Although it seemed that the Chinese civilization was isolated from the other Eurasian civilizations, they created and built similar achievements and breakthroughs while still staying different. There are many comparisons and contrasts between the Greek and Chinese civilizations. To begin, one striking similarity was how they both subdivided their territories. With the territorial water terraces in China and the polis in Greece resembled one another intensively. Both the territorial princes and the polis magistrates held a larger amount of power over their subjects, but they retained differences in how they were elected (enterprising local landowners claimed the terraces as for the polis magistrates were elected). Surprisingly, the same accomplishments …show more content…
often developed at close time with no intention. Therefore, the subdivisions of the Greek and Chinese civilizations show comparisons between them. Also, another parallel similarity between the two was how they both were comprised of celebrated philosophers that are still relevant today. China’s Confucius invoked teachings to live a stable lifestyle and to conduct oneself as a gentleman. He is now attributed today with many revered quotes and his book, Analects is well known. Whereas the Greek philosophers, Plato and Aristotle’s teaching were slightly dissimilar to those of Confucius. They were known to ask questions to otherwise commonly tue statements and making inferences about the nature and physical world around us. Even though the last examples were displaying the resemblances between the two civilizations, their methods of collecting taxes were quite mismatched. Because of their abundant rivers and streams containing navigable waterways, the Chinese used canal boats to concentrate their tax income for their imperial leaders. On the contrary, Greeks diverged from the “tax farmer” technique and used the polis idea to keep their power local. Another instance of a difference between the two civilizations was their warfare strategies. The civilization of the Yellow River deployed their troops with crossbows and limited cavalry while the Greeks thrived with their patented phalanx warfare method. The phalanx warfare decided many more battles than the crossbows because of the concept’s unity to protect the each man next to him with spear and shield. In brief, there was congruity in comparison to the civilizations, but examples like the tax collection and warfare strategies emphasize contrasts as well. Furthermore, more exemplifications of alternative achievements was the coinage systems.
While the Chinese are not mentioned to have developed any sort of monetary device, Greek cities following King Croesus minted metal coins for everyday market transactions. This breakthrough made buying and selling more profitable because merchants or consumers no longer had to exchange items, but had these coins in which they were willing to depart with. However, as there were these disparities, there were more uniformities (than the ones above) as well. For example, the emergence of the Han and Macedonian Empires are strikingly indistinguishable. They both took over a group of divided states and legions to make one mass empire and they also finished polis and warring states periods. This created a more stable political order, less strife between states, and social order in both Greece and China. Another instance of similarities were the constant intrusive locally smaller tribes against the Greek and Chinese civilizations. In China, they experienced the recurring issue of the northern steppe raiders invading nearby villages. Their failed solutions included hiring steppe cavalrymen to guard posts and building defensive walls on northern frontiers. In Greece, they had periodic armed conflicts with Phoenicians, Carthaginians, and Etruscans while completing naval trade routes along Mediterranean and Black Sea shores. As a final point, those reasons were some of the samples of the comparisons and contrasts between the Greek and Chinese
civilizations. Finally, there are two more similarities and differences between the civilizations. The similarity was that both civilizations impacted cultural diffusion and influenced other civilizations. Emperor Wudi’s expedition cleared the path from China to Western Asia affecting ideas, techniques, diseases, crops, and other novelties towards the Central Asia and Asia’s southern borders. As for the Empire of Alexander the Great spread Greek culture of athletics, theater, wine drinking, monumental art, and philosophical theories as far as India via his conquests. Additionally, Greek styled urban markets took place around Southwest Asia to Egypt. Lastly, the last variation between the diverse and still intersecting civilizations was agricultural impact. The Chinese were able control diking and drainage of their floodplains across the Yellow River for the initial time. They spread a vast area of fertile fields controlling the Yellow River flooding while on elevated terraces growing millet and wheat. Their agricultural accomplishments defined the Chinese civilization while Greece did not rely on agriculture nearly as much due to their miniscule fertile fields and mountainous terrain. Both the Greeks and the Chinese shared many difference and many comparisons in important concepts and attainments. In conclusion, there was much to relate and contrast when considering the civilizations of Greece and China.
Han China and Rome, despite having some political and cultural differences, fell in ways that were almost directly parallel to one another. Both civilizations experienced declines in everything from culture and population to economy and government, as well as both suffering from attacks by nomadic invaders. However, each civilization's fall had their own unique factors, and the lasting impact of their falls differed greatly.
Han China was an empire that expanded over a vast territory and Classical Athens was only a small city-state. Inevitable, there were differences in all aspects of life. The documents provided plenty of information on demographics, government structures, individual roles and duties of a citizen, an view on physical life. Overall, the 64 million differences in population, the democracy that arose in Athens, the importance of a father-son relationship in Han China, and the interests in nature by the Hans were the key facts in the two’s differences.
Burbank and Cooper in their book Empires in World History portray the evolution of power and the development of different states. They elaborate on how powerful cities and states imposed their rules and waged conquest on surrounding territories. Political dynasties developed strongly among states inspired by religious, politic and economic trends. The Han dynasty of China and the Imperial Rome were some of the powerful states that developed during the third century. The two states adopted different strategies and ideas in developing of their emperor. The Roman, for instance, developed a more advanced for of governance as opposed to the Han. Their system of governance emerged as an expensive identity around the Mediterranean. These two empires controlled and conquered their territory in unique and different ways that made them strong and remarkable during their heyday.
When comparing different societies in ancient history you may not think that Han China and Ancient Rome had a lot in common. These two great societies had many similarities and differences, especially in their social structures. These similarities and differences are all due to Han China’s and Ancient Rome’s governments, family structures and religions. Both of these wonderful empires lasted for approximately 400 years and had lasting effects on the lands they conquered.
