Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How child abuse effects mental health
How child abuse effects mental health
How child abuse effects mental health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How child abuse effects mental health
In abusive relationships, women are at a much higher risk of being the victim then men (Mata-Pariente, Plazoala-Castano, & Ruiz-Perez 2006). A large number of women leave and return to their abusive relationships numerous times before they come to a realization of the victimization and break away (Cavanaugh, Gelles, & Loseke 2014). During the time of abuse, women may suffer psychological or physical consequences to their health. Many studies have shown that a majority of women who have been abused showed signs of anxiety, low self-esteem, and depression (Estrellado & Loh 2014). Although remaining in abusive relationships can affect the victims in a negative way, many women choose to stay because of several reasons. According to Mata-Pariente, …show more content…
Plazoala-Castano, & Ruiz-Perez (2006), women stay in abusive relationships for six reasons: 1) they believe that the abuser will eventually change, 2) they are financially dependent on the abuser, 3) they fear the lost of their children, 4) they lack support from friends, family, and the community, 5) they are emotionally dependent on the abuser, and finally, 6) they are intimidated by their abusive partner and is scared of retaliating.
These six reasons why women stay in abusive relationships can be explained using the three theoretical perspectives - the psychological perspective, the sociological perspective, and the feminist perspective. The psychological perspective accounts for two of the six reasons.
The psychological perspective has previously been used to explain why some women stay in unhealthy relationships. Out of the three perspectives, the psychological perspective focuses more on creating an explanation for the behavior of the abuser. According to Cavanaugh, Gelles, & Loseke (2014), the psychological perspective is is created around the idea that the batterers are behaving in abusive ways due to a psychological problem. A very common disorder that many abusers develop are personality disorders. They are usually developed at a young age due to exposure to violence and neglect in the home. The personality disorders that they develop
…show more content…
can cause them to become one of three types of batterers. The three types of batterers that they can become are - family-only batterers, borderline-dysphoric batters, and generally violent-antisocial batterers (Dutton & Bodnarchuck ______ ). The batterers can have more than one victim that they are inflicting the abusive behavior upon, it is just that their significant other and kids may be more accessible than others. Knowing the fact that many abusers have a personality disorder, women may want to stay in their abusive relationship believing that they abuser can change (Cavanaugh, Gelles, & Loseke 2014). Personality disorders are illnesses in the brain and just like any other illness, they may be cured. The victims may believe that the disorder is what’s causing their partner to be abusive and it is not under their control. To these women, the psychological perspective justifies why batterers acts the way they do and provides an explanation to the victims. These victims believe that their partner can become “normal” again which provokes them to bear the abuse and stay. Women also stay in abusive relationships because of their emotional dependence to their partner (Mata-Pariente, Plazoala-Castano, & Ruiz-Perez 2006). Many people believe that women may need men in their life in order to live, despite the abuse that may happen to them. Without having their partner there to be emotionally dependent on, their psychological state can become unstable. Living without their significant other may be doing a disservice to them than actually doing any good. Besides focusing on the individual for the reasons why women stay in abusive relationships, society also contributes a significant amount. The sociological perspective can help explain two of the six reasons why women choose to stay in abusive relationships. The sociological perspective is geared towards looking at certain situations through a sociological lens. It focuses on the social environment that surround these women which explains their decision to stay in their abusive relationships (Cavanaugh, Gelles, & Loseke 2014). From a sociological framework, one of the reasons why women decide to stay is due to their financial dependence on the abuser. Financial dependence is one of the main reasons why women tend to stay. Women who depend on their spouse financially may feel more burdened and trapped if they do decide to leave (Lacey 2010). This is the case because they believe they lack the resources and skills to live well on their own apart from the abuser. These women are typically unemployed meaning they have little to no income. They may believe they lack the skills necessary to enter the workforce. Not only that, many do not have much education which can handicap them from opportunities that can help them become financially stable. Because of this fear of being financially unstable on their own, they remain with the abuser for financial support. Another reason why women refuses to leave abusive relationships, looking at it from a sociological perspective, is that they lack the support from friends and family to make the transition happen. How her friends and family reacts to her situation is a big determining factor in how she chooses to handle the situation (Mata-Pariente, Plazoala-Castano, & Ruiz-Perez 2006). If they encouraged her to leave and assures her that they will help support her, she may be more willingly to go. According to Mata-Pariente, Plazoala-Castano, & Ruiz-Perez (2006), many cultures view it as socially unacceptable for a women to stay single or unmarried. This places the burden and blame on the women victim. They may fear social rejection from their family and friends and for this reason, they inevitably choose to stay. There are also reasons from the feminist perspective that explains why women decide to stay. Out of the six reasons why women stay with their abusive partners, the last two can be explained using the feminist perspective.
