Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
College essays on compare and contrast
Comparative essay
College essays on compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Even just at first glance, many apparent similarities exist between William Shakespeare's hamlet and john Milton's paradise lost, after all, they were both written around the same time, and Milton was highly influenced by Shakespeare's work. However, the similarities are not just in style. Many people don’t realize that huge parallels between the characters exist in both stories. One of the most striking examples are the incredible similarities between Hamlet and Satan. On the surface, characters might seem different, after all, while both protagonists, one is seen as a hero, while the other an anti-hero, and Satan actions seem uncalled for and out of pure evil while Hamlet might seem like he is on a noble quest for revenge. But the fact …show more content…
is that, in Paradise Lost and Hamlet, both of the main protagonists experience a conflict with the ruling authority, are sent away because of it, and are driven by revenge for something they have lost. In this essay, we will take a look at several examples, that demonstrate each of these concepts for each of the characters. One of the first similarities between Hamlet and Satan is that they share similar stories that eventually lead to their fall, which both involve them challenging the current ruling authority in a way that gets them both in trouble. In hamlet's case, he makes extreme accusations at both his mother Gertrude, and his uncle Claudius after having found out about his father’s murder. An example of this can be seen in this quote: “HAMLET: Madam, how like you this play? GERTRUDE: The lady protests too much, methinks. HAMLET: Oh, but she’ll keep her word.” (III.ii.219) in this scene hamlet is putting on his play in which he indirectly insults his mom. When Gertrude protests, Hamlet takes a jab at her by saying that the woman in the play will keep her word, implying that the woman in the play is more loyal than her. In satan’s case, he starts a war with god because he resents god’s control and wants him and the other angels to be equal to god, and gathers supporters and rebels. This can be seen in the passage: “If he opposed, and, with ambitious aim Against the throne and monarchy of God, Raised impious war in Heaven and battle proud” (I.41)” when Milton talks about his attempt to overthrow god by starting a war in heaven. After angering the people in charge, both Hamlet and Satan face disownment and punishment which leads both of them to be sent away, leading to their fall. Once again this idea varies slightly for each character. In Hamlet’s case, his play both enraged and worried Claudius and his mom a great deal, which eventually leads to them meeting to talk about his state after he killed Polonius. In the quote: “CLAUDIUS: O Gertrude, come away! The sun no sooner shall the mountains touch, But we will ship him hence: and this vile deed We must, with all our majesty and skill, Both countenance and excuse.” (IV.i.29) we learn that Claudius decides to send Hamlet off to England to be tried for his crimes, Gertrude agrees, not knowing that Claudius plans to order his execution when he arrives there, which can be seen as his “fall”. In the case of Satan, he ends up losing to God (because he is God) and as punishment is cast down to hell along with his followers for their actions. In the quote: “With vain attempt. Him the Almighty Power Hurled headlong flaming from the ethereal sky, With hideous ruin and combustion, down To bottomless perdition, there to dwell In adamantine chains and penal fire” (I.48) we see that Satan ended up losing an unwinnable battle and was cast down to hell to face punishment for his actions. The last main similarity between the two characters are their motivations after the fall, in both cases, they don’t change their mind about their actions and seek revenge for what has happened to them both before and after the fall.
