Carson DiPascal English IV Mrs. Schroder 4/25/18 1984 vs The Hunger Games In 1984 the people of Oceania deal with the oppression where Big Brother scrutinizes people and their actions. This book can be compared with many other books that have different societal means. 1984 can be compared with the Hunger Games by the government, people, and society alone. 1984 shows dictatorship in Oceania. Big Brother and the inner party are above everyone else. After that leaves the outer parties which is the middle party, and at the bottom are the proles which makes up about 85% of the whole population. The Hunger games shows dictatorship in the same way but not as harsh. In the games President Snow and his officials are at the top of the food chain. Under …show more content…
them lies all of the districts, but the first few districts located closest to the capitol have more advantages, and the rest are left at the bottom. Under each dictatorship this have different rules but with the same mindset in a way.
Big Brother focuses on thought control for the proles. They are not super rigorous about it but Big Brother does try to restrict who talks to who, how they interact, and avoid talking about social values. The Hunger Games controls the districts speech when it comes to social values, and any disagreements with Capital is taken care of immediately. Now for both books, the children are forced into specific programs. For 1984, all children are put in something called the Junior Spies. This is a time where the people in the party persuade the next generation to spy on their parents to make sure they are faithful to the party. For the kids that find their parents doing things that didnt honor Big Brother, would have to report to the party about their parents with the result of them getting in trouble for their actions. The Hunger Games system only involves two children ages twelve through eighteen years old from each district. The two children are forced to fight for their lives against every other district, and everybody is forced to watch this event. These two events are very different but they both have a way of splitting up families of the less fortunate. 1984 turns the kids against their parents making a divide in their homes, and in The Hunger Games President Snow basically takes the lives of young …show more content…
children. Enemies play big parts in each book.
Conflicts between disagreement or hatred revolves around the whole plot of the two books. Oceania has problems with Eurasia and Eastasia because they all have similar ideas. Although they are enemies, the three continents have an agreement to stay at war just so they stay diverse. Now for the Hunger Games its different. All the districts hate President Snow for what he puts them against and forces them to do, but there is no fighting against it and because of that and the Hunger Games, the districts are out to kill each other for the sake of their individual lives. They may not have any hatred against these districts but killing shows an act of having enemies. Hatred from the Proles and the people from the districts for society is easily comparable because of how they are forced to live under dictatorship. Winston and Julia always find ways to quietly talk about the party and rebelling. Over time they have found ways around the party so that they won't be caught when talking about it. Katniss and Gale have the same idea of rebelling in the Hunger Games. After they are selected, they attempt to get the whole district to stop watching the Hunger Games because it is a mandatory event to watch. If everyone rebelled against watching what would the leaders
do? Since dictatorship plays a big role in both books, someone could basically assume that the way the lower parties live are pretty much the same. The lower halves in each book were all unhygienic. It always smelt bad and it was extremely dark and gloomy with grey houses and black streets, and all the people look very unhealthy. Although these two books have different concepts, both authors had some very similar ideas with the background details that revolves around the characters and the plot.
1984 takes place in an alternate-reality future where after World War 2, the world was divided into three main nations: Eastasia, Eurasia, and the super-country, Oceania. The book is set in Oceania in the year 1984, in the city of London, Airstrip One. Oceania is in a constant state of war against the two other countries, with bombings occurring daily and the living conditions extremely poor – very little food, very little clothing, and broken down housing. The Party rules over Oceania, with telescreens in almost every room that monitor every move a person makes, as well as anything they say. Posters hang everywhere with the phrase – BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU.
Another blaring difference between the two societies in Fahrenheit 451 and the Hunger Games is that of their government. The form of government in Fahrenheit 451 consists of a democracy whereas the Hunger Games government is corrupt and resembles nothing of a democracy. Even though we may see the world of Fahrenheit 451 as strange and bad there is still a democracy, which we consider to be fair. A similarity between the two governments systems would be how they both suppress things much like it is today, that each government believes could hurt the stability of society. The Hunger Games government suppresses interaction between districts to instill conformity because they know if there was interaction it could cause unhappiness and take away from the level of cooperation between the people and the government.
1984 was written in 1948 and published in 1949 by Eric Arthur Blair under the pen name ‘George Orwell’. It is set in the year 1984 in Airstrip One, which is a province in the country of Oceania. The world is in a constant state of war between Oceania, and the other two countries, Eurasia and Eastasia. Oceania is controlled by English Socialism, or INGSOC in Oceania’s language, Newspeak. The powerful Inner Party controls the country using omnipresent surveillance, and manipulation. Every part of life is regimented and controlled, but the only crime is ‘thoughtcrime’: independent thinking and individualism. Big Brother is the figurehead of the Inner Party, and throughout the book, it is heavily implied that he may not really exist. The people
middle of paper ... ... Due to the travesty of 9/11 society today lives in post 9/11 fear where citizens want protective polices in place but don't want those actions used against them. What government has done is manipulate this fear, while 1984 helps those who welcomed intrusive surveillance question this as another form of government manipulation to bolster government power over its citizens. Ultimately, common ideas found in the novel 1984, totalitarianism, surveillance, and lack of privacy are also ubiquitous in modern society and government.
Complete governmental control develops as an apparent theme of both 1984 and The Hunger Games. 1984 uses the concept of big brother for the sole purpose of instilling a dependence on the government for every aspect in the citizens’ lives. Similarly, the capitol of Panem in The Hunger Games censors information from the people so that any idea of revolution will be instantaneously
1984 is about a totalitarian form of government that has taken over the country of Oceania. In this country, Big Brother controls all. He is the leader of The Party, which is the only form of leadership present in Oceania. A mystery that presents itself throughout the book, is whether or not Big Brother, the person, does or ever actually existed. Everything The Party does, ...
