Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When an environment of fear is presented to a group of people, you begin to see a shift in social structures. Secondly, you begin to see those effected becoming paranoid not only of those initiating the environment, but also of each other. This is expressed in The Spy, by Bertolt Brecht. In The Spy, a German family has just finished lunch. The mother and father began to speak of what is happening to the country, forgetting of their son’s presence in the room. Once the boy leaves, his parents become fearful that he has gone to report them to the Hitler youth. Upon his return, having gone to buy chocolate, the parents are still suspicious of the boy. This fear is brought on by the possibility of punishment from the government, which has caused …show more content…
In society, there is a natural order of things. Teachers are authoritative figures to students, and bosses don’t fear their workers. This is simply how things are done, but when an environment of fear and pressure is applied to these structures, in the right circumstances, these social roles can flip. This behavior caused by stressful environmental changes is one of the reasons Bertolt Brecht wrote The Spy. In The Spy, a character called “the man” is a school teacher for students in the Hitler youth. The students are taught in the Hitler youth certain behaviors, “They deliberately encourage the kids to repeat everything.” (Bertolt Brecht, 4) the encouragement of this behavior has caused the students to have a sort of power over not only their teachers, but their parents as well. The power which is given to those who did not have it originally causes the social structure to reverse, essentially giving students the authority. This shift causes the original authority to fear the students, and sensor their selves around them. This will in turn stop the students from learning how possibly detrimental those they are blindly following can be. Additionally, in The Spy, the man and his wife have a maid servant who is also the block warden’s daughter. This expresses a social shift as well, because the same censorship is needed around an employee as well. The man expresses a distaste for the need for censorship in his own home due to his employee saying, “Have we got to have a maid whose father is the block warden?” (Bertolt Brecht, 2) the man’s concerns coming from what the maidservant may overhear, and report it back to her father. The wife replies to this questioning with, “We’ve been over that again and again. The last thing you said was that it had its advantages.” (Bertolt Brecht, 2) referring to the fact that their employing the block warden’s daughter will put them on his
Orwell also reveals how peer pressure occurs and verifies its significance by stating how he was talked into shooting the elephant. Also, in Richler’s essay Jewish people are ruled by Hitler who is German race and he abused Jewish people.
One cannot be obedient to one’s power without being disobedient to another. In his article, “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” Erich Fromm argues people obey authority to feel safe. When one obeys, they become an ambiguous part of a whole, no longer accountable for actions or left on their own. In Ian Parker’s article, “Obedience,” analyzing Milgram's experiment, he claims people obey orders when there is no second option. According to Parker, if someone obeys an order, but there is no alternative, their accountability is lessoned. The two articles can speak to the tomfoolery that takes place in the motion picture, Mean Girls, which highlights a typical high school under the regime of the queen bee, Regina George, with her followers Gretchen Weiners and Karen Smith; the regime is usurped by a new girl, Cady Heron. Under the scope of Parker and Fromm, it can be argued that Gretchen was not disobeying Regina when she realigned with Cady, but actually remaining obedient to the social order of high school.
This itself alludes to America’s extreme response to communism during the Cold War era, under the influence of Senator Joe McCarthy. Similar to the paranoia that characterized the McCarthy era, Orwell’s dystopian society was expected to betray their friends, family and co-workers for the benefit of the state and themselves. This is made explicitly evident during Winston’s visit to the cafe, in which the telescreen sang; “Under the spreading chestnut tree/ I sold you and you sold me…”Foreshadowing Winston’s eventual betrayal of Maria in order to save himself, and his conformity to the party. Furthermore, the notion that “nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres in your skull” becomes ironic as the novel develops in which the criminalisation of unorthodox ideologies leads to the punishment of “thoughtcrime”, and the eventual “vaporisation” of dissidents. This itself alludes to the ‘great purges’ that took place under the terror that characterized Joseph Stalin’s reign. Likewise, the inherent fear of eccentricity amongst the oppressed citizens of “Airstrip one” is highlighted by the nature of “facecrime” in which the presence of an improper expression or any suggestion of abnormality could be punished. Thus, through Orwell 's effective use of allusion and characterisation, contextual audiences are provided with a didactic warning regarding the nature of a totalitarian reign, in which a “hideous ecstasy of fear” influences society’s
Susan Griffin's "Our Secret" is a study in psychology. It is a look into the human mind to see what makes people do the things they do and in particular what makes people commit acts of violence. She isolates the first half of the twentieth century and in particular the era of the Second World War as a basis for her study. The essay discusses a number of people but they all tie in to Heinrich Himmler. He is the extreme case, he who can be linked directly to every single death in the concentration camps. Griffin seeks to examine Himmler because if she can discern a monster like Himmler than everyone else simply falls into place. The essay also tries to deduce why something like the Holocaust, although never mentioned directly, can take place. How can so many people be involved and yet so few people try to end it.
