Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the Jim Crow Laws
Discrimination in the united states
Martin luther king malcolm x comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the Jim Crow Laws
Over past decades, the black community in the US has gone through a total catastrophe, regardless of the Civil Rights Act. There have been and still is a significant voting inequality throughout the south in the nation. Unequal acts continues to oppress the black community. When the blacks try to protest their way out of oppression, the white community is infuriated. Some physical menaces involve southerners bombing black churches and lynching innocent people. At this period of time, African American kneel down and cry with no hope. But there is hope. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are two activist who seem to have the solution to the discrimination. However, these two men have their own distinctive method of trying to solve the same …show more content…
X claims that non violence makes their community defenseless. Malcolm demonstrates the unfortunate oppression all black people has gone through: “You catch hell ‘cause you’re a black man. You catch hell, all of us catch hell, for the same reason” (X 35). X wants to emphasize the fact that white southerners are their enemies: we have a common oppressor, a common exploiter, and a common discriminator.” (X 52). He wants to deliver the message to the audience that whites are their oppressors and the only way for freedom is to fight back. X states how a “revolution” can only happen if blood is involved. Ultimately, Malcolm X is furious for what his race has gone through. He translates this fury into a concept of rebelling back to the white …show more content…
King’s distinctive tactic seems to be dominant over Malcolm X’s, as Dr. King thrives to keep the country intact while trying to resolve the catastrophe. King has a clear plan in ending racial segregation. Instead of blatantly going against the white southerners, King wants to negotiate, purify, and be involved in direct actions, all in a non-violent manner. He wishes to take it step by step, and gradually change, not forced, white’s opinion on blacks. On the other hand, Malcolm X, at the end of the story, wants to crush this oppression, even if it could segregate the black and white community apart: “A revolution is bloody. Revolution is hostile. Revolutions knows no compromise. Revolution overturns and destroys everything that gets in its way” (320). Malcolm has a closed mind, where he wished to only resolve the conflict of racial discrimination. If Malcolm ends oppression with segregation, the country would continue to be full of menace. Southerners would never respect african american. They would not change their opinion of how all black people are “barbaric.” Trying to force freedom would not actually end up in freedom. In contrast, King looks at the process as a whole, and hopes to truly end the oppression without major segregation. In essence, Dr. King’s sophisticated method of working with the white community seems to be the best
...ack Nationalism to coexistence. He pointed out how America can live without racial problems that it had since slavery. This was a road trip for Malcolm X from the Nation of Islam which used the name of Islam to promote its own social and political agenda to that of true Islam, which allows Malcolm X to see an alternative approach towards his objectives.. George Breitman in his book “The Last Year of Malcolm X” states “…if they adopt Malcolm’s strategy, accept his legacy and develop it n accord with the logic of the direction in which he was moving during his last year, then all of America will be transformed…” Reading the Ballot or the Bullet after knowing this will make one think beyond the actual words that are mentioned in the speech. Today, because of his boldness, Malcolm X is viewed by many, alongside Martin Luther King Jr., as a great civil rights leader.
The 20th century was a definitive time period for the Black civil rights movement. An era where the status quo was blatant hatred and oppression of African Americans, a time when a black son would watch his father suffer the indignity of being called a “boy” by a young white kid and say nothing in reply but “yes sir”. Where a Black person can be whipped or lynched for anything as little as not getting off the sidewalk when approaching a white person, for looking into their eyes, or worse, “for committing the unpardonable crime of attempting to vote.” In the midst of the racial crises and fight for social equality were Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. who despite their difference in philosophies were “icons of social justice movement both in the United States and around the world” .
He talks about the extent of brainwashing the Black community was under at the time. He wants to begin addressing the issue with African Americans in releasing themselves from the mindset that they are inferior in comparison to what he calls the “White man”. Malcolm X stresses the importance of the Black community of having to understand that their success isn’t dictated by another race rather than their own selves. He wants his race to change their mindsets as desegregation laws are taking place, because if they don’t, that will still exist mentally within their community and they won’t be able to properly value themselves as who they are. Belief in yourself is essential for your
In history we know that no two men are alike but, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were phenomenal people and leaders. Both had visualized some type of change in the future, yet were not literally able to see it. Both Dr. King and Malcolm X set out to bring a sense of confidence to blacks all over the United States. Their main purpose was to help instill black’s power and strength so that they could overcome racial disparity and prejudice that surrounded them, but both of them had very unique and distinct different ways of promoting their message. Martin was more geared and focused on equality and wellness of the world as a whole, a Malcolm X’s personal interpretation of the world was very well blinded by anger, bitterness, and the desire to get revenge at the expense of the world that he thought treated him unfairly.
the sense that they must stand together against the suppression of the whites and that they must endure their "non-Americanism" amongst the company of one another,. Yet, as soon as he has done this, Malcolm X. turns to make, what might seem, a paradoxical and fairly non-artistic.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. African Americans are fortunate to have leaders who have fought for a difference in Black America. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X are two powerful men in particular who brought hope to blacks in the United States. Both preached the same message about Blacks having power and strength in the midst of all the hatred that surrounded them. Even though they shared the same dream of equality for their people, the tactics they implied to make these dreams a reality were very different. The background, environment and philosophy of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X were largely responsible for the distinctly varying responses to American racism.
