Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical perspective of Victor Frankenstein
Victor Frankenstein as an outsider
Essays on frankenstein the creature and victors relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical perspective of Victor Frankenstein
“Suspicion always haunts the guilty mind.” (William Shakespeare). Humans often believe that by keeping things hidden from the world it will offer a much more safer life. However, they are not aware of the consequences that will soon later on haunt them in their minds. Frankenstein by Mary Shelly and the play A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen both clearly demonstrate how the characters of Nora Helmer, Victor Frankenstein, Nils Krogstad, and the creature show an immense part of how ones’ mind can become haunted due to it’s hidden secrets to the world. Nora Helmer is a housewife who display’s to be perfect to the outside world however; as the doors shut one is able to see the problems and hidden secrets living within her home. Victor Frankenstein …show more content…
Krogstad is a man who has bad luck following him everywhere he goes and does not seem to get anything he wishes for. Due to his past mistake’s and wrong doings Krogstad loses everyone’s respect in his society and is never given the chance to explain. He then becomes cruel when he loses everything important in life. He shows this as he speaks to his long lost lover Mrs. Linde and is finally able to express how he truly feels. “When I lost you, it was as if all the solid ground dissolved from under my feet. Look at me; I’m a half-drowned man now, hanging onto a wreck.” (Ibsen, 95). Nils Krogstad never desired to become cruel. He was not always so cold hearted but when people did not want to open their arms for him he had no choice but to shrivel up into a ball and drowned in misery. Everything was corrupt in life and no matter how many times he tried to get back up he was forced back down. He lusted for something good in his life and blackmailing Nora was the only way. Krogstad being hidden from everyone caused his mind to fill with cold and haunted thoughts. This connects to the deadly sin anger because anger is the driven emotion that Krogstad can only feel when he is blackmailing Nora. Furthermore, Krogstad mind was constantly filled with secrets because he did not have anyone who cared enough to listen and sometimes that is all one needs to become good
Nora Helmer was a delicate character and she relied on Torvald for her identity. This dependence that she had kept her from having her own personality. Yet when it is discovered that Nora only plays the part of the good typical housewife who stays at home to please her husband, it is then understandable that she is living not for herself but to please others. From early childhood Nora has always held the opinions of either her father or Torvald, hoping to please them. This mentality makes her act infantile, showing that she has no ambitions of her own. Because she had been pampered all of her life, first by her father and now by Torvald, Nora would only have to make a cute animal sound to get what she wanted from Torvald, “If your little squirrel were to ask you for something very, very, prettily” (Ibsen 34) she said.
...d children. The final mask of Krogstad that is seen is that of love and caring. In the end Kristine goes back to Krogstad stating that she always loved him and only left him because “I had a helpless mother and two small brothers. We couldn’t wait for you” (Ibsen, 1225). In the end it is Krogstad who has changed for the better, not Nora or Helmer. It is the very man that Torvald so easily condemned for his past mistakes.
Krogstad is different from Torvald because he is not as well off economically and socially and this leads him to try an extremer form of manipulation. Krogstad is desperate to keep his job at the bank and tries to get Nora to secure the job with her husband through blackmail. Since he was once found to be forging documents, his reputation has been flaky, so in order to regain his reputation for his sons: "For their sake I must win back as much respect as I can in the town" (22), he needs to keep his job at the bank.
Nora is the pampered wife of an aspiring bank manager Torvald Halmer. In a desperate attempt to saves her husband's life Nora once asked for a loan so she and her family could move somewhere where her husband could recover from his sickness. Giving the circumstances she, as a woman of that period, by herself and behind her husband forged her dad signature to receive the loan. Now, Nora's lender (Mr. Krogstad), despite her paying punctually, uses that fault as a fraud to pressure her so she could help him to keep his job in the Bank where her husband is going to be the manager. Nora finds out that Torvald would fire Mr. Krogstad at any cost. At learning this, Nora trembles for she knows Mr. Krogstad will tell everything to Torvald. She remains confident; however that Torvald will stand by her no matter what outcome. His reaction though is not what she expected and therefore here is when she realizes that she "must stand quite alone" and leaves her husband.
This leads Nora into a frenzy of techniques to convince her husband into not firing Krogstad, however; Nora had been the one who recommended Mrs Linde to work for Helmer, who is now the one replacing Krogstad. After many attempts, Nora is unable to convince Helmer to keep Krogstad. The last day she seems hopeless and willing to assume the consequences, she has a final opportunity at getting away with it; by finding out Mrs Linde and Krogstad have unsolved romantic affairs and that he is deeply in love with her. This new development convinces Krogstad to be with Mrs linde, but unfortunately the previous letter telling everything about the debt and forgery was already in Helmer’s mail. When the night comes for Helmer to read his mail, he finds out about the note and Nora’s mistakes, he is quick to think of a way to come up clean, while at the same time dishonoring Nora for her actions. “ Oh, what an awful awakening! In all these eight years-she who was my pride and joy-a hypocrite, a liar-worse, worse-a criminal” (Doll Act 3). Nora’s attitude at this point is guilt and shame. Soon after another letter is received. Krogstad sends the note, implicitly liberating them from all guilt and also attaches a letter apologizing and explaining the events that recently took place in his life,
Although Krostad’s blackmail does not change Nora’s whimsical nature, it opens her eyes to her underappreciated potential. “I have been performing tricks for you, Torvald,” (Find a different quote perhaps?) she exclaims in her confrontation with Torvald. She realizes that she has been putting on a facade for him throughout their marriage. Acting like someone she is not in order to fill the role that her father, Torvald, and society expected her to have.
