A Doll's House Metaphors

1293 Words3 Pages

To recount, it is not only the women that were wronged by society in Ibsen's a Doll's House but also the men. Ibsen portrays money as being the evil dictator of the roles of man and woman in society. Mistreating money and not having money emasculated a man, in society money represented power and a blissful life, for women having money meant power so it was inconceivable for them to earn it bountifully. In general, it controlled the lives of every being. Ibsen meticulously placed metaphors in the play that showed the role of money in society. One of the primary metaphors were in the names Helmer addressed Nora, " Has my little spendthrift been making the money fly again?" ( Act 1 Scene 1). A 'spendthrift' as used in the play meant a gambler, so one who misuses money. The value of money alone enabled society to have demeaning stereotypes of women. Helmer believes Nora is spending money foolishly, this meant she was misusing power, she could not handle it. That feeds into the stereotype of women not being able …show more content…

These two, especially Kristine seem to not live by the roles money outlined. Kristine is a working woman and not just as a house help which was common but in an office, of course, it would be under a man since it women could not earn a pay as high as a man at the time. However, she did keep with the role of children as home as she stated how her life felt empty without someone to take care of. Krogstad was driven by pain and suffering to become as selfish as he did. In the end, they both came together without money which brought the conclusion that they one does not need money to be happy but people who genuinely love them. They even break the rule of the man being the provider seeing as how Kristine would be the one with the job at first. Ibsen uses the two to display how society could get rid of the evil control money has set on

Open Document