Similar to the sociological perspective, the feminist perspective also justify their reasoning through social factors that these women have to face (Cavanaugh, Gelles, & Loseke 2014). What distinguishes the feminist perspective apart from the sociological perspective is that the feminist framework only focuses on social constructs that are attributed to gender inequality or the gendered nature of society. In society, men are usually seen as superior to women. This may explain why women choose to stay because of the fear of retaliation. The masculine traits that men possess are usually used to justify their abusive nature (O’Neal and Beckman ____ ). The feminist theory emphasises that there is a link between masculinity and violence. Some of these masculine traits include aggression, domination, confidence, and independence (Eckstein 2011). Contradictory to the behaviors men are expected to possess, women are expected to be submissive, empathetic, vulnerable, and patient. Because of these gendered stereotypes that exist, women may be more willing to put up with the men’s abusive nature. They may be scared to retaliate because there could be more severe consequences. The last reason why women may stay in their abusive relationships is due to the fear of losing their child (Mata-Pariente, Plazoala-Castano, & Ruiz-Perez 2006). Women are seen as
nurturing creatures and they are expected to take care of the child while the men are the providers for the family (Eckstein 2011). Once they have established a close relationship with their child, the bond is harder to break. Similar to why women stay in abusive relationships due to financial dependence in the sociological perspective, they may not want to leave because they do not have the means to support themselves or their child. If they are unable to properly take care of the child, they may lose their child to Child Protective Services or lose their child due to a custody battle. The fear of not being able to see their child anymore may be another explanation why these women do not want to leave. The feeling of responsibility of the child may be due to the gendered nature of society. The three theoretical perspectives - the psychological perspective, the sociological perspective, and the feminist perspective - can all the used to explain why women continue to stay in abusive relationships. The psychological perspective supports the ideas that women stay in abusive relationships because of the belief that they can change and that these women are emotionally dependent on their partner. The sociological perspective is used to explain how the financial dependency on their partner and the lack of support from friends and family contribute to a woman's decision to stay in their abusive relationship. The feminist perspective focuses on how the fear of losing their children and the fear of retaliation is linked to a woman’s decision to stay. The question of why women stay in abusive relationships can be seen as victim-blaming. It shifts the responsibility of the abuse onto the victim, which can put more pressure on them along with the abuse. When looking into future research on the literature, it is important to take a note of this issue and to proceed with caution. Some implications for future research is to focus on why men stay in abusive relationships and also look into hmomsexual relationships as well. The violence against women is an ongoing issue that still needs to be addressed in the twenty-first century.
Almost as if they were to be trained as an animal. Second, socioeconomic status was a key factor in abusive relationships. Lower income women are proven to be more frequently victims of domestic violence than wealthier women. Situations where the male partner is underemployed or unemployed, he’s not seeking employment, or they are residing in a poor neighborhood all can have an impact of on abusive relationships. Third, some batterers were abused themselves. Here, batterers were abused during their upbringing whether it be physical, verbal, or sexually abused. They may have also witnessed domestic violence as a part of their childhood. From here, being abusive was embedded in their mind. They were confused about a healthy relationship. Using violence as a means of power and control was the way of life. Boys who witness domestic violence are more likely to batter as an adult. Fourth, race was another factor when being abusive. Black women seem to be more disrespectful towards men and talk out of line resulting in abuse. Black women also worry about the repercussions of reporting domestic violence. A lot of abusive relationships go
Domestic violence has been plaguing our society for years. There are many abusive relationships, and the only question to ask is: why? The main answer is control. The controlling characteristic that males attribute to their masculinity is the cause to these abusive relationships. When males don’t have control they feel their masculinity is threatened and they need to do something about it. This doesn’t occur in just their relationships, but rather every facet of life. Men are constantly in a struggle for power and control whether it is at work, home, during sports, or in a relationship, this remains true. So the only way for them to get this power is for them to be “men”; tough, strong, masculine, ones that demand and take power. Where is this thirst for control coming from? Is it the natural structure of a man or is it a social construct? The answer is that it’s the social construction of a patriarchy that results in this thirst for control due to fear. The fear is being emasculated, whether it is by gayness, or femininity. Men use the fear created from domestic violence to gain control, but yet women do have some control in a relationship it is this vague boundary of how much control that leads to domestic violence.