In his speech, “The Ballot or the Bullet,” Malcolm X’s tone is objective, yet motivating and optimistic, as he describes the theory of black nationalism, which he thinks all blacks must embrace in order to unite as a community under a single goal, to achieve equality. Through the use of factual evidence, schemes, and personal pronouns, Malcolm X builds on his ethos as he makes himself a more credible, trustworthy speaker about the dire situation of blacks. In the beginning of the speech, Malcolm X builds a personal profile of himself, as he mentions that he is a Muslim. However, after doing so, he disregards religion, claiming it does not matter. He states, “Whether we are Christians or Muslims or nationalists or agnostics, or atheists, we must first learn to forget our differences.” His authoritative and didactic tone here contributes to his ethos as it makes him sound credible.
Even though Malcolm X was speaking violence into the minds of many fellow African Americans, he persuaded them to use violence against people but only if it seemed necessary. Many people went against what he believed in because of this. They did not agree it was the right way to handle this situation especially since there was already violence present from the racist.
Malcolm X: His very name is a stab to the beliefs of the white supremacists of his time"X" symbolizing "the rejection of slave-names' and the absence of an inherited African name to take its place." Similarly, in his speech "The Ballot or the Bullet", Malcolm X denounces the actions of the white population, without any attempts to appeal to them; his approach to the civil rights issue is in complete opposition to the tactics of other civil rights leaders of his time, such as Martin Luther King, Jr. Rather than trying to integrate the black community into the white, he focuses on the complete separation of them: he doesn't want the blacks to integrate into the white hotels, he wants blacks to own the hotels. He believed that the black population had to break the psychological, cultural, economic, and political dependency on their oppressors. By using tactical phrasing of his sentences that connects to his audience emotionally, Malcolm X attacks the tendency of African-Americans to identify with White America, and insists they identify instead with Africans, their ancestors; thus, he promotes his purpose: to instill a feeling of self-respect and self-help in his fellow African-Americans, which in turn is the stepping stone to the liberation of the Black people.
The Negro revolution is a stagnant fight; the black revolution is a fight with one decisive winner. In this talk of revolution he also pointed out the hypocrisy of the American people on the subject of violence. How many black people will to go war for a country that hates them and do not even want them in the country, but when a white man strikes them they turned a blind eye because “peace” is the answer. “If violence is wrong in America, violence is wrong abroad”(MalcomX, Message to the Grassroots), many people would agree with this sentiment. Why condemn those who want to fight for something they believe in using violence when we as a country are doing the same thing overseas. Later in the speech, Malcolm X calls out the modern house Negros we have today in the United States. A house Negro was the slaves who stayed in the living quarter with their master and were maids and butlers and tended to the children. The latter are the filed Negros who worked in the fields and stayed in
King traveled the country making speeches and inspiring people to become involved in the Civil Rights Movement. He organized non-violent student sit-ins and fought for the rights of the black population. In his speech, he proclaimed a free and better nation of equality and that both races, the blacks and the whites, should join together to achieve common ground and to support each other instead of fighting against one another. King’s vision is that all people should be judged by their “personality and character and not by their color of skin”(‘I Have a Dream”). All the points he made in his speech were so strong that lots of people were interested in his thoughts. He dreamed of a land where the blacks could vote and have a reason to vote and where every citizen would be treated the same and with the same justice.
In order to prove to his audience of what power they could have when they unite and that they have been made “chumps” by a “white nationalist” government, Malcolm X builds his speech on the three rhetorical proofs. He uses logos in the form of deductive reasoning and occurrences to show that black people have been victimized by the white-run government, and to give them a solution; he uses ethos to establish his character and status as a freedom fighter as well as to bring together black Americans; and he uses pathos through repetition a...
Malcolm X was a freedom fighter like Dr. King who fought for the right and freedoms for black Americans. Unlike Malcolm, Dr. King called black Americans blacks while Malcolm called them Negros. Malcolm used violence in his fight for freedom when he said, “Revolution was based upon bloodshed”. Malcolm was ready for anything as far as blacks will gain the respect and freedom they needed. In Malcolm’s black revolution, he made it clear how blacks were treated differently no matter their age, what school they came out of, no matter what their intellectual or professional level was, they were still recognized as a boy and were not given the respect they deserved. He also pointed out how whites made them think they had different goals and objectives.
Malcolm's father Earl Little believed that freedom, independence, and self-respect could not be achieved by the black man so the black man should return back to Africa. By returning back to Africa, the black man will finally be able to reach their full potential. I viewed this statement as political because back in the 1940's and 1950's African-American people had very limited opportunities given to them by their government and their peers based solely on the color of their skin. This statement brings me back to when the movie first began and you Malcolm's voice speaking to a crowd, He says, " You are a victim of an American because you were forced to come here, Being born here does not make you an American". The movie then shifts back to race when Malcolm begins to talk about his mother.
Malcolm X philosophy suits better to address the problems in the black community today. Malcolm X points out many issues that affect the black community today such as, people not being informed enough to understand or try to understand how politics work, or even know how to trust the people that supposedly want to change the community to better when in reality these people just change the community for the worst. In the speech Malcolm X says, “We must, we must understand the politics of our community and we must know what politics is supposed to produce. We must know what part politics play in our lives. And until we become politically mature, we will always be misled, led astray, or deceived or maneuvered into supporting someone politically