Social Work Case Study

715 Words2 Pages

Compare and contrast the engagement process of both of these case studies.
The social workers in both videos gathered information regarding each of the client’s issues. Another common denominator in both videos is that both of the social workers repeated what the client had said in their own words to allow the client to feel heard and understood. In the first video, social worker Karen asked direct questions relating to Mike’s alcohol addiction while also addressing how the addiction impacts his relationships including his marriage. Karen also addressed inconsistencies with the client doing so appropriately and quickly. It appears that in the first video, Karen focuses on the reality of the issue at hand to assist the client with establishing and accepting …show more content…

Karen applied a more reality based approach while engaging Mike in conversation of what his believes were and then providing a reality definition of his believes. James engagement style was based more on Anthony’s strengths and what Anthony enjoys. It appeared that Anthony was able to trust James allowing him to be honest and open about his likes, dislikes, behaviors, and issues. What techniques did the social workers use to lead the clients?
Both of the social workers used open-ended questions to lead the clients. The difference was that Karen used open-ended questions that required Mike to recognize that he did have an addiction in reality although he had made some changes it was not enough due to the way alcohol is still impacting his relationships and life. James asked open-ended questions that allowed Anthony to remain on one subject or change the subject. Another clear difference between the social workers was Karen was attempting to determine if alcohol was an issue for Mike while James was attempting to find out what the issues were. In what ways did the clients direct the social workers ' selected approach to

Open Document