Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis dystopian literature
Dystopian literature characteristics
Dystopian fiction essay questions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dystopian literature is often portrayed as fiction or too unrealistic to be realistically considered. Many producers of songs, plays and movies have also created pieces, such as the Blade Runner and The Matrix, and have been some of the best works ever produced. It is a popular genre because of how today’s modern society can relate to one in this category. Our world is becoming more and more like the ones you would read about in your english class or the one that seem too fake to even consider real. These movies and books are thought provoking and paint two types of society. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and 1984 by George Orwell present the reader/viewer with what our society will look like in the future due to technology and classification
of people. In 1984, quotes like “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.” are used to break down the psychological independence of the people living under the rule. This fake history is one way that they control the people along with controlling the past because it will ensure the control of the future. By having control of the way that people think, they have the ability to interpret the past. The people are unable to keep notes or writings of their own past. This is just one example of how, in 1984, George Orwell tries to hypnotize people with propaganda and not much force. The United States as of right now are not using force to change people, but they are using their fair share of propaganda. This is most noticeably true with technology especially with the new cars on the market along with the new phones that come out every six months. Many people in the past have warned about the uprising of technology and this is exactly how Fahrenheit 451 portrays its dystopian society. It is forbidden to read books of any sort but it is found out that knowledge comes with reading. This novel is years in the future by predicting what the present day society is like. We are surrounded by technology every single day that may lead to a world that is like the one in the novel.
In most stories we enjoy, may it be from childhood or something more recent there is many times a theme that shows a clear hero and a clear villain. But ordinarily this is not the case in real life, there are few times that this is quite that simple. There are many sides to each story, and sometimes people turn a blind eye to, or ignore the opposing side’s argument. But if we look at both sides of a situation in the stories we can more clearly understand what is going on, moreover the villains in the book or play would seem more real, instead of a horrible person being evil for no reason, these two people have their own agenda may it be a ruthless vengeance or misplaced trust.
To say this novel is even remotely similar to anything being read in my high school classes would be an outright lie. The philosophical themes of existential dread, nihilism, absurdism and general apathy are unlike those found in any novel. Thus, it is fortunately unlike a great number of books and ripe for comparisons. “Fahrenheit 451” and “Huckleberry Finn” come to mind, as those books have plots centered around active rebellious tendencies and great adventures. In the book “Fahrenheit 451” the protagonist Guy Montag, when presented with great danger, makes an incredible escape in order to pursue his life and his curiosity. In stark contrast to Guy Montag’s exciting escape from his inanimate doom, the narrator (his name is Meursault, left out in some translations) accepts his death sentence as an implication of the inevitable. He does not know whether his is guilty or not of his crime, only that he has been sentenced to the guillotine and that an attempt to prolong his existence is
During the course of the semester, I covered many topics during this class. These topics consist of; The Great Gatsby, The topic of Rationalism, Romanticism/transcendentalism, The crucible, and Fahrenheit 451. In this assignment, I was asked to summarise each topic with a single thing I could use to describe the meaning of the topic. I chose to summarise each topic in terms of a single quote. I chose quotes because of the open-mindedness of quotes. Everyone sees quotes differently, and they have different meanings for everyone. They are often used to express opinions, or public knowledge led to educate and inspire others.
Kofi Annan said, “Knowledge is power. Information is liberating. Education is the premise of progress, in every society, in every family” but not in the society of Fahrenheit 451 or the world we live in today. The two societies are similar in the way that social status is focused on and that many people hide their guilty pleasures due to what others think. A difference between the societies is that thinking is punished for in Fahrenheit 451 while in the world today you're encouraged to think by elders but discouraged by your peers.
The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both great examples of dystopian fiction. A dystopia is a fictional world that takes place in the future that is supposed to be perceived as a perfect society, but it’s actually the opposite. Other things that a dystopian society might display are citizens both living in a dehumanized state and feeling like they’re constantly watched by a higher power. Dystopias are places where society is backwards or unfair, and they are usually are controlled by the government, technology, or a particular religion. The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both in the dystopian fiction genre because the societies within them show the traits of a dystopia. Both of them also have characters that go against the flow of the normal world.