The characters of Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll House and Hedda Gabler have problems relating to and surrounding their feelings towards the expectations presented to them by their society. The motivation behind their actions denote a fear of losing their respectability and status in their towns while implying a desire to be free of the expectations on them. The looming punishment of losing reputation and credibility in a community forces the characters in these plays to tiptoe around each other while trying to gain an upper hand and not be exposed in a possible scandal. The character’s actions are driven by a fear of losing respect in the community, being deemed disgraceful by neighbors, and damaging the character they have been building in the eyes
1. What transpires between Krogstad and Mrs. Linde while Nora and Torvald are upstairs at the party? The two realize both their lives are ruined and have nowhere to go so they decide to join together and by doing this Krogstad does not allow Torvald to read the letter. 2.
His appearance in the story proves to be the catalyst forcing Nora to examine how happy she is hiding secrets from her husband for fear that he would not love her if he finds out. Because both are the lone ones in A Doll’s House who see every case about morality situationally, they starkly see how those who do not conform to society’s conventions are greatly ostracized. Krogstad has even experienced this isolation when he is shunned from his work place despite being fairly competent at his tasks. This unfair treatment lingers in Nora’s mind as she struggles with her own worries. To aid her toward the direction of self-honesty, Krogstad and Christine decide that the truth of Nora’s actions must be revealed since they have just finished their talk about their feelings and pasts. Ultimately, Nora realizes that no matter her efforts, she is fake for constantly trying to be someone she is not without finding who she really is. She sees that Torvald treats her horribly like how he treats Krogstad because both committed a similar crime, and she decides that if Torvald acts the same way to her as to a coworker for the sake of appearances, she is like a stranger to him. The two must separate to reflect in order to live a life without deceit, even if it means breaking this perfect doll-house life Nora has meticulously crafted for the past eight
When Krogstad makes his first entrance, the audience senses that he portends evil. Nora “starts” and “trembles” at his voice (Ibsen). Dr. Rank says that Krogstad “suffers from a diseased moral character” (Ibsen). Torvald says that Krogstad has been “persistently poisoning his own children with lies and dissimulation” (Ibsen). It is obvious that Nora and Krogstad have a secret, but uncomfortable, relationship. Nora becomes nervous when she sees him, but pretends that she does not know who he is when speaking to others. Krogstad works at the bank where Torvald has just been appointed as director. Krogstad senses that he will be dismissed when Torvald assumes the supervision of the place. Therefore, he comes to Nora asking her to u...
an example of the individual’s struggle against society” (Mitchell 136). She was punished severely for something that could be considered a petty crime and the crime ultimately led to her and Torvald’s separation and her leaving the house. In addition, “Christine Linde and Nils Krogstad’s subplot ending in marriage happens at the same time as Nora’s break with Torvald.” (Davies 51) The sharp contrast between the two creates conflict within the audience members because Krogstad is being rewarded for blackmail as Nora is being punished for saving her husband’s life.
Lastly, the amount of deception and dishonesty between Nora and Torvald would have broken the marriage even without Krogstad’s extortion plot. Both Nora and Torvald are living in a world of lies, and both of them are not honest with each other and themselves. In the beginning of the play, Torvald and Nora are portrayed to be a perfect couple with a perfect life. Nora is seen returning home after a day of shopping and is greeted lovingly by her husband. Even though they seemed to have had some financial troubles in the past, Torvald just received a new job as a bank manager and everything seemed to be alright, but behind the scenes nothing was alright.
Krogstad wants to advance his position and, “get on in the world,” (2.606-607) by, “working [his] way up step by step,” (2.611). This is yet another character presented by Ibsen that is concerned solely with status and image – both of which can lead to lying and
Krogstad, is a man who works with Torvald in the bank, yet he does not like him because he is not trustworthy and he forces people into doing something that he wants them to do. In addition, Torvald dislikes Krogstad because he is afraid of manipulating his children’s minds. Therefore, Torvald decides to fire Krogstad from the bank. Krogstad hears from co-workers that he is going to be fired from his job. Krogstad does not want to be fired because his reputation in the society is bad because of what he has done in the past.
These two, especially Kristine seem to not live by the roles money outlined. Kristine is a working woman and not just as a house help which was common but in an office, of course, it would be under a man since it women could not earn a pay as high as a man at the time. However, she did keep with the role of children as home as she stated how her life felt empty without someone to take care of. Krogstad was driven by pain and suffering to become as selfish as he did. In the end, they both came together without money which brought the conclusion that they one does not need money to be happy but people who genuinely love them.