A Doll's House Gender Roles

1595 Words4 Pages

In the early days before money was used, people bartered. When things were exchanged, they did not dwell on it. It was simply to get what was needed. With money, people wanted more, which brought the notion of living lavishly: having the biggest house, biggest cars, showing how comfortable their lives were. Soon money took rise as the deciding factor of one's life. In the play, A Doll's House, Henrik Ibsen uses metaphors to portray how money in its reality simplifies gender roles; this sets the standards for the gender stereotypes enforced in the play. Each gender seems to be stuck to one role and could not cross over, which is a simplified way of looking at such a complex thing as society. Females are often seen as the only 'dolls' in the play but deeper analysis would show that money also relates men to dolls. Men were to be the sole breadwinners while women were nurturing in …show more content…

She gave all that up to go be with a man who in return gave her money ( that is how powerful it was). After his death, he could not leave her much estate because society would not allow it, she could not have that much money because that would put her dominant over poor men which was unacceptable at the time. Left with no one else to care for, her life became, " inexpressibly empty," life ceases all happiness when one cannot fulfill their societal roles so she searched for it. She searched for someone to take care of even if it was through work, after all a woman could only work under a man, she could only gain money (which in reality meant a comfortable living) through a man as she stated, " I have no father to give me the money (Act I)." By being nurturing and entertaining towards men, women could then have a purpose as well as happiness which came in the form of

Open Document