John Brown
“If it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice, and mingle my blood further with the blood of my children and with the blood of millions in this slave country whose rights are disregarded by wicked, cruel, and unjust enactments-I submit; so let it be done.” Imagine this man as a person who decided to make a change in the world and fight for what is right. John Brown was one of the major abolitionists and had the audacity to achieve his many accomplishments. This paper will cover his early life, life as an abolitionist, later life with events that lead to his death, his last speech, including how it impacted many others, and how Harriet Tubman and John Brown were alike/not alike.
…show more content…
John Brown was born on May 9, 1800 to a deeply religious family in Torrington, Connecticut (“John Brown” 2). His parents were Ruth Mills and Owen Brown (“John Brown Biography 2). The family moved to Ohio when John was five. Owen had a deep belief in the bible and that slavery was wrong. He then instilled it in his son that would later inspire him to be an abolitionist in his life. Another motive was when twelve year old John witnessed an enslaved African american boy beaten(“John Brown Biography” 2). This left a mental scar that would impact him for a long time. When the Browns traveled through Michigan, John studied to work for the ministry and learned about trade until he finally decided to work for his father’s trade business(“John Brown” 2). During his adulthood, Brown married Dianthe Lusk in 1820 and decided to have seven children before her death in 1831. Brown then married sixteen year old Mary Ann Day in the next year and she would give birth to thirteen more children. “He would father twenty children.” ( PBS, John Brown 3). John would later face many financial difficulties, hardships of being a conductor, and also many risks taken as an abolitionist including having his own life taken from him. In 1855, John and his boys traveled to Kansas after the extension of slavery to the states(“John Brown” 3). He then participated in the Underground railroad as a conductor. John had played with the idea but never gone through with starting an anti-slavery group. It was not long after that he made himself captain of the force(“John Brown” 4). What had motivated him to do such was the proslavery guerillas(“John Brown” 3). Near Pottawatomie creek, John, four of his sons, and two men murdered five proslavery settlers. After this attack, Brown was a hero of the north and a villain of the south as he grew his reputation(“John Brown” 5). In 1858, there was a gathering in Chatham, Ontario which then led to an army of insurrectionists including three of his sons, to form a rebellion of slaves. This rebellion had an interference in North Virginia and also made a stronghold so escapees could leave. Many abolitionists recoiled from Brown’s violence towards anti-slavery. Although some gave donations while still disliking his plans, there were a group called the “secret six”(“John Brown” 4). Their names were Franklin Sanborn, Thomas Wentworth Higginson, George Luther Stearns, Gerrit Smith, Samuel Gridley Howe, and Theodore Parker. This group was Brown’s main financial supporters(“John Brown” 4). In 1859 Brown rented a farm near Harper’s Ferry. On October 16, the group of twenty-one men raided Harper’s Ferry. Colonel Robert E. Lee”s militia quickly cornered the group and by the end of the raid, brown found himself captured with 10 of his followers dead. Not long after John was captured, he was moved to Charlestown, Virginia where he was tried and convicted for treason(“John Brown” 7). On November 2nd, John was found guilty and was sentenced to death(“John Brown” 11). He stated that his actions were approved by God(“John Brown Biography” 7). Some of his efforts were to stop the civil war from happening(“John Brown” 5). John was brave and felt accomplished for what he had achieved in effort to end slavery. John was hung on December 2, 1859(“John Brown” 11). Brown died at the age of the 59 and as an abolitionist. During the aftermath of the death of John Brown, fellow abolitionists were inspired by his last speech addressing the world before he took his final breath. John Brown addressed the world with a speech that motivated, inspired, and impacted others in so many ways. The speech was held in Charlestown, Virginia in front of the court and other citizens. Brown claimed he never intended to harm or cause any unnecessary treason(“John Brown” 11). During his speech, there was a significant person in the crowd(“John Brown” 10”). John Wilkes Booth was there that day of the speech and would later be the murderer of president Abraham Lincoln(“John Brown” 11). The death of John Brown had little effect on the country but the South now feared of another slavery insurrection(“John Brown” 5). When the newspapers were published of the Harper’s Ferry raid, most considered it as an accident. However, as the true details surfaced, the South was not pleased with what had happened. This pushed South abolitionists to move forward with even more conviction. In the North’s eyes he was the martyr and in the South, the murderer who deserved what he got. His last speech stated, “In the first place, I deny everything but what I have already admitted, of a design on my part to free Slaves. I intended, certainly, to have made a clean thing of that matter, as I did last winter, when I went into Missouri, and there took Slaves, without the snapping of a gun on either side, moving them through the country, and finally leaving them in Canada. I desired to have done the same thing again, on a much larger scale. That was all I intended. I never did intend murder, or treason, or the destruction of property, or to excite or incite Slaves to rebellion, or to make insurrection.”(“John Brown’s Final Speech, 1859” 7). How were Harriet Tubman and John Brown alike/ not alike?
