Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child - parent relationship
Interpersonal conflict full essay
Child - parent relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child - parent relationship
As young adults, we have already been through several different types and examples of interpersonal conflicts, whether it be with family, friends, boyfriends, coworkers, et cetera, but they were probably not incredibly serious ordeals, hopefully climaxing in a fight, and concluding with a mutually agreeable solution. The interpersonal conflict I am going to detail in this paper is not one of those examples, instead, it is still ongoing, its final conclusion undetermined. Through the struggles between my dad and me, I will explain the social penetration theory and why it must have two equally participating parties in order to be successful. The social penetration theory states that the closer two people become, the deeper their connection …show more content…
I became even more selfish and shallow than I'd been previously and hid all of my choices from my parents. The only thing my dad knew about was my grades, and he asked me why I had thrown away the relationship that he thought was a solid, tight bond. When I finally told him about one of the biggest decisions in my life after lying to him about it for a very long time, he told me he was done with me. And my world collapsed, I was nothing if I couldn’t rely on my father’s love for me. My parents brought me home and asked me to decide to change, and do better, or to stay on my path and to be not welcome in their house anymore. When I was first given this choice I was upset and angry, how dare they ask me for that, it has nothing to do with anything that’s going on, but I decided that losing my family would be the worst choice I could ever make, and I didn’t want to end up like all the bad examples of people I know who made the wrong decision. I realized that I had hurt my dad deeply, I had not only lied to him but I had broken a promise, and he blamed himself for the path I was going down. We talked and argued, I shouldered all the blame, told him I didn’t want this that I wanted to be better, and he still blamed himself. He
I was awful young enough to not fully be aware of the entire situation. What I did know was that I didn’t want to move into a new house, attend a new school, and definitely not live without my dad. Adapting to my new and different surroundings was very hard for me. I was upset with my dad for his actions because he was the cause of all the changes. I was mainly angry with my mom though for her decision. To my eight year old self, I felt as if it wasn’t fair. I was her precious girl and entire world and I knew she would do anything to see my happy. For that particular reason was why i couldn 't comprehend her decision. I wasn 't happy with the outcome, I hoped she would forgive him and we could be a family
The Social Bond Theory is concerned with the functions that social relationships play in people’s lives and the bonds they develop with others and institutions to avoid criminal behavior (Walsh 81). There are four elements to the Social Bond Theory. The first is attachment. This is the emotional bond that is developed with social environments and individuals like your family, friends, and school. Attachment leads people to feel they are appreciated, accepted, and loved.
The Social Penetration model demonstrated two way in which communication can be more or less disclosing. The model is like an onion with layers. The first dimension is known as breadth, which is the range of the subjects being discussed, which with an onion as demonstration would be the outer layers. Second is depth, the depth level is significant and more central to ourselves, In the onion this would be the inner and core. The inner and core layers are the things with most private and significant to us. Thus, sharing information from our depth may require greater risk taking. The information from this dimension of self is typically known by and held in confidence by only a few people. Due to the fact
I sat across the table from my dad while he stared at me with a disbelieving look on his face. My mom sat to the right of me with tears in her eyes. She could see my pain as well as my dads, and she knew the war that was about to start between my own father and me. My brother sat to the left of me making comments that only made the situation worse. I could feel myself dying inside as my heart began to break. I had no idea how to deal with the situation that I had gotten myself into. My new boyfriend was mixed in races, and my dad was totally against it. I sat there crying while trying to make him understand, saying things like, "Dad, he's a person not a color." But, it was like talking to a brick wall. My dad was brought up with the belief that races do not mix under any circumstances. I did not realize that dating someone whom was not completely of my race would tear my dad and I apart. We had talked about it before, but I did not think he would react the way that he did. The words and fights that followed tore me apart. I went from being near perfect in my fathers eyes to being a "spoiled, selfish brat" whom supposedly only cared about myself. I could not believe those words were coming out of my dad's mouth. Things got so bad that I did everything I could to stay away from home for as long as I could. I even tried to move out. I got yelled at every time I walked through the door. I went from being great to not being able to do anything right, and it all happened over night. To make things worse, some of my friends started to look at me in different ways too. If I wasn't around, they would say things like, "I can't believe Lori is a nigger lover." Others talked about me and said what I was doing was immoral.
It all started in high school, as a person, I was far from being responsible. School was just a place to meet friends, spent most of my time playing around, and never thought about the future. But gradually, my parents were getting worried about me. One night, I was in my room when they called, and asked me to go to the living room. I looked at their faces and I knew that we were going to have a serious conversation, and I was right. They tried to give me an advice, an advice on how time flies and I never had the ability to turn it back. That life was about making the right decision, and there were options and opportunities presented to me. Whether they were good or bad, I need to think of what was best for me and made a decision on which options or opportunities I would take, so I had not regretted my decision later on in my life. When I heard this, I realized that all this time, I had been wasting time playing around and I need to think about the future. For a couple of days, I was weighing my option left and right about what to do after graduated. Should I go straight to...