Although domestic violence is a significant societal problem, which continues to receive public and private sector attention, intervention and treatment programs have proven inconsistent in their success. Statistics by various organization show that many offenders continue to abuse their victims. Approximately 32% of battered women are victimized again, 47% of men who abuse their wives do so at least three times per year (MCFBW). There are many varying fact...
Women will continue to suffer from domestic violence unless there is some sort of intervention to help them. When dealing with this population, it is essential to create a safe environment where the woman can talk freely about the abuse without any retaliation from the abuser. When someone comes into a therapeutic session, everyone deserves to be treated with respect and care. This in turn will create a sense of hope that a different type of life can be possible. Also, knowing that there is a support system can help the woman begin the process of change. Despite this, the process of leaving the abusive partner is slow (Warshaw, n.d.)
In the past century, America has made great leaps in terms of equality. With the efforts made by the civil rights and suffrage movements, all people gained the right to vote. We are even moving forward with marriage equality, and currently fifteen states recognize same-sex marriage. But regardless of all of our progressive institutional movements forward, we continue to socially oppress women. Men’s violence against women has grown to be an internationally recognized epidemic, and will continue to grow unless measures be made to stop it. Domestic violence continues to be prevalent in the lives of many families, and is the primary cause of homelessness in half of cases for women in children. Many women have been forced to alter their behaviors out of fear of being sexually or physically assaulted. One out of every three women is sexually or physically abused in their lifetimes. The first thing that comes to mind is, there are a lot of people abusing women out there. Many people with opposing ideas may claim that men can be victims of violence perpetrated by women, but in instances not used for self-defense, it is rarely part of a systematic pattern of power and control through force or threat of force. In fact, 99% of rape is perpetrated by men, but when confronting men about the issue of violence against women, it is often combated with denial. Jackson Katz writes in his book, The Macho Paradox, “We take comfort in the idea of the aforementioned child-rapist murderer as a horrible aberration. A monster. We’re nothing like him.”(Katz 30). The sad truth is that most women who are raped are raped by men they know, or even men they love. Many men have a hard time believing that saying that most violence is perpetuated by men does not...
Stark (2006) would suggest that thirty years of research has failed to produce a consensus as to what constitutes a case of domestic violence considering that 90% of women who report the abuse have no physical injuries. Methods of coercive control do not meet the criminological viewpoint rather, control extends to financial, emotional, and psychological aspects of subjugating the partner thus no physical violence occurs. If only violent means are reported, then the reported number of victims would perhaps change thus creating a more gender symmetrical pattern. Until operational definitions are defined throughout the disciplines with consistency then there will continue to be discrepancies and opposing views. However, integrative theories of feminist views are being explored which investigate the intersection of not only male dominance as a form of oppression but the use of race, class, national origin, age, sexual orientation, and disability and their impact on intimate partner violence as stated by McPhail and colleagues
An abused woman is always faced with a number of different choices from which she may consider, with regards to seeking help or ending the relationship with a variety of alternatives, the woman knows each decision involves a variety of risks. Time after time, the common question arises, “why doesn’t she just leave?” This question can be answered by analyzing the psychological effects domestic abuse has on women. Many women are unable to cope with the emotional and psychological stress of domestic abuse and resort to violence and extre...
