Slavery In Latin America

1651 Words4 Pages

Slavery In Latin America

Slavery in the Americas was quite diverse. Mining operations in the tropics experienced

different needs and suffered different challenges than did plantations in more temperate areas of

Norther Brazil or costal city’s serving as ports for the exporting of commodities produced on the

backs of the enslaved peoples from the African continent. This essay will look at these different

situations and explore the factors that determined the treatment of slaves, the consequences of

that treatment, and the conditions that lead to resistance by the slaves working in their various

capacities.

After the initial conquest of Mexico and South America it was time to develop the

economy and export the resources that would benefit the monarchy back home in Spain and

Portugal. Silver and Gold were two such commodities. Silver mines in Northern Mexico were

supervised by blacks who directed the Indians in the arduous task of extracting the precious

metal. Gold in Central Mexico was also mined by blacks. The Gold mining regions were hot,

tropical, isolated areas of the jungle. The regions were sparsely populated and it was difficult to

keep the locals as a work force. The introduction of disease in the tropics made these areas

death zones to the indigenous people as they had no resistance to the virulent plagues. There was

a need to get cheap or free labor that would be capable of resisting the disease and who would be

easier to dominate than the locals who could run off and establish themselves elsewhere

relatively easily. The natural answer was to obtain slaves from the African continent. The slave

trade was already in operation on the African continent. Coastal cities there often enslaved

inland peoples so it was not difficult to obtain the stock and export them to the Americas.

Slaves in the mining regions were subject to harsh, isolated conditions. There were few

females and little or no community amongst the slaves. Some of the workers did have access to

money and as a result could negotiate there freedom for a price. In 1732 1/3 of the African

population of Choco was free as a result. Less fortunate slaves who found the conditions

unbearable fled to even more isolated areas of the back country to survive on their own or in

small colonies.

The Sugar plantations of Northern Brazil were a major c...

... middle of paper ...

...so manumission possibilities increased.

Slaves isolated from family life and culture working in miserable conditions were often flight

risks as they had no real options and the terrain lent to good hiding. There were also no whites

around to hire as cheap labor to search them out and return them. Mulatto and Criollo slaves

were higher on the socioeconomic ladder than the Bozal and were therefore less likely to resist

as they were a step away from freedom which meant they would not consider fleeing as good an

option as remaining in the social circle and family they had established.

Slavery under any conditions is not the optimum existence for human beings. It is a fact

that human nature seeks to dominate. Greed and money are often at the root of such efforts. The

Israelites, the Irish, the Africans, and enumerable other groups have heritage that includes a

period of slavery or of enslaving or both. African Cimarron communities even enslaved other

African fleeing the plantations. It is not rooted in race as much as it is rooted in human nature.

The preceding essay is just a synopsis of how it functioned for African’s in certain regions

during a space in history.

More about Slavery In Latin America

Open Document