Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social facilitation (literature) review paper
How others influence our behavior
Social facilitation (literature) review paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social facilitation (literature) review paper
Little of humans’ actions are carried out in isolation and thus, individual performance molds on and is shaped by the social context and, specifically, by activities performed by co-actors (Sebanz et al., 2003). As Albery et al. (2008) reasoned, other people may affect our performance on particular tasks and hence, we may even change the way we behave in terms of increasing the effort exerted towards a task in order to be favorably evaluated by others. This essay seeks to discuss the effects that the mere presence of other people have on individual performance and it is structured as following. The paper begins by introducing the concept of social facilitation. It will then go on to discuss a couple of theories that may offer a global understanding of the implications of social presence on individual performance.
The term ‘social facilitation’ was first used by Floyd Allport in 1920s and it postulates that, in terms of performance, an improvement of easy tasks and an impairment of difficult tasks may occur in the mere presence of conspecifics (Hogg and Vaughan, 2008). In other words, individuals are prone to perform better if they deal with a well-learned task than if they perform a rather unfamiliar or poorly learned assignment under certain circumstances and therefore, for the latter, the achievement deteriorates considerably. In essence, what social facilitation outlines is that, the individual performance can be affected by the presence of viewers. Corespondingly, according to Zajonc (1965), the main reason behind this is that the actual existence of an audience elevates drive levels. Although this may be true, the presence of others does not always make people perform better (Baumeister and Bushman, 2011).
Triplett (1898) h...
... middle of paper ...
..., 129, 183-190
Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340
Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2008). Social psychology 5th Ed. Harlow: Pearson Education
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own ?. Cognition, 88 (2003), B11-B21. Max Plank Institute for Psychological Research
Thompson, R. (2002). Are two heads better than one ? The Psychologist, 15(12), 616-619
Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9, 507-533.
Weiss, R. F, & Miller, F. G. (1971). The drive theory of social facilitation. Psychological Review, 78, 44-57.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, New Series, 149 (3681), 269-274
The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593
Myers, David G. “Chapter 14: Social Psychology.” Psychology. 10th ed. New York, NY US: Worth
Higgins, Tory. “Self-Discrepancy Theory: What Patterns of Self-Beliefs Cause People to Suffer?”(1989). Advances in Experimental Social psychology, Vol.22 (1989):93-136. Academic Press Inc.
Gross, R (2010). Psychology: The science of mind and behaviour. 6th ed. London: Hodder Education. p189.
In the fallowing paper I will be talking about the article “The Automaticity of Social Life,” by John A. Bargh. For those of you that aren’t familiar with the word Automaticity, let me give you a brief explanation, automaticity is when you do something unconsciously or from force of habit. In the article Bargh talks about automaticity from different perspectives. He gives us a couple experiences that he did in different types of occasions.
Crisp, R, J. Turner, R, N. (2007). Essential Social Psychology. Sage Publications Limited. London. (UK). First Edition.
...onson, E., Wilson, T.D., & Akert, R.M. (2013). Social Psychology (8th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Gall, S. B., Beins, B., & Feldman, A. (2001). The gale encyclopedia of psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 271-273). Detroit, MI: Gale Group.
Bloom, Leonard. Some Comments Upon Recent Trends in Social Psychology. N.p.: Journal of Social Phycology, Apr. 1961. PDF.
Social influence is the process whereby attitudes and behaviour are influenced by the real or implied presence of other people (Hogg & Vaughan, 2011). There are three types of social influence compliance, obedience, and conformity. This essay will focus on conformity and obedience. These issues will be examined by considering classic studies and contemporary implications.
People interact with other humans every day, whether it be in a group or individual setting. When people interact with others, it can be a good or bad experience. While at work, school, or even home, people are in constant contact with each other in some form. When we are children, our friends and family influence us. As we age, our peers continue to influence us. Social influence is studying how people are affected by interacting with each other and is an interesting part of what makes us unique (Matlin, 2013). In order to understand social influence, it needs to be looked at in three main categories: conformity, compliance, and obedience. Conformity, compliance, and obedience are important factors to understanding social influence.
Akers and Burgess posit that people observe the social interactions around them, and the rewards or punishments from those social behaviors (Williams III & McShane, 2014). Frequency and duration of repeated behaviors are more likely in making that person it is positively reinforced, or less likely if it is negatively reinforced.
(2004) Psychology (2nd European edition). Essex: Pearson Education Limited Gross, R (1996).Psychology, The Science of mind and behaviour (3rd Ed). London: Hodder & Stoughton
Hewstone, M. Fincham, F. and Foster, J (2005). Psychology. Oxford: The British Psychological Society, and Blackwell Publishing. P3-23.
Edited by Raymond J. Corsini. Encyclopedia of Psychology, Second Edition, Volume 1. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.