This theory describes how relationships develop from the superficial to the intimate level and from few to many areas of interpersonal interaction. Just like Knapp's model there are stages to forming a relationship. In this theory though we learn about the breadth, the number of topics you and your partner talk about and the depth, the degree to which you penetrate the inner personality of the other individual. The textbook provides us with a figure that helps visualize the breadth and depth of our relationships. This is called Models of Social Penetration, in this model we see three circles labeled circle one, two, and three. Circle one is the superficial level where the relationship had low breadth and a small depth. This relates to when my father and I first moved in together, things were a bit awkward we talked some but about normal daily things such as tv shows and things I did at school that day things that are not so personal. The second circle becomes more intense, the topics get more serious. This stage was when my dad became more relaxed around me and started asking me questions about my family and about my feelings. Lastly is circle three. This one is the most in depth and has the most breadth, the book states that this is a relationship you might have with a lover or a parent. This stage finally hit my father and I when we became one hundred percent comfortable around eachother and get a special bond. this
Social bonding theory was a theory derived from the ideas of Travis Hirschi. The social bonding theory was the theory that suggested that a person’s personal attachments, beliefs, involvements and commitments are what controls their chance of delinquency. Studies have shown that when
The Social Penetration Theory (SPT) by Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor (1973) provides a framework for describing the development of interpersonal relationships between individuals. During the development, SPT explains the way of two individuals communicate and how the relationship evolve from superficial to intimate and vice versa. Onion analogy is commonly used in explaining SPT in depth that people personalities are much like onions, made up of many layers. The theory of social penetration works when people gradually peel off one layer of their personality at a time until the core of the personality is reached. During the interpersonal development along two related dimensions which are breadth (number of topics used to discuss) and depth
An episode that best characterizes the Social Exchange theory is one that involves my ex-girlfriend, and myself. We had been having our share of problems when, one day, every argument and disagreement we had culminated into this moment when everything just seemed to explode. She had been angry with me for having left San Diego to attend school in Santa Barbara and I was angry with her for her being angry. I wanted support, and instead, all I received was a guilt trip about how I was never there for her. After five minutes of talking, or rather complaining, we both agreed to disagree. In that instant the two of us had the realization, as many couples do, that it just was not working and the negatives far outweighed the positives. There was no minimizing the negative outcomes because everything had a negative ending. Later, the Social Exchange theory will be
George Herbert Mead forwarded the Symbolic interaction theory that comprises of three principles; meaning, language, and thought. The theory asserts that people give particular meanings to objects, events, and actions, and hence behave according to these interpretations (Griffin, Ledbetter & Sparks, 2015, p. 54). Individuals use the different interpretations they accord to others to form social bonds. They decide on who to interact with and who not and how to do so. The Symbolic Interaction theory proposes the concept of “the looking glass self” where people mind what others think of them. Individuals create their self-concept and self-identity from interacting with others. Regarding interpersonal relationships, the symbolic interaction theory argues that people decide on whom to
In conclusion, Social Bond Theory has been around for many years and has stood the test of time. The four bonds, attachment, involvement, commitment and belief are all held by individuals and play a major part in determining criminality. While it does not describe deviance perfectly, it does match what is believed to be the basic human view of why people become criminals. The view of Social Bond Theory is that all humans are basically evil and that deviance is a natural process. It is just a matter of how weak or strong these bonds are that either promotes, or deters deviance.
The purpose of this literary analysis is to determine if social networks are helpful or harmful to relationships. As social networking evolves, different aspects of communication suffer. Such as the social penetration theory, which “describes people as onions with several layers of information”. pressed tightly together in the cuff. The outermost layer consists of the kind of information you would get.
The Social Self Theory is distinguishing “Me”, “Myself”, and “I” apart. As well as knowing the different stages of it. Symbolic Interactionism is basically shared senses, positions, and beliefs that causes them to act and behave the way they do. One is brought into society and is affected and influenced by everything, including religion, education, the norms, the roles of their gender, and etc. The more you grow, the more you learn new things and senses by your social experiences. A fair example would be a small girl, playing by herself in a playground, and
There was simply no purpose in talking about my problems with them, because there was no vision of escaping the loop of failure. When they tried to reach out to me, there’s seems to be a way to close the door on them. The American dream was closing on me, that my parents worked so hard to provide to my brothers and I, all of it was falling down, and I was lying about it. Just like that, it was a matter of time that trust that was behold between my parents and me, was gone like my dream of college, at least at the time I thought this was
Right before I moved in some truths, came to light. It turns out that our parents were dating. I was all for it. I truly believed my dad deserved to be happy. We were the only ones who knew about it because they were trying to be sneaky, but I had got a hold of my dads phone one morning when the text came in. It was talking about how last night was great, that they enjoyed kissing each other, and how they still had a smile on their face. I couldn’t tell anyone because he didn’t know I knew and I knew the outcome wo...