More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences between plutarch and shakespeares portrayal of julius caesar
Plutarch’s life: caesar comparison to julius caesar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Plutarch’s account of the death of Julius Caesar is calm and factual. He gives a probable explanation for most of the peoples’ actions that he describes; these explanations lengthen the actual death of Caesar. Shakespeare wrote the death of Caesar much more concisely; the actual murder of Caesar is only two spoken lines long in Shakespeare’s narration. Although Shakespeare’s adaptation of Caesar’s death is briefer, numerous similarities can be found between the two classic accounts. Shakespeare and Plutarch both detailed Brutus’s betrayal in their stories. In each case, Julius Caesar was completely unaware and unsuspicious, and utterly abandoned his will to live once he discovered that Brutus came to kill him as well. The commoners and officials
A Comparison of Plutarch's The Lives of the Ancient Grecians and Romans and Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
Taking a look back the tyrannical ruler of Rome Julius Caesar came to a very sticky end when his best friend, Marcus Brutus, took part in the cons pirated against him and planned his murder. Although Brutus joined the Roman senate to revolt against Caesar for the goodwill of Rome only despite objection from his wife, Brutus accompanied a group of disgruntled senators who savagely attacked Caesar. Caesar also ignored see it coming – particularly since the iconic line, “Et tu, Brutus?”7 the last lines before his demise.
Plutarch was a prominent Greek biographer who was born in the small town of Chaeronea in 46 AD and died in 120 AD. His most recognized piece of writing was the Livesof Noble Grecians and Romanoes which first published in 1579. Since Lives was written in Plutarch’s native tongue Greek, it was later translated into French by Jacques Amyot of Melun. Amyot’s French translation was then translated into English by Sir Thomas North. According to Geoffrey Bullough’s Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, Sir Thomas North’s translated version of Plutarch’s Lives of Noble Grecians and Romanoes is where Shakespeare draws most of his information from for his famous tragedy Julius Caesar. (Bullough 12)
almost as Fate were deeming it necessary for him to die, and that he had no
Brutus was a man of noble birth. He had multiple servants and was often referred to as “Lord”, which indicates a certain level of respect for him. He was a very highly thought of person in Rome. At no point did he ever betray anyone, although he did kill Caesar, he did it to better Rome, not to mislead him. Everything he did was for the advantage of someone else. Even after Brutus dies, Marc Antony says “This was the noblest roman of them all; all the conspirators, save only he, did that they did in the envy of Caesar; he only in a general honest thought and common good to all...” This shows that regardless of brutus killing Caesar, he is still considered noble because he had good intentions. Brutus was also the best friend of Julius Caesar, the most powerful man in Rome. Had he been a commoner, Caesar most likely would not have associated with him or trusted him as a friend.
The play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare showcases many characters and events that go through many significant changes. One particular character that went through unique changes was Julius Caesar. The 16th century work is a lengthy tragedy about the antagonists Brutus and Cassius fighting with the protagonists Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus over the murder of Julius Caesar. Although the play’s main pushing conflict was the murder of Julius Caesar, he is considered a secondary character, but a protagonist. Throughout the theatrical work Julius Caesar’s actions, alliances, character developments, and internal and external conflicts display his diverse changes. William Shakespeare retold a very unique event
When Brutus betrayed Caesar for the good of Rome by killing him, he had no idea that he would regret it later on in his life. Brutus wanted to kill Caesar because he thought that if Caesar became king, he would forget who his real friends are and he would not pay attention to them. He also thought that Caesar would become too powerful and therefore did not want him to be king. This is shown when Portia says, “…Brutus hath a suit / that Caesar will not grant…” (2.4.41-42). Although Brutus had a clear conscience, the people of Rome did not. This eventually led to Brutus being driven out of Rome by the citizens. Not being associated with Rome anymore made Brutus’ life worse and he eventually took his own life as the only way to...
Ultimately, Brutus’s tragic flaw was his honor, and his demise was his death. Brutus shows that he is honorable through his choices to murder Caesar. Caesar was his close friend, and Brutus cared for him. However, Brutus joined the conspirators because of his honor towards the Roman people. Cassius and the other conspirators had faked and sent letters to Brutus that made him believe that the public did not like Caesar.
Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar “boldly, but not angerly.”(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.
Brutus has several tragic flaws. One of these tragic flaws is how he trusts people a lot. Brutus says that he “know[s] that we shall have [Antony] well to a friend” (1140). He trusts Antony will be a friend of the conspirators, yet he seems to not realize that Antony is obliviously against them, because they killed his friend. Brutus trusts Antony so much, that he lets Antony speak to the public alone. Antony turns the people against Brutus and the conspirators, leading to the wars where Brutus takes his own life. Brutus also receives letters, supposedly from the people of Rome. As he reads the letter out loud, Brutus remarks “‘Speak, strike, redress!’ Am I entreated to speak and strike? O Rome, I make thee promise, if thy redress will follow, thy receivest thy full petition at the hand of Brutus” (1118).
In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar we find that when a leader is wrongfully murdered absolute political chaos ensues. Brutus our protagonist is the poster child for the position of tragic hero, the one who starts off in such a high position and winds up with nothing, but he can only blame himself. As he and several other conspirators plot to kill Caesar for no logical reason other than lust and Caesar’s ambition. He justifies his actions through fallacies and illogical thoughts and his downfall is that he is eventually slain in the same manor as his victim. Brutus has several character flaws that he is unable to over come and this among the cunning of his political enemies leads to his downfall.
In Plutarch’s lives, Antony seems like a man who was easily taken up by vices. He also, though, seems like a man who could live a life of hardship just as fast as he could live a life of pleasantries. He also appears to be somewhat gullible or at least unobservant of the things around him. In Shakespeare, Antony seems like a man who is simply controlled by his own passions. He loves Cleopatra yet he sometimes hates her because of her control over him.
For even his good intentions and conviction that "did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake" could not convince the Roman people to adopt his worldview (4.3.19). And, despite the fact that Brutus "only, in a general honest thought and common good to all, made one of [the conspirators]," he had to die with his vision unfulfilled and with the Roman republic in a worse state than it started the play in (5.5.72-73). Due to the errors Brutus makes throughout the play and the harm that befalls him as a result, he represents the true tragic hero of Julius Caesar. For despite holding one of the few sets of good intentions in the play, Brutus ultimately suffers and dies farther away from achieving his dreams than he started from.
At first glance, historical literature may seem like mere retellings of repeated events. However, by analyzing the author and their intentions, one can understand the underlying message and its applications to society. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is a rendition of Julius Caesar’s demise and the civil war sparked by it. Shakespeare uses his play as a political mouthpiece to voice his concern for the future of England’s government, since during Queen Elizabeth’s reign, the tensions were high due to the threat of a civil war. By examining events and occurrences associated with the Elizabethan time period, Julius Caesar, and the Roman Empire, one can understand William Shakespeare’s political motivations and historical influences.
William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar is centralized on the debate of whether or not man is bound to a fate predestined by some divine force hidden within the stars or a fate controlled by one’s own actions. Based on Sir Thomas North’s Plutarch’s historical accounts, Shakespeare depicts the characters within the play to believe that fate is either controlled by the divine, as indicated through portents or omens, Roman values, or human decision alone. However, Shakespeare ultimately makes the argument that the decisive actions of humans, both good and bad, are what ultimately shape history and therefore fate. Through the use of Plutarch’s writings, Shakespeare develops the life and death of Julius Caesar into a tragedy determined not by the fault