Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Understanding the role of social work
The role of social workers
The role of social workers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Understanding the role of social work
Everyone must surely have once experienced to be a worker in each person’s life. Worker can be defined as an individual who engaged oneself in a contract of service to perform specified works or tasks for an employer in an organization. According to Watson (2008), work is task-based activities that enable people to survive in the context of social and economic. Financial success in term of salary or wage is one of the driving forces which motivates worker to commit themselves in work. The traditional view of financial success literally depends on an individual worker to excel in his or her given job but with the requisite qualification and years of experience in that particular work there is every chance one is able to harness the material reward. There is no restriction for anyone to pursue a financial success if one has the endurance, capability and will to excel.
Weber, a notable German sociologist, proposes a management system of bureaucracy where the organizations are formalized and having rigid structure. A bureaucratic organization is said to have a well-defined formal hierarchical structure in such a way that individuals who are in higher position will assign jobs to bottom tier
…show more content…
He further sees the social life if labour depends on the religious belief, practice, norm, cults and beliefs. An additional illustration of Durkheim’s functional approach is his discussion of criminality. According to Durkheim, mechanical solidarity is mostly noticeable in the primitive societies comprising of primitive method of work such as hunter and shepherd (Durkheim, 1933). He calls this as solidarity mechanical on the reasons of repetition of same work and totally controlled by the chief. The society tends to repeat the same roles which are easily recognizable between the individuals (Durkheim, 1933). Moreover, this does not seem to change over
By using a combination of both qualitative and quantitative methods Sainsbury identified several Social Factors and emphasized the effect of Social Integration. Therefore, although dated by todays standards Durkheim's ideas still hold relevance and significance in todays society, but still, in order to use Durkheim's ideas effectively then the problems in his theories must be solved as Sainsbury attempted to do.
Durkheim was concerned with what maintained the cohesion of social structures. He was a functionalist, he believed each aspect of society contributes to society 's stability and functioning as a whole. He theorised that society stayed united for two reasons “mechanical solidarity” and “organic solidarity.” Premodern societies were held together by mechanical solidarity, a type of social order maintained through a minimal division of labour and a common collective consciousness. Such societies permitted a low degree of individual autonomy, Social life was fixed and there was no sense of self. They had retributive legal systems so no individual action or deviance from the common conscience was tolerated. In industrialised modern societies Durkheim says Mechanical solidarity is replaced with organic solidarity. In organic solidarity capitalist societies their is a high division of labour which requires the specialisation of jobs people do, this allows for individual autonomy
Durkheim was desperate to understand what kept the world together and how people socialize within this realm. Durkheim expressed that social facts, “consist of manners of acting, thinking and feeling external to the individual, which are invested with a coercive power by virtue of which they exercise control over him” (pg. 205). These social facts work as a set of beliefs, values, or practices that work to constrain individuals. However, the division of labor keeps those values in check. Similar to a moral rule. For Durkheim, the division of labor was no just economic. The division of labor is detailed in every aspect of life as it is universally
Max Weber’s theory of bureaucracy lends itself to the notion of the managerialism. He claims that as society becomes more integrated and complex, organizational elites come to be more dependent on specialists and experts, or bureaucracies to advise and influence them on decisions. Bureaucracies are groups of individuals doing specialized tasks which blend into a cohesive and efficient unit. Power becomes increasingly centralized within bureaucracies and the elites who control them because as they grow, becoming more powerful, they use that power to gain more control over the masses. Weber saw the historical development of societies as a movement toward rational forms of organization, that is, groups organized not on the basis of the authority of personalities and traditions but on the basis of specific functions to perform or objectives to meet (Marger p. 72). Weber often used the notion of a machine to illustrate what he meant by modern organizations, referring to people as “cogs'; that serve the machine, losing their identity and creativity in the process. Although Weber admitted that both mechanization and bureaucracy together created an extremely efficient and productive economic system, they also worked to bui...
In order to broaden my perspective on health care, I decided not to interview an occupational therapist. I wanted to hear the health perspective of another professional, therefore I chose to interview a social worker. I believed it would be interesting since social work is one of the disciplines that influenced occupational therapy. Claire Fultz was able to give me a glimpse of the social work profession and corresponding background during our interview. Fultz is a psychiatric social worker employed at Mindoula Health Inc. who began working in the human services and social work field back in 2001. Prior to her professional work experience, she completed two Master’s programs while majoring in four specializations. She explained how her experience
Throughout the Social Work Program at Winona State University-Rochester, I have been able to expand my knowledge about what it means to be a social worker. Prior to joining this program, when I thought of a social worker, I thought of someone who is highly motivated, compassionate, supportive, and someone who wants to make a difference in somebody’s life. Although this definition is true, overtime I have been able to expand this definition. Now, they are also someone who builds relationships with clients during what are often their lowest points in their lives and they are a person who often will put others needs before their own. Social workers use their knowledge about maintaining a person’s dignity and worth and rely on skills that help them understand people within their environment, and using their training to help people from all walks of life both on the micro level and the macro level.
