Similarities Between Taweret And Venus Of Willendorf

1176 Words3 Pages

In the Late Period, 26th Dynasty, 664-525 BCE, ancient Egyptians created several sculptures in which depict various gods and goddesses as a worship symbol for various practices. The statuette of Taweret (Plate 1-3) is a perfect example of a animalistic representation of the goddess Taweret, and the power that encased the meaning of the relic for the Egyptians. The sculpture now remains in the Hallie Ford Museum of Art in Salem, Oregon, as it was a gift of James and Aneta McIntyre. The approximately six inch tall statue remains in perfect condition, displayed with other statuettes who speak for the ancient Egyptian culture.
    Taweret is usually depicted as a pregnant hippopotamus, wearing a short, cylindrical headdress topped with two plumes …show more content…

The “Venus of Willendorf” (Plate 4) was another figure that was expressed as a female fertility figure. Both of these sculptures illustrated a goddess with a great emphasis on the reproductive parts, the enlargement and exaggeration of the breasts, and the stomach. Additionally, both sculptors approached a similar technique, carving away from a larger mass of stone in the subtractive technique. Also creating an overall sculpture in the round, allowing the viewer to view all sides of the three-dimensional object. Furthermore, the pieces are small in scale as Taweret stands about six inches tall and “Venus” at only four inches. Not only is the overall shape and height of the sculptures are similar in many ways, but the patterning is also featured in alike ways. Depicted on the head of “Venus” and the headdress on Taweret, there are small spheres in horizontal and vertical lines, or wrapping around the head in a circular pattern. On the other hand, there are several contrasting aspects of the two pieces that enhance the context behind their different …show more content…

While the statue of Taweret was founded in Egypt during the late period, 26th century, “Venus of Willendorf” originally came from southern Austria ca. 28,000-23,000 BCE in the Paleolithic Period. The materials used for the subtractive sculpture also different, not only in the overall color, but also the texture of the form. Taweret was made from basalt, which is a volcanic rock, and created a smooth black surface to the animalistic goddess. However, “Venus” is carved from limestone, which is a light brown color and creates a rough texture to the touch. Finally, the main differentiated aspect of the figures revolves around the contrasting features of the animalistic and humanistic representation of the goddesses. As explained before, Taweret is depicted as a hippopotamus, presumably carefully observed to obtain a realistic image of the animal. Contrastingly, the sculptor of “Venus of Willendorf” did not aim for naturalism in shape and proportion, but instead consciously chooses to enhance the reproductive parts and the curvature of the female figure to suggest the importance of fertility through the goddess. Yet, interestingly enough left the female face out of the sculpt, but instead suggested only a mass of curly hair through stylization, or some argued a woven hat made from plant fibers. This left mystery and neglection of deity identification during this period, and not a

Open Document