An evil lives, buried deeply or just below the surface, within us all, just waiting to emerge. In the books Frankenstein and Macbeth, the two main characters commence and conclude the story as two comprehensively disparate people, entirely transformed by their actions and encompassing environments. Ignorance and knowledge, two recurring themes in the book Frankenstein and the play Macbeth, are polar opposites, yet work effortlessly together when comparing and contrasting the two readings. The epitome of their downfall throughout the storylines, both characters suffer from either an abundance, or lack thereof, of knowledge. Both characters are monstrous in their own ways, while at the same time being far from similar in the respects of their …show more content…
reactions and responses to the acquirement of both power and knowledge. In both stories, the main characters’ hunger for both power and acceptance shades their moral senses and reasonable sanity. In the beginning of the play, Macbeth was nothing but an innocent, noble, and trustworthy character. After reaping specific knowledge of his future, his moral sense of value slowly began to deteriorate.
Immediately, his desire for his prophecy to come true clouded his sense of what is right. There was; however, a moment in which he no longer wanted to proceed with his murderous actions; when he knew that his intentions weren't right. He wished to, “proceed no further in this business. [The king] hath honored him of late, and he had bought golden opinions from all sorts of people, which would be worn now in their newest gloss, not cast aside so soon” (1.7). He realizes that if he went through with his intentions of murdering the king, his connections and relationships with valuable people, and their trustworthy opinions of him would be annihilated. Ambition was his fatal flaw, being that he craved power, and wouldn't stop until he climbed to the top. He, “[has] no spur to prick the sides of his intent, but only vaulting ambition, which o'erleaps itself and falls on th’ other” (1.7). He admits that ambition leads to a life of destruction, revealing that he is fully aware of just how dangerous it can be. Similarly, Frankenstein began the story as a naive, wide-eyed character, who'd freshly begun his life alone, in the real world. His thirst for assimilating knowledge, and passion for learning, led him to,
for 2 years, manually construct a living creature. In a way, ambition was also his fatal flaw, but primarily, it was ignorance. Frankenstein had put little to no thought into what would happen after this monster was created; his goal was solely to create it. It's clear that he started out as an incredibly naive, ignorant, and irresponsible person, which caused the deterioration of his character. When the monster, to his surprise, actually woke up, Victor “escaped and ran downstairs. [He] took refuge in the courtyard belonging to the house I which he inhabited, where he remained during the rest of the night, walking up and down in the greatest agitation, listening attentively, catching and fearing each sound as if it were to announce the approach of the demoniacal corpse to which I had so miserably given life” (46). Immediately following the awakening of this creature, Frankenstein runs away, and takes cover, hiding from it; clearly not knowing what to expect having given it no thought. When the monster first committed the unthinkable, murdering Victor's younger brother and framing an innocent citizen, he didn't know how to think or act. He knew it was his creation that had executed this horrifying crime, yet he also knew that he couldn't tell this to anyone. He believed that nobody would believe him, or they would think of him as crazy. He believed that he, “Not in deed, but in effect, was the true murderer. Elizabeth read [his] anguish in his countenance, and kindly taking my hand, said, ‘My dearest friend, you must calm yourself. These events have affected me, God knows how deeply; but I am not so wretched as you are. There is an expression of despair, and sometimes of revenge, in your countenance that makes me tremble. Dear Victor, banish these dark passions. Remember the friends around you, who centre all their hopes in you. Have we lost the power of rendering you happy? Ah! While we love, while we are true to each other, here in this land of peace and beauty, your native country, we may reap every tranquil blessing--what can disturb our peace?’” (67). Victor is extremely guilty as he admits that he really is the true murderer. Although he didn't commit the crime, he created, and abandoned, the being that did. He realizes that an innocent civilian is going to die because of his actions, just like his brother already did. Elizabeth writes him a letter expressing her concerns about his recent behavior. She worries that he isn't well, and attempts to give him strength through this difficult time of grief. Little does she know, his brothers death isn't the only thing Victor is sick about. This message from Elizabeth, though awfully encouraging and empowering, is, in actuality, extremely regretful and remorseful. Victor wishes that he could simply focus on grieving his brothers death, and not have to worry about anything else. In this way, both characters were ambitious, and ignorant, therefore causing their own downfall throughout the storylines. Although the two characters have numerous similarities, Frankenstein, throughout the story, learns and gains knowledge from his mistakes, while Macbeth, instead, loses sense of himself and what is right. In the beginning, Macbeth has doubts about going through with his murderous plans, but eventually ignores his apprehensions. He completely transforms into a dishonorable, inhuman, and monstrous character almost immediately after that. He starts to find his best friend since childhood, Banquo, a threat to his power, and sends to have him murdered. He views Banquo from “such bloody distance that every minute of his being thrusts against my near’st of life... (To leave no rubs nor botches in the work) Fleance, his son, that keeps him company, whose a sense is no less material to me than of his father’s, must embrace the fate of that dark hour... It is concluded. Banquo, thy soul’s flight, if it find Heaven, must find it out tonight” (3.5). The thought of Macbeth actually murdering his best