Social Psychology In The Film 12 Angry Men

1227 Words3 Pages

Cooper Finch
Social Psychology
5/6/2014
12 Angry Men Paper
The film “12 Angry Men” has many different social psychology theories. This compelling film was written in the 1950’s and was about a twelve man jury that was sitting in on a case that dealt with an eighteen year old boy being tried for first degree murder. The boy’s father was stabbed in the chest with a four inch switch blade in his apartment.
The jurors listen to the trial then they go into another room to converse about the case and try and decide whether the kid is innocent or guilty. At first the jurors do not take the case serious, and the majority of them have other things that they would rather be attending too. For example, one gentleman votes guilty so that he could get done with the case and go catch a professional baseball game. The jurors decide to have a public vote when they first get in the room. Initially eleven of the twelve jurors vote guilty. This is critical because the vote needs to be unanimous to convict the young boy, otherwise there would be a hung jury. There was one gentleman, juror number 8 that took a critical thinking approach to the case. Through an intense conversation each juror gradually switched their minds to say that the kid was not guilty. All twelve of the jurors were swayed to a not guilty verdict.
In this paper I will talk about various social psychology theories and aspects that were discussed in class that were used in the movie as well. Some of the aspects and theories include heuristics, conformity, attitude and behavior, group process/influence, prejudice, discrimination, persuasion, and social beliefs. First, many of the jurors formed schemas that relied on heuristics that led them to stereotype the young boy. There were va...

... middle of paper ...

...d shouting coming from upstairs and then someone yelled “I’m going to kill you” then ten seconds later a loud thump hit the floor. He then stated that he saw the young boy running down the stairs and out to the streets. One of the jurors noticed that the old man was limping when he went to the stand to make his statement. The diagram of the apartment allowed the jury to act out how long it would have taken a man with a limp to make it from the bedroom, down the hallway and out the door to be able to see the boy in time. In the trial it was said that the man saw the boy fifteen seconds after the thump hit the floor. When the jury acted out the old man limping, it took a little over forty five seconds to be able to get to the door and unlock it. There was more unreasonable doubt in more of the jurors’ minds. They are inch by inch conforming to the not guilty verdict.

Open Document