In the book of Slow Violence and the environmentalism of the poor, Rob Nixon makes the conceptual framework called slow violence. This book emphasizes the relationship between slow violence and the activists of environmental justice in the whole society. What’s the “slow violence”? From author’s definition, the term means “a violence that occurs gradually and out of sight, a violence of delayed destruction that is dispersed across time and space, an attritional violence that is typically not viewed as violence at all (2).” In other words, “slow violence” is a summary term for the all unseen violence. People may not see slow violence in their life, but the power of slow violence spread anywhere. Climate change, toxic draft, light and air pollution, …show more content…
In the background of globalized world, countries of neoliberalism or capitalism as the domination role controls the whole society. During the background, people live in the fast-paced society and hardly considers the slow violence. The prohibitive cost of education and house, low social security, high unemployment rate, and some other problems make people hard to focus on others. There is the problem in the field. As the environmental aspect, globalization makes the inequality among countries. When company starts to enhance themselves, employers will find lots of cheap labors and resources from the developing countries. Some international company puts their industrial factories and product line to China, India these developing countries. During the process, the developing countries solve the problem of employment and companies save the cost of labor and natural sources. However, for the environment of developing countries, there is a disaster. When developing countries continue to receive the factories of international companies, the slow violence corrodes the environment of developing countries (28). Even though the employment will increase at this period, the environment would receive the irreversible terrible change. Nixon thinks this influence is from structural slow violence
Our global world is becoming more connected as we become integrated politically, socially and even economically. Due to the Bretton Woods agreement, different countries have been economically dependent on each other in fear of war to erupt. From then on, different organizations and policies tied more countries into being economic globalized. This economic globalization has then given us many opportunities in trade and more access to natural resources in other countries. Unfortunately, there are some negative effects that are brought to less developed countries.
Nicholas Kristof’s article “For Environmental Balance, Pick up a Rifle,” which appeared in The New York Times, attempts to convince the American people that deer pose a danger to humans by taking more lives each year than any other American mammal. He states that deer populations, unchecked by predators, are increasing in a way that is unnatural and are destroying the ecosystem in many parts of the country. The suggestion he makes to his readers is that we must kill deer to bring the population down in order to prevent so many human deaths. Kristof appears to advocate hunting without much concern for other alternatives. While he does include statistical data to strengthen his point, other types of support he provides could be considered irrelevant or biased.
One way that globalization limits sustainable prosperity is the amount of environmental destruction that occurs in our growing world. For example, a process called shipwrecking is the deconstruction of ships that are no longer able to function properly. The ships are pulled up onto beaches in Bangladesh and are taken apart by workers with blow torches. The ships tend to rust leaving the beaches a reddish orange color. This rust can get into the ocean affecting many other parts of our world. Also, gasses that are produced and released into the environment from the blowtorches help contribute to the already occurring global warming. Another scary fact is that there is nearly one death per day in ship breaking yards, and nearly one quarter of them get some form of cancer due to the harsh chemicals. Ship breaking is a very dangerous job and puts many lives at risk. A big factor that helps wreck the environment is the large manufacturing plants that are located in many different countri...
One striking fact of violent and nonviolent campaigns is that the frequency of both has grown throughout the years. Both had been steadily increasing since the 1900s and both had a sharp decline after 2006. However, the frequency of violent campaig...
Racism is commonly thought of as an act that is synonymous with violence; however, one common form of racism, environmental racism, often takes place without people being aware the events are happening before detrimental activities have been put into action. In Melissa Checker’s book Polluted Promises, she relates that Reverend Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis Jr. coined the term environmental racism while stating that there is “deliberate targeting of communities of color for toxic waste disposal and the siting of polluting industries” (Checker 14). This problem is important to discuss, as many groups of people around the United States continue to be impacted by these events every day. Such people include
Globalization, a fundamentally constructive revolution, is the catalyst driving the current situation. On the international level, globalization creates jobs, promotes trade, and encourages cooperation between countries. The interconnected nature of national economies creates a net that not only helps sustain troubled economies, but actually discourages international hostilities by introducing an additional layer of reciprocity. Through globalizat...
Due to the phenomenon of globalization, a substantial part of manufacturing has been moved overseas and goods are constantly being shipped all over the world. These processes are contributing to the advancement of international trade and economic improvement of many lesser developed countries. Unfortunately, globalization has also led to a significant growth of worldwide inequality. While the Western world has largely benefited from the changes, many countries in the developing world are facing great troubles adjusting to the new reality of global interconnectedness. Economic constrictions, unemployment, the weakening of government, corruption, and military conflicts are pushing people to leave their homes and seek better lives elsewhere.
For economists, politicians, military strategists and even the simple citizens this is a rare chance to see the rise of a superpower and to experience in real time all the effects of such global developments. The main catalyst for the rise of new powers, especially China, is the globalization process which began two decades ago by Western powers; and as we all know there are advantages and disadvantages of the globalization. Thus, reality forces us to think more and more in a comprehensive manner and to analyze the effects of globalization, especially for positioning each country and especially in defining future development policies.
These results change or modify political organizations to be suitable for the needs of global capital. Regions and nations are encouraged to import and export of goods from other parts of the world rather than supplying or manufacturing them in their own homeland. Thus, seeking expensive manufactured supplies or goods from third world countries to import them to the first world corporation’s injunction with the free trade zones of globalization (Ravelli and Webber, 2015). These negotiations raises new organizations, for example, the World Trade Organization (WTO) to aid and supervise both countries to for a legalized trade. However, Neoliberalism amplifies the negative aspects of globalization’s effect on the economy. For example, deregulation, decrease of government benefits, and tax modifications (Bunjun, 2014). Nevertheless, relating these negative aspects to the documentary Made in L.A. (Carracedo, 2007) which is the main issue of increased risk of employment for both the first world and third world countries. In regards to, a switch from full time stable and secure jobs to part time unstable and insecure jobs. This reduces career growth for many employees, which they recognize, and thus switch jobs – where as they may not fit as well (Bunjun, 2014). As a result, globalization causes market inefficiency via labor market segregation and exploitation, unemployment and underemployment, unequal access to employment (Bunjun,
Shangquan, Gao. “Economic Globalization: Trends, Risks, and Risk Prevention.” Development. United Nations, 2001. Web. 10 Dec. 2013. .
Globalization, the acceleration and strengthening of worldwide interactions among people, companies and governments, has taken a huge toll on the world, both culturally and economically. It’s generating a fast-paced, increasingly tied world and also praising individualism. It has been a massive subject of matter amongst scientists, politicians, government bureaucrats and the normal, average human population. Globalization promoted the independence of nations and people, relying on organizations such as the World Bank and also regional organizations such as the BRICs that encourage “a world free of poverty” (World Bank). Despite the fact that critics can argue that globalization is an overall positive trend, globalization has had a rather negative cultural and economic effect such as the gigantic wealth gaps and the widespread of American culture, “Americanization”; globalization had good intentions but bad results.
Globalization results in several grievous consequences in developing countries. First of all, As Buckley has written (1998), tourism causes the traditional culture hard to live and ultimately lost their identities. For instance, Prague, which is the most popular tourist attraction in Czech Republic, witnesses the city has reversed from the old age of communism to commercialism nowadays which is of more American value. In addition, Buckley also declared (1998) that global business activity can also cause negative effects on developing countries in different aspects. Environmentally, more and more factories invested by foreign corporations have already resulted in air pollution and deterioration of ecological environment in some areas in China. Economically, global business activity causes a result that the gap between rich and poor countries is widened rapidly, because power and wealth are gradually concentrated in rich countries through global trade (Buckley, 1998).
Just imagine waking up in squalor, a once prominent society, now a desolate wasteland. All because foreign interest has raped your land of its natural resources and you seen not a cent in profit. Although, globalization is unifying the worlds developed nations and is bringing commerce to nations that have struggle in past years. True, globalization has many positive effects but do the pros outweigh the cons. In this essay I will discuss Globalization ruining the integrity of many countries and also is forcing many undeveloped nations into a bind, and is causing economic distress on some developed nations. Also, due to economic globalization the nations of the world are diluting their culture, sovereignty, natural resources, safety and political system. My goal is not to change your way of thought, but only to enlighten you of the negatives of global economic expansion.
Globalization, love it or hate it, but you can’t escape it. Globalization may be regarded as beneficial from an economic and business point of view, but however cannot be perceived the ditto when examined from the social sciences and humanities side of it. Globalization can be argued as a tool for economic growth, advancement and prosperity through co-operation between the developed and developing countries. The pro-globalization critics argue that the benefits that globalization brings to developing nations surpasses or outcasts the negative impacts caused by globalization and may even go a step further to state that it is the only source of hope for developing nations to prosper and stand out. However, the real question to be asked is as to what extent are the positives argued upon without taking into account the negative aspects of globalization towards developing countries. Moreover, how many developing countries out of many are exactly benefiting or even prospering from globalization is another question to consider. Therefore, my paper will dispute that indeed growth and advancement provided by globalization to developing countries is beneficial in short-term, but in the long-run, it will only bring upon negative impacts and challenges due to the obstacles involved such as exploitation of labour and resources, higher increase in poverty, and effects of multi-national corporations on local businesses and the economy, and to an extent the effects on the developing country itself.
Because of the afore mentioned, apparent social and economic benefits of Globalization there are forces which simultaneously ask for both the protection of...