In the case of Hamlet, he returns from England having evaded execution by swapping the letters and having Rosencrantz and Guildenstern killed instead. He returns to Denmark only to find that Ophelia has died which only makes him angrier. He then is eventually challenged to a duel by Polonius's son who has come for revenge, and who together with Claudius conspire to poison Laertes sword and a cup from hamlet to drink from, but instead Gertrude drinks from it and dies. In the end, Hamlet is poisoned but also poisons Laertes, who tells him about the poison cup and sword. And in the passage: “HAMLET: Here, thou incestuous, murderous, damnèd Dane, Drink off this potion. Is thy union here? Follow my mother.” (V.ii.320) we learn than Hamlet successfully kills Claudius before dying, by stabbing him and forcing him to drink down the poison cup. In satan’s case, he and the other fallen angels discover Paradise, and Satan became furiously jealous when he sees eve and Adam in the garden. Driven by jealousy and revenge for being cast out of heaven, Satan enters the garden of Eden and takes the form of a snake. As seen in this passage: “So saying, her rash hand in evil hour Forth reaching to the Fruit, she pluck'd, she eat: Earth felt the wound, and
Nature from her seat Sighing through all her Works gave signs of woe,”(IX.780) we see that satan succeeds in this effort and tempts eve into eating from the tree of knowledge leading to the fall of man. Despite the amazing parallels between the two characters, Hamlet and Satan differ in important ways, particularly in their outcome. In the end, Hamlet returns from his fall and successfully exacts his revenge before dying. On the other hand, while satan is successful in his quest for Adam and Eve to fall, they eventually are forgiven and get to rejoin god in heaven after they die, while satan is doomed to stay in hell. After realizing this, Satan ends up sadder than before. Still, clear similarities are present between the two, and it demonstrates that two seemingly different characters can have a lot in common.
Great minds think alike, but fools seldom differ. Yes, that is the unknown truth. Are you wise or are you foolish? The thing is, you never know until it’s too late. In Hamlet, a very popular play written by William Shakespeare, the main character, Hamlet, loses his father. His father had been murdered by his uncle so that he could have the throne to himself and rule over his brother’s land. Throughout the play, Hamlet tries to avenge his father, resulting in the death of his uncle, mother, lover, lover’s father, and lover’s brother, as well as Hamlet, himself. In The Book Thief, the plot of this historic fiction novel is different. It takes place in a fictional town in Germany during World War II. It is about a thief. A book thief to be exact.
A Comparison of the Character Hamlet, of Shakespeare's Hamlet, and McMurphy of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest
No story is entirely original. Authors, playwrights, and songwriters all pick and choose elements from stories regardless of whether they intend to or not. Some stories mirror those of the past more similarly than others while adding a fresh, new twist. The Disney movie The Lion King contains many similarities to Shakespeare's play Hamlet, some of which are more obvious than others. Similarities in the character complexes of the three hyenas and Polonius's family, betrayal from Scar and Claudius, and the kingdoms deterioration and resolution are a few examples of the likenesses of the movie and play.
The Kite Runner by Khalid Hosseini and William Shakespeare’s Hamlet have demonstrated how the protagonists’ action of concealing and revealing their true selves impacts themselves and the surrounding. Amir’s escaping from the alley in the year of 1975 and Hamlet’s supernatural conversation with the ghost respectively trigger the aggressive plot development in the stories. Second, Amir’s desperation for paternal love and Hamlet’s grief for the death of Old Hamlet cause them to act differently and lead to a life dilemma. Nevertheless, Amir’s redemption saves him from further concealing the sorrow of betraying Hassan, whereas Hamlet’s life, without forgiveness, forebodes the remarkable tragedy, death.
The theme of the 'heroic' in John Milton's Paradise Lost is one that has often been the focus of critical debate, namely in the debate surrounding which character is the 'true' hero of the poem. Most critics of the subject have, however, noted that the difficultly in defining the 'hero' of Milton's work is mainly due to our “vague understanding of what constitutes heroism”1 and the fact that “the term itself is equivocal”2. The 'vague' terming of what heroism can be defined as it what draws critics to disagree with one another over the nature of heroism, as Charles Martindale points out that there are 'different models of heroic', many of which Milton employs in his epic poem. To incorporate these different 'models' of the heroic into his poem, Milton relates various elements of these models to his characters, allowing him to 'test' and 'revalidate' certain ideas and images of the heroic. For the most part, the models of the heroic fit broadly into two camps, which leads critics like John Steadman to identify the “conflict between secular and divine criteria of the heroic”3. Furthermore, within these two main models of heroism critics mostly attempt to define the characters of Satan, Adam and the Son of God, depending on their characteristics throughout the poem.
