Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths of a situational leader theory
Strengths of a situational leader theory
Compare different theories of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths of a situational leader theory
Situational Leadership Theory and Organizational Leadership
Introduction
Generally, leadership is defined as the ability to influence an individual or a group of people, usually called the followers, in the achievement of a specific objective (Kiechel, 2012).
In the field of leadership, there have been many theories that explain different types of leadership and styles. In this paper, situational leadership theory will be discussed and its relevance in developing an effective cultured of leadership in an organization (Maslow, 1943).At the same time, the paper will describe three theories of situational leadership including the strengths and weaknesses of each theory when leading staff in the organizational environment.
Situational Leadership
…show more content…
In fact, this theory is considered as some of the simplest leadership theories and easy to apply in an organizational setting.
The Fiedler's Contingency Model
Fiedler's Contingency Model was created in 1976 by Fred Edward Fiedler, who was professor emeritus of management as well as organization at the University of Washington,
Seattle (Kiechel, 2012). Fiedler's contingency model addresses the effectiveness of a group depending on the style of leadership as well as the prevailing situation. Notably, the Fiedler's
Contingency Model is mostly used in helping management to choose suitable leaders for a given - 4 -
[no notes on this page]
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP 5 group type in an organization (Chambers, 2012). One of the key advantages of this theory is that since it is prescriptive; it provides leaders with a tool of creating effective groups through modification of several variables. Further, this model has undergone a lot of research which provides enough wealth of materials in using the model in specific situations. The model
…show more content…
According to Hersey and Blanchard, leadership styles come from - 5 -
[no notes on this page]
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP 6 four key behaviors, which they designated using a letter-number combination: S-1 Telling, S-2
Selling, S-3 Participating and S-4 Delegating.
The two authors argued that the style of leadership manifests itself as behavior that is related to the task as well as behavior as to relationship with a given group. “Telling” behavior refers to the behavior that is related to the unidirectional flow of information to a group from its leader (Lawler, 2014). The “selling” behavior is where a leader tries to convince the group being led by providing the members with both emotional and social support. Additionally, in
“participating” behavior, a leader includes the group members in decision making process.
Finally, “delegating” is the “parceling out” of tasks to the members (Lawler, 2014). One of the strengths of this theory is that its simplicity makes it easy to apply. The application of
In the context of the Situational model leadership theory, there are three identifiable weaknesses in my leadership practice. These weaknesses represent shortcomings in my role as a leader and might prevent my team from fully executing the organization’s mission. The three weaknesses are:
In situational leadership theory and path-goal theory, both theories assume that leaders are flexible and can display any or all styles depending on the situation or environment. Situational leadership theory emphasizes the importance of adjusting leadership style based on the needs of the followers. Path-goal theory leaders help followers along their path and are more effective if they adapt their behaviors to the current environment. Each leadership theory describes four different styles or behaviors to use for effective leadership. The style of telling, selling, participating, and delegating are used in STL...
Situational leadership is a theory which was designed in 1969 by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. The “contingency theories of leadership” states that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent on their behaviours in relation to different situational factors. Thus, situational leadership theory, relates to how a leader 's effectiveness is depend on their ability to adjust their leadership behaviour to the required level of the “followers” capability or if the situation is modified.
A leadership theory is a clarification of some features of leadership; theories have practical importance as they are being used for better understanding, anticipating, and controlling successful leadership. Hence, the main principle of any theory is to inform practice(Lussier and Achua 2009). Leadership theories could be classified into eight main categories: Great man, trait, behavioral, contingency, Situational, Participative, Relationship , management (Cherry 2010).
In this theory leadership style changes as needed to ensure that the goal is achieved (Huber, 2014). Each situation may need to be addressed differently, which requires flexibility by all involved, especially leadership. Managers need to evaluate every individual to understand what they are capable of and how they fit the needs of the institution and or situation (Nash, 2015). As a nurse I think this is a very important trait for a leader to have because of how quickly things change and how we must work within our environment. For example, in healthcare we sometimes have to allow others to take control of a situation on to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient. In addition, the manager needs to ensure that each person works within the scope of their practice, functions at the highest level allowed and completes their tasks. To be a successful leader in healthcare and achieve desired outcomes requires a high level of flexibility by leadership. I would also say that the contingency theory would also fit into my leadership style. The basis premise of this theory is that each situation is different and leadership needs to take that into account when managing a situation (Huber, 2014). At times a leader needs to look at the bigger picture and incorporate that in their decision making process. When looking at a specific situation taking input from all parties involved can lead to a more effective solution. We can learn a lot form those around us and need to take that in account to be an effective
Edwin T. Cornelius III defined leadership style as the broad, characteristic way in which a leader interacts with others across in various situations and occasions. (Cornelius, 2006) However, many researchers would agree that leadership style is merely traits and they can change within an organization or between different situations. Annick M. Brennen in an article stated: A study of leadership styles therefore deals mainly with the manner in which the leader carries out his/her leadership functions or roles–the use of authority and power and the approach to the decision-maki...
Hogg, M., & van Knippenberg D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 35, 1-52.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).
Some people believe leadership and management are one in the same; however, this is not true because management involves planning, staffing, directing and controlling and, a manager is a person who performs these functions (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). The term manager is a formal title given to a person who has authority by virtue of his or her position or office. (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009) Leadership, by contrast, is about influence; leaders use factors other than just their formal authority to influence subordinates. There are three major leadership theories developed from the 1930s to the 1970s which attempt to explain why some leaders are better than others, these theories are: trait leadership (1930s and 1940s), behavior leadership (1940s and 1950s), and contingency leadership (1960s and 1970s).
One prominent leadership style that began came from The Iowa Studies that were conducted by Kurt Lewin, Ronald Lippett and Ralph White in 1939. Kurt Lewin was the social scientist in charge of the study. They were called the “Iowa Leadership Studies”. This study put leadership styles into three distinct categories of authoritarian, democratic, and laissez-faire leaders and group dynamics (Smith, 2001). The study was interested in the analysis of group interactions and the organizational application of each leadership style. It also takes into account exactly how a leader determines when they direct others or have others participate, and when to delegate to others.
We can divide the theories that deal with leadership in 3 chronological groups. First were the trait theories. Until the 1940's, research in the field of leadership was dominated by these theories. Second came the behavioral theories which were very influent until the late 1960's. Finally, contingency theories are the most modern theories about leadership.
The behavior approach refocuses the interest from the traits to the leaders ' behavior. Leaders ' behavior becomes more important than their physical, mental or emotional traits. Ohio State University and the University of Michigan developed the two main studies of this approach in the late 1940s and 1950s. The studies have recognized two main behaviors: people-oriented and production-oriented behavior. According to the leader behavior approach, there are several behaviors that would be invariably effective for leaders, but empirical research does not show a strong relation between task-oriented or person-oriented leader behaviors and leader effectiveness.
In addition, (Amandi et al, 2004) makes us understand issues related to leadership decision and also gives a clear overview on leadership theories.
There are many different types of theories on leadership. There is Fiedler’s contingency theory, situational theories of leadership and House’s path-goal theory. These theories are used to make an individual or manager a more effective leader. They can be used as a guide for individuals and help them achieve whatever goal is set out by their organization or group.
...ne K. D., Sheats P., ‘Functional Roles of Group Members’ (Bill Staples, ICA Associates Inc. 2007)