friend, who's been there with him through it all, is unfathomable. There is; however, the slightest trace of his old self in this action, because he sends people to do it for him; he couldn't stand the thought of murdering his best friend with his own hands. Shortly after the murder, Macbeth really begins to lose his mind. Referring to the angry dead, “It will have blood, they say. Blood will have blood. Stones have been known to move, and trees to speak. Augurs and understood relations have by magot pies and choughs and rooks brought forth the secret’st man of blood. —What is the night?” He states (3.4). The unknown of what Banquo's ghost is capable of is terrifying to Macbeth, since he's heard so many stories of the dead getting revenge. While Macbeth continues to regress throughout the play, Frankenstein, conversely, seems to rise above his mistakes. Although he was repressed by ignorance and irresponsibility, he learns from his mistakes, and attempts to better himself and those around him, rather than giving up completely, and continue to fall into despair. He advises the reader to, “learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspired to become greater than his nature will allow” (2). Frankenstein admits that he wishes he'd never had the knowledge to create something that nature doesn't allow. He's saying that the more knowledge one has, the more dangerous they become. This is a moment of realization and maturity for Victor, when he can admit to his faults, and even find the reason behind them. Later in the story, when the monster insists that, “[Frankenstein] must create a female for him with whom he can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being. This you alone can do; and I demand it of you as a right which you must not refuse to concede.” (99), Frankenstein strongly refuses this demand. He actually takes into account what happened the first time he created something out of his reach, and weighs the pros and cons of what could happen. There is so much unknown about this creature, and its capabilities, and because of this, Victor forbears the creation of another monster. This shows so much responsibility, and such growth, maturity, and depth in this character compared to how he began. In both the book, Frankenstein, and the play, Macbeth, each character exhibits immense development throughout the plot, whether that be positive or negative. Macbeth begins as a dignified and benevolent individual, and quickly deteriorates as the story goes on, while on the other hand, Victor opens the story as a naive and ignorant individual, but grows and gains knowledge throughout the plot. The two characters learn an abundance about themselves, their morals and values, and their response to certain situations. The two readings show a great deal of both similarities and differences, even though at first glance, the characters may seem completely opposite.
The quote, “Man is not truly one, but truly two.” can be analyzed from a behaviorally or mentally aspect. Physically, man is one, but if you delve deeper into the man, he can be separated into two parts which creates a whole man. In the play Macbeth and in the novel Lord of the Flies, some of the characters can be split into two conflicting parts. The characters are neither entirely good or entirely bad. In both the novel and the play, something happens to the characters that made them split into an evil side, thus creating two men.
Although humans have the tendency to set idealistic goals to better future generations, often the results can prove disastrous, even deadly. The tale of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, focuses on the outcome of one man's idealistic motives and desires of dabbling with nature, which result in the creation of horrific creature. Victor Frankenstein was not doomed to failure from his initial desire to overstep the natural bounds of human knowledge. Rather, it was his poor parenting of his progeny that lead to his creation's thirst for the vindication of his unjust life. In his idealism, Victor is blinded, and so the creation accuses him for delivering him into a world where he could not ever be entirely received by the people who inhabit it. Not only failing to foresee his faulty idealism, nearing the end of the tale, he embarks upon a final journey, consciously choosing to pursue his creation in vengeance, while admitting he himself that it may result in his own doom. The creation of an unloved being and the quest for the elixir of life holds Victor Frankenstein more accountable for his own death than the creation himself.
Compare the ways in which William Shakespeare and Robert Louis Stevenson present change in the main protagonist in Macbeth and The strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.
How can people’s personal flaws lead to their own destruction? In William Shakespeare's King Lear and Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the main characters, Lear and Frankenstein, both as tragic heroes, fall as a result of their own careless actions. Lear and Frankenstein had to die in order to come to epiphanies about their situations and the impact that their own actions have on their lives. Shakespeare and Shelley communicate that one must face a downfall in order to realize his own flaws and the truths of his reality.
After Frankenstein discovered the source of human life, he became wholly absorbed in his experimental creation of a human being. Victor's unlimited ambition, his desire to succeed in his efforts to create life, led him to find devastation and misery. "...now that I have finished, the beauty of the dream had vanished..." (Shelley 51). Victor's ambition blinded him to see the real dangers of his project. This is because ambition is like a madness, which blinds one self to see the dangers of his actions. The monster after realizing what a horror he was demanded that victor create him a partner. "I now also began to collect the materials necessary for my new creation, and this was like torture..." (Shelley 169). Victor's raw ambition, his search for glory, has left him. His eyes have been opened to see his horrible actions, and what have and could become of his creations. As a result, Victor has realized that he is creating a monster, which could lead to the downfall of mankind. His choice is simple, save his own life or save man.
