Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Teaching method constructivism
Teaching method constructivism
Teaching method constructivism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Teaching method constructivism
Kundi and Nawaz (2010) define social constructivism (SC) as “collective learning” through wireless computing, which places stakeholders to clarify distinct conceptions and maintains shared understanding between teachers-students and peer-peer (Kundi & Nawaz, 2010; Weston & Bain, 2010). Dewey (1916/1997), Papert (1993/2000), Piaget (1932/1997), and Vygotsky (1978/1981) described SC as an alternative approach to promote the process of learning through constructing meaning while acquiring knowledge, instead of memorizing the introduced concepts (Kundi & Nawaz, 2010). Furthermore, Bruner’s (1986) theory of SC articulates that the central concerns of educating learners need to focus on how to construct appreciation in the minds of learners. Globally the possibility exits through meaning and reality by constructing knowledge, rather than discovery (Gultepe, Yeldirim & Sinan, 2008; Ryu & Parsons, 2009; Kundi & Nawaz, 2010). According to Bruner (1986) SC also emphasis the compromising of acquired knowledge derives from the art of building alternative meanings. The establishment of the SC theory suggests that teaching and learning with wireless technology resources (Weston & Bain, 2010) enables individuals to fine-tune their relations through social interaction while re-establishing reality, to restructure the art of learning. Based on recent research, historically the social constructivism (SC) approach to teaching is more successful than traditional teaching (Cetindamar, Phaal, & Probert, 2009; Ryu, Parsons, Li, Sheng & Javed, 2009; Kundi & Nawaz, 2010). For example, traditional lecture has faced scrutiny as not actively engaging students in the subject matter (Ryu, Parsons, Li, Sheng & Javed, 2009). Studies have confirmed that th... ... middle of paper ... ..., Google, and the Apple Learning. Interchange resourceful models by adopting successful strategies to promote teacher on-line collaboration. Furthermore, Wellings and Levine (2009) also suggested that teachers develop a setting for suitable and receptive learning where students construct meaning by linking their existing skills to acquired skills. Conduct sessions to prepare for state mandated assessments. To prepare diverse learner with state mandated assessments, differentiate instructional practices through interactive software, games and activities (Wellings & Levine, 2009). Therefore, differentiating instructional practices effectively demands a change of attitude of reluctant teachers to accept technology usage in their instructional practices (Su Luan & Teo, 2009) and apply the concept of social constructivism (SC) to promote constructive social change.
Furthermore, social constructivism allows students to be presented with the same learning experience while giving them the ability to experience it in a way personal to them. I understand we all have varying life experiences that influences our perception of things in the world around us. I fully intend to help guide students to the knowledge needed to be successful, but I will not influence how they apply their knowledge to life experiences. I strongly feel an educator should not be a dictator in the classroom, but instead only a guide to help assist students in testing the capability of their own learning. A social constructivist class is set up in a manner conducive to such and affords students and teachers the opportunity to nurture such style. I place great value on making sure the environment is fair, safe, and welcoming to all. My management style will allow students to feel secure and comfortable to question learning processes and reflect on the “hows” and “whys” without feeling as if they are questioning authority which can often happen in a teacher centered classroom unfortunately. My student centered
Powell, K. Kalina, C. (2009). Cognitive and Social Constructivism: Developing Tools for an Effective Classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/pqdweb?did=1937522441&Fmt=7&clientId=22212&RQT=309&VName=PQD. (Document ID: 1937522441).
The way in which the body is viewed is a complete social construction, dependent on the society, history and wider cultural attitude of a given group. Social constructionism can be defined as the ways in which society, culture and history builds up and dictates social norms. It shapes the way we think, behave and interact with our environment. The social construction of bodies is, therefore, the way in which society ascribes significance to different parts of the body and influences our understanding of it as a whole. The social construction of the body feeds into and reinforces inequalities to a great extent, on a number of levels. Gender inequalities and the issues of racism and colourism are good examples of inequalities that are fuelled
Empiricists and rationalists have proposed opposing theories of the acquisition of knowledge, which appear unable to coexist. Each theory holds its own strengths but does not demonstrate a strong argument in itself to the questions, “Is knowledge truly possible?” and “How is true knowledge obtained?”. Immanual Kant successfully merged the two philosophies and provided a convincing argument with his theory of empirical relativism, or what some may call constructivism. His theory bridges the gap between rationalism and empiricism and proves that empiricists and rationalists each present a piece of the full puzzle. In order to truly understand Kant’s epistemology, one must first review and understand both empiricism and rationalism on an impartial basis.
Constructivism represents a paradigm shift form education based on cognitive theories. This concept assumes that learners construct their own knowledge on the basis of interaction with their environment. (Gagnon & Collay, 200?) The role of the teacher as a constructor of the learning experience to ensure authentic curriculum and assessment which is responsive to the skills, needs and experiences of the learner, within established curriculum framework and with the reference to the achievement of literacy, numeracy, retention and attainment of outcomes. Krause, Bochner and Duchesne (p.157) comment that “as learners interact with their environment, they link information learned through experience to previous knowledge, and so construct new understandings and knowledge.” Constructivism then inturn encourages Teachers and Learning Managers to recognise the value of prior knowledge and experiences that each child brings with them into the classroom, and help them (the students) build on their understandings of the world by providing appropriate learning experience plans.