Elie is a fourteen year old innocent and obedient boy dedicated to religious studies with a deep faith in God and total devotion to his father and his beautiful nurturing family. He lives a peaceful, meaningful live appropriate for his age. One day, his world turned upside down by cruel and surreal events. After the Nazis invade Hungary, they ship his family to the Auschwitz concentration camp. During that ordeal, the beasts separate him from his town, then from his mother and young sisters. In similar fashion, his Jewish community, composed of loving families, gets abandoned to the psychopathic designs of Adolf Hitler. When Elie arrives at Auschwitz’s gates, he describes the scary experience
Imagine that a group wants to ban Fahrenheit 451 because Montag defies authority. For the sake of the argument, assume for a moment that you wish to “ban” Fahrenheit 451 from the library shelves. To do so, you must do a number of things. First, you must establish why defying authority is wrong. What are its consequences? What are the probable effects on youth to see flagrant disregard of authority? (In regard to these questions, you may want to read Plato’s Apology to get a sense of how to argue the position.) Second, you must have some theory of psychology, either implied or directly stated. That is, you must establish how a reading of Fahrenheit 451 would inspire a student to flagrantly disregard authority. Why is reading bad for a student? How can it be bad? Next, you must establish how a student who reads Fahrenheit 451 will read the book and extract from it a message that says “Defy Authority Whenever Possible” and then act on this message.
When put into an authoritative position over others, is it possible to claim that with this new power individual(s) would be fair and ethical or could it be said that ones true colors would show? A group of researchers, headed by Stanford University psychologist Philip G. Zimbardo, designed and executed an unusual experiment that used a mock prison setting, with college students role-playing either as prisoners or guards to test the power of the social situation to determine psychological effects and behavior (1971). The experiment simulated a real life scenario of William Golding’s novel, “Lord of the Flies” showing a decay and failure of traditional rules and morals; distracting exactly how people should behave toward one another. This research, known more commonly now as the Stanford prison experiment, has become a classic demonstration of situational power to influence individualistic perspectives, ethics, and behavior. Later it is discovered that the results presented from the research became so extreme, instantaneous and unanticipated were the transformations of character in many of the subjects that this study, planned originally to last two-weeks, had to be discontinued by the sixth day. The results of this experiment were far more cataclysmic and startling than anyone involved could have imagined. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the discoveries from Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford prison experiment and of Burrhus Frederic “B.F.” Skinner’s study regarding the importance of environment.
Teachers are meant to teach the younger generation. It can be difficult to be able to control a classroom full of students. Although some teachers use the element of fear. In The Chocolate War Brother Leon uses fear. The students fear being mocked by Brother Leon. For example Brother Leon calls Gregory Bailey in front of the classroom. He states” Do you claim to be
You’re sitting alone in the café drinking your coffee and reading the newspaper. You see out of the corner of your eye a little girl sitting with her mom at the table nearby. You keep glancing over and you notice the little girl is staring you down. No matter what you do she continues to watch your every move. You wonder how long she has been sitting there and why she is gazing at you. You are being watched just like the people Michel Foucault describes, people who are simply being under constant surveillance. Foucault's work, "Panopticism," features a central control tower from which all inhabitants are watched while in their surrounding glass-walled cells. The Panopticon creates an atmosphere in which the inhabitants never know whether or not they are being watched forcing them to assume that they are at all times. With this mindset, "the exercise of power may be supervised by society as a whole" (Foucault). In other words, the people control their actions and take care of themselves appropriately just on the fact that they think they are being watched. "In appearance, [panopticism] is merely the solution of a technical problem; but, through it, a whole type of society emerges" (Foucault). The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton portrays a society that functions much like the Panopticon. Newland Archer and his fellow New Yorkers are part of a very close knit group of people. Everyone knows what everyone else's business and the gossip that surrounds them, which makes privacy a foreign concept. The only way to be accepted is to know the right people, have the right connections and, of course, have money. Once a part of the group, everyone must follow a set of unwritten rules. The society forces everyone to act a certain way, and ev...