The fictional world of 1984 is best described as bleak. In the aftermath of the fall of capitalism and nuclear war, the world has been divided among three practically identical totalitarian nation-states. The novel takes place in London, which has become a part of Oceania, the nation state comprising the Americas and western Europe. A state of perpetual war and poverty is the rule in Oceania. However, this is merely a backdrop, far from the most terrifying aspect of life in 1984. Oceania is governed by a totalitarian bureaucracy, personified in the image of Big Brother, the all-knowing/ all-seeing godlike figure that represents the government. Big Brother is best described as a "totalitarian socialist dictator, a political demagogue and religious cult leader all rolled into one." So great is the power of Big Brother that the reader is unsure whether he actually exists or is simply a propaganda tool of the government. The party of Big Brother, Ingsoc (English Social...
"There is no week nor day nor hour when tyranny may not enter upon this country, if the people lose their roughness and spirit of defiance" (Walt Whitman). In the novel The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, Katniss is a young girl from District 12, who lives in a society which finds great entertainment in the organized killing of children. These bloodbaths are constructed by the Capitol into an event known as the Hunger Games. In the Hunger Games, kids are thrown into a huge arena and forced to fight to the death. Katniss`s younger sister Prim is chosen to participate in the Hunger Games but Katniss volunteers to take her place as tribute. Over the course of the Hunger Games and the events that proceed it, Katniss changes from being impulsive and feeling impotent into a rational revolutionist, who quietly defies the capitol and takes a stand for what is right.
Furthermore, the omnipotent powers of the two films are also proven to be similar. The authorities displayed in both movies completely control all things regarding their people. They make unethical and inhumane plans that endanger the citizens of their land. The Capitol of the film “The Hunger Games” uses its people to fight to death for entertainment and the Divergent government uses mind control to get their army to do whatever they are told. These government authorities, in both films, treat their people as puppets who are forced under their
1984 by George Orwell is an extremely negative outlook on a futuristic, seemingly utopian society. People inhabiting the land of Oceania are enslaved to the government, most without even realizing it. The Party uses its many members to enforce its methods of control on the population. While a bit extreme, Orwell was attempting to warn people about the dangers of totalitarianism.
First, a little background on The Hunger Games. Panem, where the Capitol is located, was established and led by President Snow as a totalitarian dictatorship. The nation was divided into districts, called nation-states. Each district was responsible for producing, procuring, or refining goods in a particular industry. Each district provides something different for the Capitol, and in return they have no influence concerning the national politics of Panem.
Since she is the female victor from district 12, she is in the 74th Hunger Games. She sees how painful and scary it is and so she tries to stop the capital which is who is controlling everything. She doesn’t want that to happen to anyone else. She rebels against President Snow in plan of eventually killing him to take over the capital and change the world. Teens can relate to this because a lot of the time we feel controlled. It might be by a parent, teacher, grandparent or someone else but all of us are controlled by someone. A lot of teenagers end up rebelling because they feel as if they have no choices. They go against the rules of who they are rebelling against. That persons rules and values are not necessarily right. Who decides what is right? It seems as if we have entered into a state time where there is no right and wrong. Katniss breaks free of that control and does her own thing. Another way teens can relate to the hunger games is through the love triangle. Some of us might have a similar situation of where we might like two people. In the movie it says, “What I need is not Gales fire, kindled with rage and hatred. I have plenty of fire myself. What I need is the dandelion in the spring. The bright yellow that means rebirth instead of destruction. The promise that life can go on, no matter how bad our losses. That it can be good again. And only Peeta can
In the book The Hunger Games, the social class system set up by the Capitol causes people to be treated very unfairly based on where they are born. The majority of the plot is based around the fact that this society is built on social classes. The population is broken into 13 districts that determine people’s wealth and jobs. There is the Capitol then the remaining 12 districts are numbered 1 through 12. Each of these district is responsible for the production of a certain item. Districts 1 through 4 are wealthy and produce mostly electronics and luxury goods. From there the districts start to get worse and worse all the way down to District 12. In this society, the Capitol has all the power and the money. This gives them complete control over the lives of all the people isolated in their districts.
The Hunger Games that follows, the term that defines a dystopian fiction. One main belief that defines Dystopian society is the development into a “hierarchical society” (“Dystopia”). A hierarchical society plays a big part in the story that outline the whole plot. For example, Capitol is wealthier than all the districts. Some districts are more privileged than others. The Careers, being tributes from districts one to three, are prepared and trained for years before the games. However, this is illegal, but because of the support towards District two from the Capitol, they are let off, along with District one and District four, the other richer districts. In this cas...
The Hunger Games, a film based off of a novel written by Susan Collins, was released in March of 2012. The film, and the book it was based on, chronicles the struggles of a girl named Katniss Everdeen, a girl who lives in a poverty stricken province or “District”, until untimely circumstances forces her to play in the Hunger Games, a gladiatorial like contest where children between the ages of 12 and 18 are forced to fight to the death. A contest that was set up by an oppressive and authoritarian government, and has thus far been sustained via the forced obedience of the rebellious Districts, the brainwashing and conditioning of Districts 1 and 2, and the conditioning of the residents of its Capitol. The movie has a variety of messages, most especially in regards to social control and social conditioning. With these ideas in mind, a case could very well be made that The Hunger Games, throughout its two hour long run time, shows a very realistic look at a socially conditioned society and what humanity can become with the right amount of conditioning and control by an authoritarian force.