The plot begins when Denmark’s king, Hamlet Sr., is abruptly found dead. Hamlet, the king’s son, ventured home from school in Germany to attend his father’s funeral. Shortly after, Hamlet’s mother, Queen Gertrude, remarries to the dead king’s brother, Claudius. Hamlet is told by his father’s ghost that he was murdered by Claudius in order to take the throne. The rest of the play tells Hamlet’s plot to avenge his father. Throughout Hamlet, the serpent is the most prominent archetype displayed by Shakespeare. Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle, is the character representing the serpent. The most obvious connection between the serpent and Claudius is told by the ghost of Hamlet Sr., “Now Hamlet hear,/ ‘Tis given out that, sleeping in my orchard,/ A serpent stung me, So the whole ear of Denmark/ Is forged by a process of my death/ Rankly abused. But know, thou noble youth,/ The serpent that did sting thy father’s life/ Now wears his crown” (Shakespeare I.v.34-40). This imagery Shakespeare shows takes place in the Garden of Eden where the betrayal of humanity happened. But instead of the serpent betraying Eve, this scene shows how Claudius (the serpent) betrayed his own brother for the throne. This is an uncanny resemblance of the same serpent from the Garden of Eden. Later in the tragedy, Hamlet accidently kills the father of a character named Laertes’s. Laertes attempts to find out who committed this murder. Since Claudius wanted Hamlet dead, he saw this as a perfect opportunity. Claudius wanted Hamlet dead because he was a threat to Claudius’s position on the throne in many ways. King Claudius wanted to use Laertes as a pawn to kill Hamlet, so he did not have to. Claudius kept tempting Laertes to kill him, using his own guilt against him, “Laertes, was your father dear to you?/ Or are you like a painting of a sorrow,/ A face without a heart” (Shakespeare
Many arguments have been made that Dante’s Inferno glimmers through here and there in Milton’s Paradise Lost. While at first glance the two poems seem quite drastically different in their portrayal of Hell, but scholars have made arguments that influence from Dante shines through Milton’s work as well as arguments refuting these claims. All of these arguments have their own merit and while there are instances where a Dantean influence can be seen throughout Paradise Lost, Milton’s progression of evil and Satan are quite different from Dante. Dante’s influence on Milton is noted by many scholars and is very apparent in several instances throughout Paradise Lost, however, Milton shows a progression of evil through his own vision of Satan and creates a Hell that is less meticulously constructed than Dante’s and more open to interpretation.
In Hamlet by William Shakespeare, the importance of characters Laertes and Fortinbras have been an issue that's discussed and analyzed by many literary critics. Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras are parallel characters in the play. Laertes and Fortinbras are often use by Shakespeare to compare the actions and emotions of Hamlet throughout the play. "They are also important in Hamlet as they are imperative to the plot of the play and the final resolution" (Nardo, 88). Shakespeare placed these three men: Hamlet, Laertes and Fortinbras into similar circumstances, which is, to avenge for their fathers' deaths. The main difference between the three is the way that each of them comes to grief of their fathers' deaths and the way they planned their vengeance.
It’s an ultimate tragedy in which Hamlet and Laertes never took advantage of their similarities to combine their skills and rule the monarchial kingdom together. Despite their differences, they both were images of each other from the very start as their families displayed similar characteristics. They triggered the same intensity of emotions after learning of their fathers and have the same motives steering them for vengeance. Moreover, their love for Ophelia remained unconditional, despite the decision she made. Although they both couldn’t be there when she was suffering, Hamlet and Laertes fought with each other to prove the amount of love they had towards her. Getting closer to the resolution, the duel between the two of them is where they
There have been many different interpretations of John Milton's epic, Paradise Lost. Milton's purpose in writing the epic was to explain the biblical story of Adam and Eve. Although the epic is similar to the Bible story in many ways, Milton's character structure differs from that of the Bible's version. Through-out the epic Milton describes the characters in the way he believes they are. In book II of Paradise Lost, Milton portrays Satan as a rebel who exhibits certain heroic qualities, but who turns out not to be a hero.
