Similarities Between Free Will In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet

842 Words2 Pages

“Free will carried many a soul to hell, but never a soul to heaven.” - Charles Spurgeon. Charles Spurgeon was a Christian preacher who understood choice. He knew that many people make awful choices, which is why he said free will carried many souls to hell. In Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare, many people let their hate, and anger get the best of them, which lead to them making crummy choices. This ultimately leads to the death of Romeo and Juliet. If people in the play did not make choices out of anger and haste, then Romeo and Juliet would be alive at the end. Free will is most responsible for Romeo and Juliet’s deaths because it allows people to make bad choices through their anger and hate, leading to consequences. Shakespeare demonstrates this through his use of foil.

Hate leads to making unacceptable choices because people do not think about what they are doing. Romeo attends the Capulet's party, where he first sees Juliet. While he was there Tybalt spots him, This moment leads to one of Shakespeare's use of a foil. The foil shows the contrast between Romeo and Tybalt. The clear contrast between the two is shown when they say:
Did my heart love till now? Forswear it, sight!-
For I ne’er saw true beauty till …show more content…

The word “will” shows it is Capulet's choice to respect Romeo and let him be at the party. The word ‘patient’ connotes peace because when people are patient, they think about the possibilities of their actions and realize getting angry would not help the situation. This connects back to the topic sentence because Capulet knew that engaging with Romeo is a terrible idea and requested Tybalt to not make a choice with his anger. This helped the situation because no one ruined the party clearly showing that people must stop others from making lousy decisions through their

Open Document