A conversation between Macbeth and Beowulf would be one with great disagreements and arguments due to the fact that both portrayed the same traits in distinct ways. Both men have two different ideals and approaches to certain situations. One of the common themes between both men would be of personal growth. They would disagree on this because both of the characters’ intents are different. Also, because personal growth comes through helping others progress as well. For example, Beowulf would speak about how he grew through helping and protecting others. Beowulf, a mighty human, decides to fight a dragon that threatens his people at the expense of his death. His only wish is to only provide riches for his people, but nothing for himself. On
There were many scenes in the story which reflect how Frankenstein had no guidance in learning how to interact in the real world. He did not know right from wrong and did several horrible things without completely knowing any better. For example, Viktor says “Could he be the murderer of my brother? No sooner did the idea cross my imagination, than I became convinced of its truth; my teeth shattered, and I was forced to lean against the tree for support.” Viktor is overwhelmed with the thought
Ambition can consume leaders, nonetheless some leaders can handle the pressure that comes with having to lead individuals like Abraham Lincoln. However some leaders like Adolf Hitler and Macbeth allowed their ambition to get the best of them and cause harm. Hitler allowed his ambition to drive him to make catastrophic decisions such as trying to conquer other (stronger) countries, make dangerous weapons, torturer, and kill millions of innocent people. Whereas Macbeth allowed his ambition to kill the people that loved and supported him the most in order to gain control of the kingdom. Both Macbeth and Hitler illustrate leadership, but turned mad in order to consume more power.
Evil is a popular theme in many novels and plays, and there are many factors that contribute to characters becoming evil. Factors such as no interaction with people and the way someone is treated can turn a person to become evil and commit bad acts. The person may start out as a selfless person with good morals, but eventually he will turn evil as a result of outside factors. Some factors might be isolation, the way he is treated by others, and motives. A person’s selfish needs often consume him and he wants nothing but to benefit himself. He will do anything to get what he wants and will eventually commit so many bad acts that he will turn purely evil. In the play Macbeth by Shakespeare and the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the characters
American musician Jimmy Dean once stated, “I can't change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination” (values.com). The tenacity described by this quotation is shared by Macbeth from The Tragedy of Macbeth, Hamlet from The Tragedy of Hamlet: Prince of Denmark, and Alice from Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Each of these beloved characters are placed in unfavorable circumstances, yet they manage to pursue their own desires despite the will of those around them. In addition, unlike Hamlet and Macbeth, Alice manages to minimize her path of destruction. As demonstrated by Lewis Carrol’s Alice Liddell, the characteristics William Shakespeare’s tragic heroes transcend time and morph to create new modern heroes.
I took their word for all that they averred, and I became their disciple” (21). Frankenstein embodies the movement in science to understand everything, and that is not necessarily a good thing (Storment 2). Frankenstein only understands that this train of thought is bad when he reaches the pinnacle of knowledge and produces the creature. The fruits of Frankenstein’s labor end up costing him the lives of his friends and family, as well as his own sanity. The feeling of guilt thrives in Frankenstein because he knows his work was the direct cause of the chaos in his life.
Victor Frankenstein is not the only person who has had an ambition. People who are not scientist also have ambitions. Some ambitions could be to become very rich, be elected into office, enter a certain university, etc. These ambitions are very difficult to attain. But if people really want to meet their goal, they will not stop until this is meet. For example, a politician who wants to be elected will do anything on his power to get voters to vote for him/her. This may require for him/her to spend a lot of money on the campaign. Another example is a student who wants to enter a certain university. This student will try to me...
Throughout life,many people make impulse decisions in their lives such as lashing out at loved ones or spending money on the first thing in their sights that appease them without looking at the number in their bank account.Normally,people can’t go back on these decisions after receiving the horrific consequences such as divorces or becoming bankrupt.These actions can be caused by greed or lust which are two out of the seven deadly sins that burden most humans.Mary Shelley shows this with the use of a character who makes a decision he can never go back on,regardless of the consequences he will have to take on. Many critics have explored the psychoanalytical aspect of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. The thought process behind the decisions and
The characters Macbeth and Satan both share a number of qualities with each other. Both portray the corrupting influence of power, or the want of it. Both possess inordinate ambitions. Despite these similarities, however, the disparities between the two of them, in the conception of their evil, are apparent.
In the play Othello and the play Macbeth, Shakespeare uses the main characters in both plays as warriors. Both characters in each of their plays, had constant outside voices seeping into their minds which ultimately contributed to the fate of both Othello and Macbeth. The witches in the play Macbeth had more of an effect of Macbeth’s actions then Iago had on Othello’s actions in the play Othello. Each character had a lot of pressure on them throughout the play however the witches influence on Macbeth resulted in more destruction than Iago’s influence on Othello.