Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Social Disorganization Theory is an intriguing theory
The correlation between crime and poverty
The Social Disorganization Theory is an intriguing theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Social Disorganization theory originated from the University of Chicago also known as the “Chicago school” in 1972. The Chicago School was originally known for its sociology department and later recognized for its’ achievements in criminology. Combining ecological studies with field work in the Chicago area is what developed this school into a balanced, urban research facility. Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay, two criminology researchers, developed the Social Disorganization theory off of a previous researchers’ findings. In 1942, Edwin Sutherland began to explain the ecological differences in crime rates. Shaw and McKay modernized and continued this framework by researching and concluding their findings on the relationship between delinquency …show more content…
The students concluded where these social problems began. In 1910, when the Chicago’s population was at such a drastic increase, between migrating citizens for work as well as immigrants, resulted in a huge number of homeless people. With the desire of the American Dream, individuals would do anything to be in Chicago. Shaw and McKay took all of these findings and created their theory. They began with using the census data and created spot maps of the crime rates and their locations, as well as the type of crime that was committed. The two researchers found that there is a much higher rate of delinquency crimes that involve alcoholism, drug abuse, theft, etc. among the lower class. The Social Disorganization theory explains that the ecological location of an individuals is primarily responsible for the delinquency crimes they commit. The environment that an individual is raised in or currently resides either shapes them as a person or eventually plays a part of their everyday life. This theory was categorized into three main components; poverty, residential instability and racial heterogeneity. Crime in …show more content…
The social dynamics through out this city are determined by affiliations of individuals who relate to each other. At this point in an individuals life, they are most vulnerable as well as easily influenced. In other words, gangs and groups of delinquent juveniles are the perfect example in relation to the topic. Groups of individuals that offer things like safety or status is ideal in Detroit which results in the increase or preservation of these groups, inhabiting the ability for change. With this type of behavior being so common, exposure is inevitable and refraining is difficult. Social Disorganization explains how this exposure shapes individuals into the life of crime. This reoccurring cycle of criminal activity and ecological response is the base of this theory. While researching this city, there were many disturbing images and statistics especially while involved a juvenile as young as ten years old. This ten year old has to knowledge of life beyond his surroundings, crime is the social norm. This type of influence on the youth is detrimental to
He is a decorated veteran, scholar and successful business leader upon graduating. In comparison to the other Wes Moore who never seemed to escape his childhood and ended up in prison. The theory that best explains the authors’ noninvolvement in a life of crime vs. the criminality of the other Wes Moore is the social disorganization theory. Shaw and McKay, the founders of this theory, believed that “juvenile delinquency could be understood only by considering the social context in which youths lived. A context that itself was a product of major societal transformations wrought by rapid urbanization, unbridled industrialization, and massive population shifts” (Lilly, Cullen & Ball, 2015). The theory is centered around transitional zones and competition determined how people were distributed spatially among these zones (Lilly et al., 2015). This model founded by Ernest Burgess showed that high priced residential areas were in the outer zones and the inner zones consisted of poverty (Lilly et al.,
Two major sociological theories explain youth crime at the macro level. The first is Social Disorganization theory, created in 1969 by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay. The theory resulted from a study of juvenile delinquency in Chicago using information from 1900 to 1940, which attempts to answer the question of how aspects of the structure of a community contribute to social control. The study found that a community that is unable to achieve common values has a high rate of delinquency. Shaw and McKay looked at the physical appearance of the neighborhoods, the average income of the population, the ethnicity of the neighborhood, the percent of renters versus owners, and how fast the population of the area changed. These factors all contribute to neighborhood delinquency.
Residential inequality created by Macrosocial patterns is an important factor of violence and crime in poor inner city neighborhoods. This leads to social isolation of poor blacks and ecological concentration of of blacks and other disadvantaged people. The structural barriers include good schools and universities,employment opportunities, protection by the police, institutions like churches, and more barriers from organized community organizations. The people of these communities have fewer legal opportunities compared to the middle class to achieve success in legal ways and can influence the involvement in crime to find success and
These crime-ridden communities (or ghettos) are springing up all through the country, mainly in and around major metropolitan areas. These areas are the most populated, so that means that within these areas are the most people there to be influenced by the crimes committed by fellow people. In Male's reading he shows statistics that prove the fact that once the poverty factor is taken away then teen violence disappears. He later adds, “That if America wants to rid of juvenile violence than serious consideration needs to be given to the societally inflicted violence of raising three to 10 times more youth in poverty than other Western nations.” (Males p386)
The broken windows theory argues that if one broken window is not repaired, then a domino effect will follow and gradually more windows will be broken. This theory is argued by Wilson and Kelling, and they say that if a window is left broken, then no one really cares about the community, so more and more windows will continuously break without punishment. The main argument of this theory is that if a community is fully of crime, and they do not do anything about it, then crime will continuously happen. Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization can be connected to the broken windows theory. The main argument of the social disorganization theory is that a poor sense of community and weak social controls cause crime. So if you live in a bad neighborhood
Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization theory had a profound impact on the study of the effects of urbanization, industrialization and immigration in Chicago neighborhood on crime and delinquency rates. However, Shaw and McKay faced much criticism when they first released their findings. One criticism of the social disorganization theory had to do with researcher’s ability to accurately test the social disorganization theory. Although Shaw and McKay collected data on characteristics of areas and delinquency rates for Chicago communities and were able to visually demonstrate a relationship between by using maps and other visuals, their research did not have an actually test that went along with it (Kurbin, 2010). Kurbin (2010) states that “the