Furze et al observe, “The school of sociological thought known as social constructionism emphasises that various social problems, including crime, are not inherent in certain actions themselves” (Furze et al, 2012, p.382). How instead do social constructionists suggest the problems might arise?
This meta-synthesis research analyzed 17 primary data sets to investigate the impact of a VCoP on the professional development of online instructors. The findings unveiled an interesting discernment of the faculty experiences and how learning through social constructivism can occur within a VCoP. Based on the research findings and 10 emergent themes, five overarching dimensions were compiled to synthesize and discuss the results further. These are (1) social nature of online learning; (2) faculty participation in a VCoP; (3) acquisition of knowledge and skills; (4) enhanced teaching and learning practices; and (5) overall impact of a VCoP on FPD. These overarching dimensions specifically accentuate on my theoretical framework, independent
In July 2017 James Damore, a senior engineer at Google, released his memo titled “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber,” which stated that women were biologically and psychologically not suited toward careers in technology. This memo did echo around, but not for the reasons Damore wished. Instead, once the memo gained traction, Damore was fired from Google. His memo reflects that people often see differences between men and women as natural and biological, and that it can have disastrous consequences for women in the workforce when their coworkers or bosses have these ideologies. Unlike what Damore states, gender differences and expectations are socially constructed not naturally existing.
...nstructivism. Core to social constructivism practices is the creation of a social environment where students can use language to communicate, collaborate and socially interact with each other to learn. The prevalence of constructionist principals in current education attests to the importance of Vygotskys’ theories and their successful application in the classroom.
Do you ever think about how much technology has changed the way we work, learn, play, and even think? Technology is a major beneficiary to society; especially in the classroom where we get the opportunity to learn and grow. In recent years, schools have begun implementing tablets and other devices in the classroom to better student’s education. The use of technology in the classroom provides more of a personalized learning experience and gives students a widespread availability to engage in learning. Technology is necessary in today’s modern globe, it is basically “the pen and paper of our time and the lens through which we experience much of our world” (Warlick, 2013). Technology is not just considered the “internet”, it is so much greater than that. Overall, it enhances the quality of education and engages students deeper than ever before. With all the significant gains, why would people argue that technology hinders students more than it helps? Critics may try to repute the use of technology in the classroom but I believe what really matters “is the way we use it, the context that we use it in, and the learners who we use it for” (Chong, 2012).
Social constructionism originated as an attempt to come to terms with how reality is constructed, and knowledge is produced (Galbin, 2014). Its roots are connected to disciplines such as the ethnomethodology, sociology, anthropology, and psychology (Kham, 2013), and the works of Immanuel Kant, Berger and Luckman, Schutz, and Kunh, among others (ibid). In turn it acknowledges the influence of Mead, the originator of symbolic interactionism (Andrews, 2012). It may be defined as a perspective which believes that human life exists as it does due to social and interpersonal influences (Gergen, 1985). Its interest lies in interpreting the social influences on society and individual life.
Con: Constructivism classrooms do not have much room for structure (Rhinehart Neas). For new teachers, structure is important to maintain to have control of the classroom. Constructivism is meant for classrooms that can be more student centered than teacher controlled. For new teachers this method could not work very well. Another problem with constructivism is that students may not have the prior knowledge to begin a new lesson (Rhinehart Neas). The student that does not understand is also going to be the student who does not ask for help. Therefore, the teacher sometimes does need to teach and not just be a guide.
Among many teaching styles and learning theories, there is one that is becoming more popular, the constructivist theory. The constructivist theory focuses on the way a person learns, a constructivist believes that the person will learn better when he/she is actively engaged. The person acts or views objects and events in their environment, in the process, this person then understands and learns from the object or events(P. Johnson, 2004). When we encounter a certain experience in our life, we think back to other things that have occurred in our life and use that to tackle this experience. In a lot of cases, we are creators of our own knowledge. In a classroom, the constructivist theory encourages more hands-on assignments or real-world situations, such as, experiments in science and math real-world problem solving. A constructivist teacher constantly checks up on the student, asking them to reflect what they are learning from this activity. The teacher should be keeping track on how they approached similar situations and help them build on that. The students can actually learning how to learn in a well-planned classroom. Many people look at this learning style as a spiral, the student is constantly learning from each new experience and their ideas become more complex and develop stronger abilities to integrate this information(P. Johnson, 2004). An example of a constructivist classroom would be, the student is in science class and everyone is asking questions, although the teacher knows the answer, instead of just giving it to them, she attempts to get the students to think through their knowledge and try to come up with a logical answer. A problem with this method of learning is that people believe that it is excusing the role of...
Most living creatures abide by a social structure of some sort. Between groups of animals there is the dominance of the Alpha and the submission of the Omega. Among humans there is a similar setup, but rather than size and strength, it depends mainly on circumstance. A person’s circumstance often includes wealth, reputation, and social standing, and a lack of the things seems like an inferiority. Some embrace this shortsightedness, while others fight to change it.
Constructivism is a philosophy of learning founded on the premise that, by reflecting on our experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world we live in. Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply the process of adjusting our mental models to accommodate new experiences. The purpose of learning is for an individual to construct his or her own meaning, not just memorize the “right” answers and regurgitate someone else’s meaning. Since education is inherently interdisciplinary, the only valuable way to measure learning is to make the assessment part of the learning process, ensuring it provides students with information on the quality of their learning. Assessment becomes part of the learning process so that students play a larger role in judging their own progress.