Different adaptations of William Shakespeare’s works have taken various forms. Through the creative license that artists, directors, and actors take, diverse incarnations of his classic works continue to arise. Gregory Doran’s Hamlet and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet bring William Shakespeare’s work by the same title to the screen. These two film adaptations take different approaches in presenting the turmoil of Hamlet. From the diverging takes on atmosphere to the characterization of the characters themselves, the many possible readings of Hamlet create the ability for the modification of the presentation and the meaning of the play itself. Doran presents David Tenant as Hamlet in a dark, eerie, and minimal setting; his direction highlighting the
Michael Almereyda’s movie adaptation of Shakespeare’s Hamlet brings about a new perspective through its performance. The movie adaptation, Hamlet (2000), retells the original play in a modernized setting, bringing out various different elements of characters, which highlights a new reading of these characters as individuals, and a newfangled reading of the play as well. Throughout the movie, Ophelia and Gertrude, the woman-leads, are advanced in a progressive manner compared to the original play. In particular, Gertrude from Hamlet (2000) is noticeably altered from Hamlet, the play. This new interpretation of Gertrude and the play created by the movie adaptation advances the position of Gertrude as a woman, as well as motifs of incest, misogyny,
The question of whether Satan is the hero or the villain of John Milton’s Paradise Lost has been largely debated by scholars over the centuries. The ones who believe Satan is the villain of the epic, more commonly known as the Anti-Satanists, tend to argue that Satan is too foolish to be considered a hero, as his “hostility to Almighty power” is ultimately a futile endeavour (as God’s power is omnipotent) (Carey, 135). C.W. Lewis, also an anti-Satanist, goes as far as to claim that to “admire Satan, then, is to give one’s vote not only for a world of misery, but also for a world of lies and propaganda, of wishful thinking” (Lewis, 203). The ones who claim Satan is the hero of the epic, the Satanists, perceive him as the rebellious angel who rises up and defies God’s monarchy and “the tyranny of Heav’n” (174).They choose to focus on Satan’s “nobler qualities, his loyalty in leadership, fortitude in adversity, unflinching courage and splendid recklessness” (Satan/Promo, 3). While these two positions are both valid, this paper will be focusing on a third position; the individuals who believe that Satan is neither the hero nor the villain of the epic. Helen Gardner addresses this notion, claiming how “Satan is, of course, a character in an epic, and he is no sense the hero of the epic as a whole. But he is a figure of heroic magnitude and heroic energy, and he is developed by Milton with dramatic emphasis and dramatic intensity” (Baker/Helen, 208). Satan is without a doubt the antichrist, or “villain” in the biblical scriptures, however one must take into consideration his alternative and more ambiguous portrayal in Paradise Lost. In this paper, I will analyze Satan’s actions, physical portrayal and speeches in Book I of Paradise Los...
In conclusion, Paradise Lost can be seen through a historically contextual lens that allows us to see the parallels between Milton’s life and experiences during the reign of Charles I, and the predominant themes in his epic poem. Many of the themes in Paradise Lost, from the broader situational occurrences to the behavior of individual character’s and their attitudes toward the situations in which they find themselves can be seen as directly influenced by Milton’s time as a Parliamentarian in 17th century England.
Paradise Lost is one of the finest examples of the epic tradition in all of literature. In composing this extraordinary work, John Milton was, for the most part, following in the manner of epic poets of past centuries: Barbara Lewalski notes that Paradise Lost is an "epic whose closest structural affinities are to Virgil's Aeneid . . . "; she continues, however, to state that we now recognize as well the influence of epic traditions and the presence of epic features other than Virgilian. Among the poem's Homeric elements are its Iliadic subject, the death and woe resulting from an act of disobedience; the portrayal of Satan as an Archillean hero motivated by a sense of injured merit and also as an Odyssean hero of wiles and craft; the description of Satan's perilous Odyssey to find a new homeland; and the battle scenes in heaven. . . . The poem also incorporates a Hesiodic gigantomachy; numerous Ovidian metamorphoses; an Ariostan Paradise of Fools; [and] Spenserian allegorical figures (Sin and Death) . . . . (3)