Ancient Greece and China had similar problems. They both had to deal with civil wars. They also dealt with rivers flooding. Lastly, they both had to deal with plague that killed a lot of the population in the Ancient lands.
The people of ancient civilizations like ancient China and ancient Greece chose to move from one place to another frequently to find a location that was most suitable for their settlement. How they determined a location was based on both its economical and geographical features. They would ask questions like “Will the soil be fertile enough to sustain plant life?” “Can I trade easily within the location?” “Is the terrain rocky or flat?” and so on. I will be analyzing the push and pull factors of ancient China and ancient Greece to determine why they moved from one region of their country to another. Pull factors are the good features of a region that would make people want to come to it like desirable economical and geographical features. Push factors are the bad features of a region that would cause people to want to move away from that region possibly because of economical and geographical features.
These civilizations present many resemblances that were once part of the foundations of their society. Although both of these civilizations were at one point enemies of one another, they had similar correlations that shaped and formed their cultures and societies. The main difference between these two civilizations is religion. Without its differences, each civilization had governed its people in manners that it could not be differentiated among each other. Overall, these civilizations presented different methods of leading a civilization and still had similarities among one another.
Many civilizations have similar qualities as other civilizations, but they also have their differences. Some of these differences include: Religion, Geography, and Government. These three things were a big part of any civilization. Two civilizations had many different things and many similar things. These civilizations are The Maya and The Romans. The Romans had a very unique and interesting culture, The Maya were also very interesting and different. Even though they were unique in their own way, they also had many similar qualities.
It is always important to look to the past in order to move towards the future. This was done in the formation of Western Society, and more specifically the formation of American society. The Greek culture served as a frame of reference for many aspects of Western life including government, architecture, math and the arts. Ancient Greek culture served as a very broad base for our society to be built upon.
Ancient Egypt and Ancient China often seem like polar opposites in almost every way. However, in one way, they are more similar than most people think. The beliefs of both of these civilizations were remarkably parallel, yet perplexingly different at the same time. Religion before 600 B.C.E. varied from society to society all around the globe, with just a few major religions taking hold in large areas. In both Egyptian and Chinese religions, they adhered to a polytheistic religion. Boths religions believed there were many gods who individually ruled over the many different parts of life, instead of one god ruling over all. Both Egyptian and Chinese cultures believed in life after death. Each one of these religions believed in some form of
Roman vs. Greek Civilization Although both Roman and Greek civilizations shared similarities in the areas of art and literature, their differences were many and prominent. Their contrasting aspects rest mainly upon political systems and engineering progress, but there are also several small discrepancies that distinguish between these two societies. This essay will examine these differences and explain why, ultimately, Rome was the more advanced civilization of the two. Greece, originally ruled by an oligarchy ("rule of the few"), operated under the premise that those selected to rule were selected based not upon birth but instead upon wealth.
All three societies had some form of belief in higher powers such as gods and other polytheistic beliefs. Ancient Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt had more duties involving their beliefs compared to Greece because both of those societies had ways of taking care of their religious sites such as feeding the gods daily or cleaning the temple area daily whereas there was not a huge emphasis on daily chores for Greece. Each society had originated around an ecologically useful area. Greece had a better advantage when compared to Egypt and Mesopotamia because both were prone to flooding. The Nile in Egypt constantly overflowed or ran dry causing harm to those who lived off of the river. The laws of each society were very male centered. Men were dominant over women in each society, but women in Egypt and Greece had more rights than those of Mesopotamia. Egyptian women could sue and file for divorce while Greek women could get jobs and retain property. The men gained more repercussions in Greece seeing as how rape and adultery would initiate a fine in Athens and not joining the army in Sparta would make you lose citizenship and the right to marry. Each society was also governed in some way making them similar, but the way they were governed makes them different. Mesopotamia was ruled by whoever conquered them, Egypt was ruled by a king, and Greece also had a king or an elected official. Each society did have slaves in some way, along with lower class. Egypt and Greece gave the middle lower class the option to become somewhat of a higher class through education and money. Power was determined mainly by wealth, birth, and income in the societies in some shape or form. Military was more of an important focus in Egypt and Greece than in Mesopotamia. The family structure of each civilization is still male centered and the male typically controls the family. Marriage and divorce is common in all
Abounding similarities exist between the Mesopotamian and Greek societies. As history progresses many cultural advances occur, but societies also adopt some of the same characteristics as preceding societies, you will notice this between the Mesopotamian and Greek civilizations. After learning about the Greek civilizations I immediately began generating connections to Mesopotamian societies. I noticed similarities in all aspects of society, whether it was religion, military, architecture or any other cultural idiosyncrasies.
Comparison of American and Chinese Cultures Cultural differences are apparent from one group of people to another. Culture is based on many things that are passed on from one generation to the next. Most of the time, people take for granted their language, beliefs, and values. When it comes to the cultural differences of people, there is no right or wrong. People should be aware of others culture and respect the differences that exist between them.
The word “ancient” can be a hard word to describe. It has no specific time period, but also does at the same time. When something is described as ancient, it is something that is extremely old, or was in the very distant past. Ancient Egyptian and Ancient Greek civilizations co-existed from 1150BC to 146BC. They had different systems, beliefs, and life styles, just like how different countries do today. There were also similarities, such as both having a single person be the ruler, not giving equal power to everyone. For Greeks, this would be a king and for Egyptians, and Pharaoh. Both Ancient Egypt and Ancient Greece believed in mythology – a similarity between the two. However, much of their mythology was different. Although both Egypt