The author of Escape from Camp 14 and the Allegory of the Cave are trying to show how isolation and manipulation of the individual’s environment can affect their mental and physical state. Imprisonment can cause an individual to perceive and respond differently from the norm when trying to survive and to learn how to succeed in their environment. Their confinement and fear of the unknown have caused them to become afraid and given control to their manipulator. Unfortunately,these individuals have been in their control environments since birth so are not able to see or have knowledge of anything else besides what they are taught. For instance, in Camp 14 the government has placed rules to control the prisoners within its walls by implementing
Surveillance used negatively in the public eye creates fear in the public eye, which controls people opportunity and limits their interactions with others. In Gilman's novel, Herland, the developing trepidation in the brains of people is an aftereffect of reconnaissance. Actually, the Colonel's objective in utilizing reconnaissance is precisely this as it diminishes ones capacity to live openly and have privacy. While Terry, Jeff and Vandyck investigate Herland further, they understand something in the trees that has been watching them the whole time, Vandyck the storyteller explains, “We rushed close in and looked up. There among the boughs overhead was something – more than one something – that clung motionless, close to the great trunk”
They say people are happier when they give into a groups values. While this may be true in some instances, most times conformity leads to people's views being repressed. Conformity makes the worst of a group come out. In Monsters Due on Maple Street, there was a bad situation with all the power going out. The “mob” of the neighborhood was looking for someone to blame. They came together and things got violent. The men of the mob went over to the new neighbors house. When they came back one of the women said, “You killed him, Charlie. You shot him dead”(Monsters, act 2). The “mob mentality” got to his head. Charlie thought the new neighbor was to blame for the power outage. This shows how people conforming to a group without knowing what they are getting into can influence thinking. The thinking of the individuals was tainted by being in a group, demonstrating the effects of
Imagine living in a world where you could never feel safe. Every step you took, every move you made, every word you spoke, terrified you. It could either save you, or threaten your life. Imagine going from living a normal, everyday life to living in terror and fear, then waking up and trying to forget it all. That’s how thirteen year old, Albert Beder felt during the times of the Holocaust.
Humans’ need to fit in is shown through the experience of a high school girl, Eve Shalen, who reflected on her susceptibility to being influenced by her peers’ actions. Although Shalen was bullied herself, she did not hesitate to make fun of another girl when with the group of “popular” girls. Her need to belong caused her to act out against her morals. A similar situation arose in Germany when a young boy had to decide whether or not he was going to throw stones at Jewish shops along with the other children. There was pressure from his peers to participate, but after contemplating his options he decided against it. However, in Reserve Police Battalion 101, the men were easily influenced by each other’s decisions. When Trapp made the offer that any man who felt unable to openingly shoot Jews was permitted to step out, only a couple men opted out. One later admitted that he did not want to be seen as cowardly among his fellow soldiers, therefore he participated in the shooting. These men let the fear of not being accepted by their comrades take priority over the lives of hundreds of Jews. German citizens refrained from thinking as individuals and enabled the actions of their peers to influence their personal behavior.
Many human beings have been involved in a power struggle of some sort since the beginning of time. Between power in the business world, classroom, and government it is often clear who is subordinate and who is dominant. Subordinates may at times feel powerless; however, they can gain satisfaction out of aesthetics and hidden transcripts because of the personal freedoms it represents to them.