Social Workers are very important to everyday life. They are the ones that help people in need when they have nobody else to turn too. Also, they provide resources and better understanding of predicaments that you could be experiencing. I will reflect on how the class has affected me, my own experiences and how some theories have connected to my life experiences, and lastly, if the class helped toward my major. This class is important for someone that wants to become a social worker and wants to learn about the different theories used. Also, learning about me during this process of completing this class is fun and a way to see if the social work profession is right for me. There was many theories explained throughout this class but many will not be said because it wasn’t the main points that I was trying to get across. There are two tools that are used that can help a social worker organize a client’s life: Bubble map and Briefcase exercise. There are so many different ways a social worker can help a client deal with their problems and come up with a solution. It is up to that social worker to identify the client’s problem and see what theory fits.
Accordingly, Durkheim theorized about two different types of societies, based upon two different types of solidarity. . The first being a “Mechanical Solidarity” (Palumbo et al, 2005) a society based upon collective consciousness, sharing common beliefs, norms and values. Within Mechanical Solidarity, referred to as “traditional” and “small scale” (Sociology Index) individuals experienced a solidarity based upon a strong sense of belonging to their community,
Theory is defined as “…”. In the social work profession, it is not enough to just understand the definition of theory, but rather be able to integrate theory into practice when working to plan interventions at multiple practice levels. This integration of theory into the social work practice is an emphasis of the profession as noted in the profession’s core competencies. Core competency 2.1.6 “engage in research-informed practice and practice-informed research” (NASW code of ethics) is the basis for theory integration within the social work profession. The profession’s practice behaviors state that social workers must “use research evidence to inform practice” (NASW code of ethics). In other words, social workers should “attend to findings
Organizations in today’s world need to adapt and overcome many obstacles that are predictable as well as unpredictable. Max Weber outlines the five basic principles of bureaucracy which are as follows: The Division of Labor, Hierarchy of Authority, Written Rules and Regulations, Impersonality Principal, and Technical Qualifications. These basic principals were designed to maximize productivity and assert authority over subordinates in the workforce. (Weber, 1968) In present day the basic principles of Weber’s bureaucratic design are still visible in just about every organization. The only variable is to what extent they are applied.
Durkheim focus on social explanations rather than individual explanation for things. He looked at economic inequality. Durkheim came up with social facts which was norms, cultures and values. Durkheim believe social facts affect one another and affect people. Durkheim believed that Social facts couldn’t be understood. Durkheim believe in social explanations. Durkheim used two metaphors to describe the different bases of solidarity, or social order, in pre-modern society and modern society. He saw pre modern society as mechanical solidarity and he saw modern society as organic solidarity. Pre modern society would be that everyone is the same and do the same thing and they all have same values. Modern society there are different people each
Ultimately Durkheim was a strong believer that it is society that defines the individual rather than the individual shaping society. For this reason we can clearly see why Durkheim was highly concerned with growing individualism in society, within a society which he believes shapes an individual therefore individuals are highly dependent on society. This can be seen in Durkheim’s theory of the division of labour. Durkheim argues that in a primitive society which is a society which is seen as having more morals and was a much better society to live in this is because society is seen as having deteriorated as civilisation has developed and become modernised. The division of labour within a primitive society therefore is to create or maintain a mechanical social solidarity in which there is a common consensus which allows social order to be maintai...
Similarly in Weber’s bureaucratic approach, organizations are divided into different echelons with each varying in its degrees of influence. Each unit being commanded by the one above it, a system that promotes stability and has a predictable line of communication. Both approaches of management rely heavily on regulated control. Whether governing task scientifically of people authoritatively. A solid form of control is mus...
‘Weber emphasized on top-down control in the form of monocratic hierarchy that is a system of control in which policy is set at the top and carried out through a series of offices, whereby every manager and employee are to report to one person in top management and held accountable by that manager’ (Pfiffner, 2004, p. 1).
Bureaucracy is an organizational design based on the concept of standardization. “It is characterized by highly routine operating tasks achieved through specialization, very formalized rules and regulations, tasks that are grouped into functional departments, centralized authority, narrow spans of control, and decision making that follows the chain of command” (Judge & Robbins, 2007, p.