RTT Coursework Welcome all, I am here today to talk to you all about an issue that has taken the community by storm. My reason for writing this speech is because, I think smacking towards children should be illegal. Firstly, I believe that the smacking of children is out of order and should never be used as an act of punishment. They might be infuriating and naughty but smacking them shows abusive nature. Some people use this as a form of punishment as they don’t know any better as this was how they was bought up by their parents. They say “it didn’t do me any harm”, and those people would say that we are blowing this matter out of proportion. However, every week one child dies, one child, that is over fifty a year and millions more being …show more content…
Well is it not offensive for the government to tell us to our faces we can beat our children to death without the law taking action? Think about it: do the government really care for the future generation of adults lives? Of course not if they are allowing something like this to destroy our community and the future lives of our own flesh and blood. Another reason for my belief is when I was a child myself I had a brother called Taylor and he misbehaved quite a bit and didn’t react to having things taken away from him, so my parents resorted to smacking him. After about a couple weeks of him having bruises and red marks he felt that his parents didn’t love him one bit and decided to…….. Well you can guess what happened to him, because this is why I have overcome my fear of talking publicly to bring you to terms with my own life to make you see this side of smacking that no one should ever experience but, unfortunately I cannot forget that
“In the same society who hold different moral or religious convictions may disagree about what type of behavior toward a child amounts to abuse.” (Gale, 2014). Slapping a child when they act up is a form discipline to some individuals. To a certain extent it would be considered abuse. As a parent, they do not want you to tell them how to handle their child simply because that is their child. Every day there is a child out there being abused and will not speak up. Some children think that if they do decide to try and get help, people would not believe them. Also being abused and letting someone know maybe embarrassing. In the article “Child Abuse.” Opposing Viewpoint Online Collection, it goes on to say, “Even people who are reasonably confident that they have witnessed child abuse may be reluctant to report it. Some may not want to become involved in what they consider a private family matter. Others may believe that reporting the problem will do no good.” People just turn a blind eye to things that do not involve them. They feel like it is not their business. Individuals that know the abuser could also be frightened themselves. CHARLES
Smacking has become a controversial debate in today’s society as a group of doctors tried to make a smacking of children illegal (Browne 2013). Similarly, smacking caused numerous deaths of children (Browne 2013). Smacking is a physical punishment which was a typical way that parents used to guide their children in past. Moreover, they believe that smacking is more effective and it is acceptable. Physical punishment is illegal in 33 countries, whereas in some states and territories physical punishment by parents is legal as long as it is “reasonable” such as Australia, United State, Britain and Canada (Why smacking should be regarded as a crime 2013). There are several reasons that smacking should be illegal in Australia. Physical punishment leads to aggressive and antisocial behaviour. Furthermore, Australian children have right of protection from violation. Finally, smacking children may lead to death.
Spanking, a fictitious form of child abuse, is an appropriate action toward unruly children. It is a popular practice used to instill discipline and values in children, and is more effective than talking to or yelling at the child or placing the child in “time out” sessions. In the long run, spanking causes no damage to the child’s mental or physical health. Instead, it creates a basis for good behavior.
Social tolerance of spanking has been the norm for thousands of years. The most widely accepted source coming from the bible. He who spares the rod hates the son, but he who loves him is careful to discipline (New International Version, Proverbs 13:24). Religion and culture have been a very common excuse for the spanking of children world-wide. “Hitting children is intertwined with religious beliefs, cultural views, and social policy… (Kazden & Benjet). However, the world has changed and evolved into a much more civilized society. In this country alo...
Beating children, chronically belittling them, using them for sexual gratification, or depriving them of the basic necessities of life are acts that cannot be permitted in a civilized society. Tolerating child abuse denies the worth of children as human beings. Each of us has a moral obligation to turn in a child abuser.
Violence is a means of oppressing the weak and robbing them off their will. This could be done verbally or physically, although the former isn’t considered as severe as the latter which has its more hurtful and negative impression. However, when it comes to children being the ones exposed to violence, it becomes an issue of concern.
A parent’s right to spank their child has been an issue of great debate for a long time. On one side of the debate are people who feel that to strike a child in any way automatically constitutes abuse. The opposing side believes that parents are within their legal and, more importantly, their moral rights to discipline their child as they see fit. As one can imagine, the former are routinely portrayed to be overly humanistic and ultra-liberal, while the latter are almost always smeared as right-wing bible thumpers and uneducated miscreants.
According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “child abuse” is defined as “mistreatment of a child by a parent or guardian, including neglect, beating, and sexual molestation”(Webster). “Physical abuse involves physical harm or injury to the child. It may be the result of a deliberate attempt to hurt the child, but not always. It can also result from severe discipline, such as using a belt on a child, or physical punishment that is inappropriate to the child’s age or physical condition” (Child Welfare Information Gateway).However, parents look to justify their actions through the bible by saying “spare the rod spoil the child”. “But there is a big difference between using physical punishment to discipline and physical abuse. The point of disciplining children is to teach them right from wrong, not to make them live in fear” (Child Welfare Information Gateway).
First of all, spanking does not lead to violence. Our surrounding world and media do. "The average sixteen-year- old has watched 18,000 murders during his formative years, including a daily bombardment of stabbings, shootings, hangings, decapitations, and general dismemberment" (Meier 34). It seems unjust to blame parents who are trying to raise their children properly for today's violence. If a child touches a hot stove he does not become a more violent person because of it, he just learns not to do it again because he learned a valuable lesson from the pain (Meier 34).
Child abuse is an issue within society that effects the lives of not only the victims but also the lives of many people in the social order. Child abuse is any mistreatment or neglect of a child that results in non-accidental injury or harm and which cannot be logically explained. There are several forms of abuse and neglect and many state governments have developed their own legal description of what constitutes child maltreatment for the purposes of removing a child and prosecuting a criminal charge. Child abuse consists of different forms of harm including physical, emotional, sexual, and neglect.
In this essay, smacking is defined as spanking a child with the purpose to either discipline or punish. Professor Murray characterizes beating as the utilization of physical power with the expectation of making a child encounter torment yet not causing them to get injured, with the end goal of controlling their child’s attitude. The most frequent physical punishment which is categorized as sensible include the age of the child and the form of punishment. The negative impacts on smacking a child can be seen as research shows it reduces cognitive ability by lowering the IQ. However, there is an argument which states that there is a positive relationship between harsh discipline and how a child deals with problems in later life. This may be true in some cases but smacking may create kids to have bad mental health such as low self-esteem. Consequently, smacking children should be made illegal.
The physical abuse of children covers a wide range of actions from what some might term ‘justifiable chastisement’ such as slapping or spanning to the sort of actions which most would agree constitute deliberate, sadistic cruelty against children.
“Children believe this is how all families operate so they think violence is okay,” said Peterson. “It use to be little girls would become victims and little boy would become abusers. Now we are seeing both boys and girls becoming abusers because they are understanding who has the power.”
The story opens at a school in which one of the authors gave a presentation on the question of missing children. Upon closing, a parent approached the speaker expressing deep concern over the complexities of the world and her children having to grow up in it. The past twenty years or so have ushered a growing concern among public and professional persons regarding the safety and welfare of children. Physical force against children is a wide- ranging complicated view.
By prohibiting corporal chastisement at home as a form of disciplinary punishment, South Africa will adhere to its international legal obligation. Parents will no longer be allowed to inflict physical harm to their children as a form of disciplinary punishment. Thus the rights of children, as previously mentioned, will no longer be infringed.