Harriet Tubman and John Brown had many similarities and differences from their life as an abolitionist, their goals in their lifetime, and their deaths. A difference the two share is Harriet was often called “Moses” because of her presence and courage to free the slaves which are synonymous with John being called “Old Osawatomie Brown for the actions he decided to take during his lifetime(Appleby 534). One thing they have in common is John had two spouses similar to Harriet who also had two spouses(“John Brown Biography” 3). John used the underground railroad as did Harriet during the time when slave hunters and slavery was increasing in America(Appleby 534). Another difference was Harriet was born in Dorchester County, Maryland whereas John was born in Torrington, Connecticut (“John Brown” 2). A distinction between the two is Tubman freed over 300 slaves whereas Brown was known for the raid on Harper’s Ferry(“John Brown” 9). Finally, John was hung on December 8, 1859, opposed to Harriet when she passed away of pneumonia on March 10, 1913(“John Brown’s Final Speech, 1859” 9). Nevertheless John Brown and Harriet Tubman had many similarities and differences including their nicknames, to their participation in the Underground
Railroad. In conclusion John had the determination, courage, and strong beliefs that impacted others to follow. John Brown was an abolitionist, martyr, and a hero of the South. Brown also was known for the attack on Pottawatomie Creek, murderer of the South, and the slaves he attempted to free. Finally John had twenty children to look after and so many things to do before he died. John left a legacy to inspire others and change world one step at a time. “I have only a short time to live, only one death to die, and I will die fighting for this cause. There will be no peace in this land until slavery is done for.” -John Brown
In his work “Escape and Revolt in Black and White,” James M. McPherson discusses the lives of now famous black and white defenders of the black population and how society’s views of these individuals changed over time. The majority of his essay focused on the stories of Harriet Tubman, Harriet Jacobs, and John Brown, each of whom impacted their own immediate surroundings, even if only on a small scale, in an attempt to improve the condition of blacks. He investigates whether these now famous individuals became famous due to their own merits or as another piece of propaganda to support either side of the fight over civil rights. However, this overall point was very unclear and jumbled as he focused too heavily on just his narrative of these
In order to be a hero, one must be courageous. Some people that are heroes are Susan B. Anthony and Harriet Tubman.
Brown had his mind made up to travel on the pathway to Harpers Ferry right when he was born and believed he is the only one that has to lead this battle. His parents were passionate Calvinists who taught their children to view life as an endless fight contrary to evil. The battle of John Brown was on a more personal level where he remembered a memory when he was five years old and his mother whipped him for stealing a vast amount of brass pins. In addition, the battle was somewhat on a political point as well because Brown and his family considered that the sincere had to be spectators against the bad people in America. They assumed that the biggest evil during their time has to be none other than the establishment of slavery. Therefore, the father of John Brown replaced their family residence in northeast Ohio into a stop on the Underground Railroad and made his son into a dedicated abolitionist. Brown’s developing participation in the movement in the 1830s and ’40s made him set his commitment as well as the rising nationwide fight over slavery’s position in a country supposedly devoted to equal opportunity. During this era, abolition...
James Oakes gave a brilliant and unique perspective to a relationship between two well known historical figures of their time. Abraham Lincoln is a well-admired president for the United States because as Americans culture teaches that he was an honest and well-respected man. He heard about a young African American man, who had high aspirations for his life and the blossoming United States. This man’s name was Frederick Douglass. James Oakes demonstrates how both Douglass and Lincoln worked towards the abolishment of slavery and effectively producing better outcomes within antislavery politics.
