all its citizens. Peninsulares, or European-born Spaniards, held all the important governmental positions. Like the nobility in France, Peninsulares did not have to pay taxes. Their children (as long as they were also born in Europe), had many educational opportunities. Below the peninsulares were the creoles, or Venezuelans of Spanish descent. Creoles owned much of the land, but they were considered inferior to the peninsulares. Like the bourgeoisie in France, creoles had to pay high taxes and were subject to strict regulation. Creoles were disappointed in what they saw as social and political inequality, and desired to obtain self-representation in the government. At first hesitant, creoles declared their independence amid the weakening of the Spanish crown and the spread of the Enlightenment ideas. The Venezuelan Revolution was influenced by the French Revolution by the spread of Enlightenment ideas, social inequality, the discontent of creoles, and their desire to gain independence from France and form a new democratic government.
Since the 1970s, Venezuela has gone from being South America’s richest nation into a nouveau-poor society in search of an identity. Once known as the Saudis of the West, Venezuelans have seen their economic fortunes decline in exact proportion to the general fall in world oil prices. Even so, Venezuela’s many problems were hidden from view until relatively recently, when severity measures heralded the sort of economic crises so painfully familiar to other Latin American countries. Runaway inflation, currency devaluations and even food riots have marked this new phase in Venezuelan history, to which the country is still trying to adjust.
Cuba's socialist model has similarities with Venezuela, they both have the same root or ideal that has led to believe that they can achieve this political form, which can be set in a government where there is no doubt, resist or influence against repression of the United States; Castro and Chavez equals the same mechanism and the belief of his predestination to save their homelands. "Chavez has really embraced Castro's anti-Ame...
David Frum, CNN contributor and also editor at The Daily Beast. He is the author of eight books, including a new novel, "Patriots," and a post-election e-book, "Why Romney Lost." Frum was a special assistant to President George W. Bush from 2001 to 2002. The author in the article “Will Venezuela abandon Chavismo?” considerate the possibility of a changed in actual politics in Venezuela. He relate his own experiences, when he visited Venezuela in 2010, everybody was talking about elite Cuban paramilitary police units that Chavez had supposedly borrowed from Fidel Castro. But change is coming to Cuba too, and if the units ever existed, they certainly have not been visible in the past's week’s clashes. This article offers a good comparison between other countries situation and Venezuela.
...on, driving efficiency, and reducing corruption. The poor economy has caused civil unrest and an increase in crime rates. Violent mass protests are being held throughout the county demanding the government to fix the countless economic and security problems. Venezuela also has one of the highest murder rates in the region. These problems have brought instability and further damage the economy. The biggest surprise I have learned is that even with all these problems Venezuela is the happiest country in Latin America. I believe the main reason for this is that the government mostly looks after the poor working class which makes up most of the country’s population. Venezuela has many problems but I believe that with gradual liberalization, privatization, diversification of the economy, and more regional economic integration Venezuela can become a prosperous country.
Venezuela was one of the richest countries that emerged from the collapse of Gran Colombia in 1830 (the others being Colombia and Ecuador). For most of the first half of the 20th century, Venezuela was ruled by generally benevolent military strongmen, who promoted the oil industry and allowed for some social reforms. Democratically elected governments have held sway since 1959. Current concerns include: a polarized political environment, a politicized military, drug-related violence along the Colombian border, increasing internal drug consumption, overdependence on the petroleum industry with its price fluctuations, and irresponsible mining operations that are endangering the rain forest and indigenous peoples.
Food shortages, high inflation rates, protest, and violence: one sees these headlines in a Google search of Venezuela today. All around the country, there are long lines to buy simple necessities, like bread and milk. High inflation rates lead to shortages of food supplies, which increase frustration leading to protests in the streets and, sadly, an increase of violence. The protests and violence result from the inability of Venezuelans to provide the most basic human needs for their families. Sky-rocketing inflation rates in Venezuela are the result of Hugo Chavez, the former socialist and revolutionary leader of the country, and his administration. While in power, Chavez was so consumed with fixing the social issues in Venezuela, that other aspects of the country were ignored – like the economy. In 2014, Venezuela is left with a destroyed economy, angry people, and a government that is trying to fix the many issues the country currently faces; although the government is committed to finding solutions, the people of Venezuela do not feel the government is fixing the problems fast enough.
Throughout the fourteen years that remained in power Chávez followed strategy of introducing a socialist government in Venezuela in stages. According to Enrique Standish in the article titled “Venezuela Finally Turns Communist” it happened in four stages. The first stage consisted of obtaining t...
Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.
In 2011, Spain responded to the failure of the Socialist Party leadership to handle the economic crisis by electing our People’s Party to manage the economic recovery. We must address the multitude of anti-austerity protests we have seen across Spain over the past few years. Our government was voted in with a promise of economic recovery and revitalization. However, the progress we have seen in declining unemployment and increased GDP growth has done little for a majority of citizens who are still out of work and without crucial social
Socialism: a political theory of social organizations that have to follow the means of that production, distribution, and exchange should be managed by the community al together.