The disciplines of the fields of criminal justice have always been about the real and imagined differences between criminals and non-criminals. Theoretical explanations of crime and crime control, regardless of the perspective, have sought to make sense out of different social factors such as gender, racial and ethnic background, and social class. In the process of sorting out these differences, virtually every theoretical framework has addressed them, and many are debating whether or not these variables matter. It is clear, that after the criminal acts, a clear pattern can be identified to show the how the juvenile ended up on this path (Deling,
In this film review, I will define social disorganization theory, and I will make a correlation connection between Crash (2004) and the Concentric Zone Model. My interpretation of social disorganization theory comes from Criminology Goes to the Movies: Crime Theory and Popular Culture, written by Nicole Rafter and Michelle Brown. Social Disorganization theory arose from the first half of the twentieth century. In addition, the Prohibition was in effect, “the period from 1919 to 1933 during which the sale, manufacture, and transportation of alcohol for consumption were illegal” (Rafter & Brown;2011, Pg. 68). Robert E. Park and Ernest Burgess argued in order understand crime, they must consider “it’s social roots, and explanatory framework that
Sampson and Groves (1989) demonstrated that through the analysis of British Crime Data, ecological characteristics, such as poverty and residential mobility, influenced both informal social control and neighborhood cohesion, therefore showing that social disorganization was in fact a good predictors of rates of crime victimization and explaining the rates of criminal victimization. Due to how strongly related cohesion and control were, Sampson later coined the term collective efficacy and proposed it was the key mechanism in predicting neighborhood violence, thereby explaining higher or lower levels of crime in a community or neighborhood (Sampson, Raudenbush, and Earls, 1997; Sampson 2008). The two important dimensions of collective efficacy in which Sampson noted were social cohesion and mutual support and shared norms or expectations for social control (Sellers and Akers,
However, social disorganization theory best explains low socioeconomic status because it best demonstrates why youths from low social position on the basis of income and occupation are more likely to join gangs. Social disorganization theory posits that Poor families from different ethnic backgrounds are more likely to reside in disorganized neighborhoods with high rates of unemployment, and that the economic condition of a community plays an active role in crime involvements (Lilly et al. 2015). Studies suggest that lack of finances and inadequate welfare services influences youth to engage in illegal activities to provide for their families (Alleyne and Wood 2014; Young et al. 2014). Youth engagement in gang activity could be as a result of a family’s inability to meet economic needs in the community (Alleyne and Wood 2014). Yiu and Gottfredson (2014) found that there was an increased proportion of gang involvement among youths who were living below the 1.25 poverty level and families who were without a job. Furthermore, as a result of economic deprivation in poor communities, regulations of youths are weakened as social institutions are strained (Lilly et al. 2015). This is mainly because with youths providing funds for the family, parents as well as other conventional institutions lose the power to supervise their activities in
Social Disorganization theory explains how a person becomes a criminal due to the fact that are isolated from a positive environment and mainstream culture. They are then put into an impoverished and underdeveloped neighborhoods have their own set of norms and values unlike the mainstream culture. Basically meaning that the mixture low income living, minority groups, and a breakdown of the traditional family is the causation of crimes in these areas. The policy implications developed for the social disorganization theory focus on the high-crime neighborhoods itself instead of focusing on the people. By creating community organizations and merging wider networks such as social, political, and economic resources. The policy also addresses the
Shaw and Henry D. McKay who set out to figure out why normal human beings become delinquent by creating three maps of Chicago (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). By doing this, Shaw and McKay attempted to determine the reasons why human beings who are considered to be normal acted in delinquent ways. Spot maps were used to find where the youth’s resided based off of their police and court records, rate maps showed the percentage of the total juvenile population in Chicago that had police or court records, and zone maps showed the rates of male juveniles that were delinquents within Chicago’s zones (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). As a result of the study in Chicago, they determined that delinquents were not much different from non-delinquents in regards to physical and personal traits. They did determine that cities such as Chicago and other big cities suffered from social disorganization because the “usual controls over delinquents are largely absent, delinquent behavior is often approved of by parents and neighbors, many opportunities are available for delinquent behavior, and little encouragement, training, or opportunity exists for legitimate employment” (Bohm & Vogel, 2011, p.
Research supports the claim that population characteristics and socioeconomic composition can be used, at least in part, to explain variations in neighborhood violent crime. Based on Shaw and McKay’s social disorganization theory: low economic status, ethnic heterogeneity and residential mobility should increase delinquency within urban neighborhoods. The intent of the current study is to explore whether structural antecedents contribute to the proliferation of violent crime within the lower unit of aggregation. Even though ethnic heterogeneity is one of the assessment instruments in Shaw and McKay’s research, the use of ethnicity is not incorporated as an explanatory variable in the current study based on the fact that methodological dilemma
Kawachi, Ichiro, Bruce P. Kennedy, and Richard G. Wilkinson. "Crime: social disorganization and relative deprivation." Social Science & Medicine 48.6 (1999): n. pag. Electronic Journal Center. Web. 26 Feb. 2014.
In conclusion, we can see that violent crime rates are higher in urban areas than rural. We can see from the factors such as neighborhood instability, ethnic diversity, family disruption, economic status and density that both are directly affected by social disorganization, but urban cities do manage to hold higher violent crime rates. Urban and rural communities are both affected by social disorganization, however, the social disorganization of urban communities is more important to research in order to hopefully prevent future deviance and prevent violent crime in relation to social disorganization.