After suffering the overwhelming ferociousness and inhumanity of being a slave for over two decades, a black man by the name of Fredrick Douglass fled from enslavement and began to make a concerted effort to advance himself as a human being. Combating many obstacles and resisting numerous temptations, Douglass worked assiduously to develop into a knowledgeable gentleman rather than the involuntary alternative of being an unenlightened slave. In doing so, Douglass successfully emerged as one of the Civil War era’s most prominent antislavery orators. From his first major public speech at the age of 23, Douglass became widely renowned as a premier spokesperson for Black slaves and the movement for the abolition of slavery. In one of Douglass’ most distinguished speeches, “The Meaning of July 4th for the Negro,” he uses the intermittent occasion of speaking on behalf of African Americans to a multitude of White Americans to outline arguments against slavery.
Despite each individual having different circumstances in which they experienced regarding the institution of slavery, both were inspired to take part in the abolitionist movement due to the injustices they witnessed. The result is two very compelling and diverse works that attack the institution of slavery and argue against the reasons the pro-slavery individuals use to justify the slavery
From before the country’s conception to the war that divided it and the fallout that abolished it, slavery has been heavily engrained in the American society. From poor white yeoman farmers, to Northern abolitionist, to Southern gentry, and apathetic northerners slavery transformed the way people viewed both their life and liberty. To truly understand the impact that slavery has had on American society one has to look no further than those who have experienced them firsthand. Frederick Douglass, an escaped slave and advocate for the abolitionist, is on such person. Douglass was a living contradiction to American society during his time. He was an African-American man, self-taught, knowledgeable, well-spoken, and a robust writer. Douglass displayed a level of skill that few of his people at the time could acquire. With his autobiography, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass: An American Slave Written by Himself, Douglass captivated the people of his time with his firsthand accounts into the horror and brutality that is the institution of slavery.
Consequently, Harriet Tubman was born a slave into a slave family. As a slave, at five years old, Tubman was "rented" to families where she was put to work winding yarn, checking animal traps, cleaning the houses and nursing children among many more laborious tasks. When she was older, she decided she prefered to work outside of the house as opposed to laboring inside the house with domestic chores. As a teenager, she would upset her owners and often was reprimanded and sent home because of her rebellious attitude. Later on in Tubman’s life, she married a free man and also found out that her mother was freed by her owner, but her mother was never informed of her freedom. This directly affected Tubman because her mother’s freedom also meant that Tubman was b...
I began the research for this paper looking to write about Frederick Douglass’ drive to start his abolitionist paper The North Star. What I then found in my research was the writings of a man I had never before heard of, Martin R. Delaney. Delaney and Douglass were co-editors of the paper for its first four years, therefore partners in the abolitionist battle. Yet I found that despite this partnership these men actually held many differing opinions that ultimately drove them apart.
Boyer, Richard O. The Legend of John Brown: A Biography and a History. New York, NY: Knopf, 1973. Print.
Both Fredrick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs write narratives about their time being slaves. The narratives show dehumanization through physical and emotional abuse, along with sexual abuse supported with textual evidence. However, Jacobs states "slavery is bad for men, but is for more terrible for women", which I concur with.
Carter G. Woodson: Negro Orators ansd Their Orations (New York, NY, 1925) and The Mind of the Negro (Washington, DC., 1926).
This excellent biography fluently tells the life story of Douglass; one of the 19th centuries's most famous writers and speakers on abolitionist and human rights causes. It traces his life from his birth as a slave in Maryland, through his self-education, escape to freedom, and subsequent lionization as a renowned orator in England and the United States. Fascinating, too, are accounts of the era's politics, such as the racist views held by some abolitionist leaders and the ways in which many policies made in post-Civil War times have worked to the detriment of today's civil rights movement. The chapter on Frederick Douglass and John Brown is, in itself, interesting enough to commend this powerful biography. The seldom-seen photographs, the careful chapter notes, documentation, and acknowledgements will encourage anybody to keep on learning about Frederick Douglass.
Egerton, Douglas R. Death or Liberty: African Americans and Revolutionary America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Numerous are mindful of the considerable deed that Harriet Tubman executed to free slaves in the south. Then again, individuals are still left considerably unaware about in which the way they were safeguarded and how she triumphed each and every deterrent while placing her life at risk of being captured. She is deserving of the great honor she has garnered by todays general society and you will find out her in the biography. The title of this biography is “Harriet Tubman, the Road to Freedom.” The author of this piece is Catherine Clinton. ”Harriet Tubman, the road to Freedom” is a charming, instructive, and captivating book that history appreciates and is a memoir than readers will cherish. The Target audience of the biography is any readers