As can been seen when looking at the issue of intimate partner violence, both historically and more recent, much of intimate partner violence is gendered, meaning that men are normally the perpetrators of violence (Hattery and Smith 2017). For this reason, the feminist theory is one of the few middle range theories used to examine intimate partner violence (Hattery and Smith 2017). The assumption of the feminist theory is that patriarchy undergirds everything in human society and allows for the abuse and oppression of women through inequality of power and privilege (Hattery and Smith 2017). Patriarchy shapes individual power within the household, playing on culturally gendered norms and expectations, and institutional power, such as the criminal justice system; the main structures of society (Hattery and Smith 2017). For this reason, this theory focuses on the structural nature of the issue rather than the individual nature of intimate partner violence (Hattery and Smith 2017). Distribution of power allows male partners to abuse their partners and “get away” with it if the injury is not physically visible, or life threatening, it is not considered criminal. Most times the perpetrator of violence does is not prosecuted, whether it be underreporting or lack of follow-through by either the victim or the court system (Hattery and Smith 2017). Feminist theory proposes dismantling patriarchy, or at least the reform the way that intimate partner violence is handled by the court system through accountability (Hattery and Smith 2017). The largest flaw in the feminist theory is that it is said to not address “exceptions to the rule” which are cases where the female partner is the perpetrator; and fails to address violence seen in the LBGTQ community (Hattery and Smith 2017). The assertion that the feminist theory does not adequately explain violence in the LBGTQ community is short sighted. As with any heterosexual relationship, a homosexual relationship,
Psychological abuse is a heterogeneous construct that includes a number of different abusive partner behaviors. Psychological abuse occurs repeatedly over an extended period of
According to Albert Roberts’ Handbook of Domestic Violence Intervention Strategies, “Theorist who advocate this approach believe that abusive situations may be the result of the interaction among personal, situational, social, political, and cultural factors (Roberts, 35). There have been three consistent risk factors for someone to become an abuser. These three include, growing up without a consistent father figure, witnessing domestic violence when they were children, and having been physically or sexually abused (Roberts, 35). An example for the micro system includes drug or alcohol use. An example of a macro system risk factors could include the way society gives a sense of male entitlement or ownership over a woman (Roberts,
Abuse takes on various forms ranging from physical, mental, emotional, and neglect. Abuse is not limited to one particular group culture, but happens to people from all walks of life. Women are often the victims of abuse especially when dealing with spousal or intimate partner valance. Each year, increasingly more women have been reported to be victims of some form of spousal or intimate partner violence. Generally in a relationships abuse being to happen, the abuse begins to forms or a combination of the two. Physical violence or abuse is the first form in which actual violence takes place in the mental abuse. In this form of abuse actual violence does not occur, but the abuser is the demander or belittles the victim, causing the victim to feel worthless; other abusers combine the two forms. The emotional or mental abuse is by far the worst. According to Reed and Enright (2006) “Spousal psychological abuse represents a painful betrayal of trust leading to serious negative psychological outcomes for the abused partner,” (R. The main purpose of spousal or intimate partner abuse, contrary to popular belief, is to inflict emotional pain, not physical pain. There are several categories of spousal psychological abuse; criticizing ridiculing, jealous control, purposeful ignoring, threats of abandonment, threats of harm, and damage to personal property spousal abuse produces a more negative emotional affect when compare to physical abuse. The negative physiological affects produce depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and post traumatic stress disorder.
But we don 't really know why men choose to be violent towards women. A study of the mothers of child abuse victims shows that battering is the most common context for child abuse, that the battering male is the typical child abuser. Feminist theory in domestic violence emphasizes gender and power inequality in opposite-sex relationships. Feminist theory also has to do with gender equalities and how men still believe that they are the superior sex.
Abuse has become so common that some people do not realize they are being abused. It is important that this topic is studied because there are many gaps of knowledge to what all an abusive relationship can entail. The goal is to help someone somewhere get out of an abusive relationship before its too late. Whether its emotional or physical abuse, neither is healthy for a person to maintain in. So seeking relationship advice from outside sources, such as popular press articles may be a usual for tool for people who are looking for insight as long as they know to check up on the research involved in the article. This paper will compare and contrast the findings from the article I have chosen to the scholarly research that has been conducted on abusive relationships.
The effects of abuse may be detrimental to a woman’s reproductive health, as well as to other aspects of her physical health and psychological state. Along with increasing injury, physical abuse can cause an array of other problems such as increased risk of unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, adverse pregnancy complications, chronic pain, physical disability, depression, and drug and alcohol use. Health care providers often miss opportunities to detect if a woman has been abused by either being unaware, indifferent, or judgmental.
Why do women put up with abuse? This question is often the first question people ask, but it is misdirected. Why doesn't she leave? This focuses on the woman’s behavior and not the batterers behavior. Instead we should ask why do men batter? This question is also misinformed. Many women leave every day. Leaving doesn't always mean protection from future violence. Leaving is a multi-staged process.(Sussman) On average a woman leaves and returns six times before she leaves permanently. There are many factors that often help to keep a woman with her batterer.