Before World War I, the literary term known as the Utopia emerged. Many people believed that society would be happier if the individual made sacrifices for the “common good”. However, the war changed all of that. Society began to fear governments in which everyone was the same and was ruled by a dictator. Thus, the genre of the dystopian novel emerged. “Dystopian novels show that any attempt at establishing utopia will only make matters much worse.” (Dietz, 1996) Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and 1984 by George Orwell are considered classic examples of this genre by such critics as Frank Dietz, Beaird Glover, and Donald Watt. These distinct novels both warn against utopia through the portrayal of the protagonist begins as part of a society in which the individual is non-existent, come into contact with influences that cause their rebellions, and eventually come into contact with some upper hand of the government.
Dystopian Literature seems to run along the same guidelines in terms of how the novels are set, and follow a similar chain of events leading to a great bittersweet climactic event. I will detail the similarities between the two novels Fahrenheit 451 and The Hunger Games. There is a reason behind the similarities of these two novels, and other dystopian literature. “The merits of dystopian literature are many.” (Erlich)
Dystopian fiction has spanned many recent decades, with the first piece of dystopian literature being considered as Gulliver’s Travels, penned in 1726, and the most recent works including Susanne Collings’s The Hunger Games trilogy and Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go. Despite the recent trend for dystopia on Britain’s bookshelves, perhaps the most forward moving dystopian novels of our times were written over fifty years ago. A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury pushed the boundaries of literature when ...
The famous writer Rita Mae Brown stated, “I think the reward for conformity is that everyone likes you except yourself.” This quote relates to the complex themes of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, and Disney Pixar’s “Wall-E”. As people in the society begin to act like everyone else, they lose themselves. In Fahrenheit 451, Mildred along with friends spent all their time in the parlor that they lost the value of knowledge and time. There were a few individuals like Guy Montag, who slowly were able to break apart from this bubble and realize the meaning behind books. This had also occurred in “The Lottery” when many people like Tessie saw beyond the superstitions behind the Lottery, but there will always be people
Over time things change in ways no one would have expected them to. In the novels 1984 by George Orwell and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, significant symbols develop into different things along the course of the books. Both novels are relatively similar and consist of the same theme; the destruction of society due to government power. Even though the authors styles differ, each novel contains different symbols that evolve overtime.
To many people books are just words on paper, but to others books represent a way of living. The books help citizens make choices on daily activities and help discover what knowledge to pass on to others. Books help a culture or society improve and grow in multiple ways. The words that are printed onto the pages of a story affects individuals, education, and culture as a whole. Since books affect all of those groups, it is hard to imagine a world without them. How different would life be with all the changes in the groups where books have affected them?
In both Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and A Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, a society is portrayed that the common citizen views as perfect. They are both, however, far from that. In an attempt to create a utopian society, they each created their own destructive dystopian society. Both are abundant in their faults, but living in the society of Fahrenheit 451 is the more favorable selection of the two. The World State of a Brave New World relies on drugs to limit the emotions of reality, which is unnatural. In Montag’s world, the institutions of families is allowed, unlike in A Brave New World, which is important to survive everyday life. The use of drugs is also not as widespread as it is in A Brave New World, which is
George Orwell’s 1984 details a nightmarish future society in which the government controls every aspect of civilian life and citizens do not even have privacy in their own thoughts. The English Socialist Party, or Ingsoc, successfully uses tactics such as language manipulation, propaganda, and constant surveillance to maintain their absolute hold on power. While many have read the novel as a sharp criticism of Stalin’s communist government, Erich Fromm writes in the novel’s afterword that “it would be most unfortunate if the reader smugly interpreted 1984 as another description of Stalinist barbarism, and if he does not see that it means us, too” (326). So is our society more similar to Winston’s than we would like to believe? Are we destined
Many of the sources that I have researched speak on relatively the same themes: very original. Even that phrase, that phrase I just used, “very original” has been stated a plethora of times. It is a bit ironic, right? Or is that not ironic? I read somewhere that, like, anything funny is, in some way, ironic. But I don’t know if it’s funny or not. I don’t think my brain owns ‘funny,’ you know,” to think that pointing out someone else’s unoriginality would also expose one’s own. Classic.
Dystopian Literature is a type of fiction literature that represents a bad view of the future and its people on it. It is basically a not so perfect world, where the people in charge and the government control everything in the general public; also where the conditions of life are really horrible from depression and everything else that comes along. Three famous works of dystopian literature include Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, and Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell.