Compare The Hunger Games And Fahrenheit 451

868 Words2 Pages

The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both great examples of dystopian fiction. A dystopia is a fictional world that takes place in the future that is supposed to be perceived as a perfect society, but it’s actually the opposite. Other things that a dystopian society might display are citizens both living in a dehumanized state and feeling like they’re constantly watched by a higher power. Dystopias are places where society is backwards or unfair, and they are usually are controlled by the government, technology, or a particular religion. The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 are both in the dystopian fiction genre because the societies within them show the traits of a dystopia. Both of them also have characters that go against the flow of the normal world. …show more content…

This appears in The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451. In The Hunger Games, the people are told by the government and the media that their society is a lot better than what is used to be, and that the reason they have the Hunger Games is because they want to remember what their people fought for. However, the government is using it as propaganda to cover up how twisted and wrong the country is. Their society would be much better off without the Hunger Games, having people constricted in small areas, and using higher powers (the president) to scare the public. They try to show it off as a perfect world, but it’s actually not. This is also evident in Fahrenheit 451 when everyone thinks their country is better than all of the rest, and that there’s nothing wrong at all. Their society is a disaster though; almost everyone is suicidal, no one can think for themselves, and all forms of recreation are either malicious or just not exciting at all. In both books, there are protagonists who realize that the society they live in is a dystopia, and they try to rebel against

Open Document