Slobodan Dan Paich: An Analysis

607 Words2 Pages

Tangible can be defined as physically touching a substance, whilst, intangible has no physical presence. Slobodan Dan Paich expresses “both the cultural similarities and diversity of sources in Mediterranean history” (Dan Paich, 2010) as well as connecting the minds of people from Brazil to those in North America. He does this by speaking of French anthropologist Claude Levi – Strauss. The paper as well looks at the methodology of Art History through Aby Warburg, Fritz Saxl, and Erwin Panofsky. Claude Levi – Strauss “challenges the view of the centrality of western civilization through systematic observation and contact with indigenous people of Brazil and North America (Tropiques, 1955). He compares both the indigenous mind with the ‘Sapiens

Open Document