Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of society on literature
Effect of society on literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Education is a fundamental value of many different cultures. While education is extremely advantageous, it can also be used to spread unethical ideals and biased beliefs. In both Orwell’s 1984 and McTeigue’s V for Vendetta, the protagonists’ imprisonment and tortures are used as a form of reeducation. However, in V for Vendetta, Evey’s torture is with the intent of making her powerful, whereas Winston’s torture in 1984 is with the intent of making him powerless. Both works note the intent of capture for both protagonists, although the outcomes are very different. They also both explore the idea of the protagonists’ knowledge of what will happen to them while being held captive, and it soon becomes apparent that this varies between the two works. …show more content…
Though the initial imprisonment of both Winston Smith and Evey Hammond is for committing treason against their respective governments’ Parties, it becomes apparent that the planned outcomes of their respective tortures are wildly different.
In 1984, Winston is tortured to a breaking point, after which he is incapacitated. Orwell discusses the final change in Winston when he describes, “[Winston gazing] up at the enormous face [of Big Brother]. Forty years it [has taken] him to learn what kind of smile [is] hidden beneath the dark moustache… but it [is] all right, everything [is] all right, the struggle [is] finished. He [has] won the victory over himself” (Orwell 311). Winston’s experiences in the Ministry of Love, especially Room 101, are his downfall. Winston loses all ability to oppose the Party and is reeducated into believing the Party’s ideals wholeheartedly. This is different from the outcome of Evey’s reeducation in V for Vendetta. …show more content…
The purpose of Evey’s torture is to her make her stronger, so she can become V’s successor. After Evey’s release from the prison, V tells her, “You [say] you [want] to live without fear. I wish there [is] an easier way but there [is not]” (McTeigue). Valerie’s note saves Evey in more ways than one. It provides her with strength she does not know she has. She realizes that standing up for what she believes in is vitally important. When she reads about Valerie’s refusal to hide away and pretend to be someone she is not, even in the face of severe consequences, Evey is empowered. While both 1984 and V for Vendetta explore the idea of repressing opposing beliefs, there are differences in the respective captors’ motivations to torture their prisoners. Another stark difference between the two works is the protagonists’ knowledge of what awaits them after their reeducation.
In 1984, Winston is tortured by O’Brien for information about Julia and the Brotherhood, however he is aware that there is no way to prevent his imminent annihilation. His confessions are not to prevent this, but to alleviate his suffering. He even asks O’Brien when he will be shot, to which O’Brien replies, “‘It might be a long time … you are a difficult case. But [do not] give up hope. Everyone is cured sooner or later. In the end we shall shoot you’” (Orwell 287). In Evey’s case, the situation is quite different. Evey is given the supreme ultimatum. If she reveals V’s identity or location, she will be set free. If she does not, she will be executed. In the film, the man who is to take her behind the chemical sheds to be shot tells her, “Look, all they want is one little piece of information. Just give them something, anything” (McTeigue). Evey insists she would rather die, and as a result, she is set free. This freedom is not only freedom from prison, but also freedom from the fear that has been governing her role in V’s revolution until this point. It is the strength she gains from both V and Valerie that gives her the power to lose the fear of death and become a martyr for V’s cause. Though she is initially resentful of V for inflicting her with such anguish, she comes to realize that V is right; she is no longer afraid. In 1984 and V for Vendetta,
the protagonists are held against their will for information and face severe mental and physical punishment if they withhold it. However, in 1984, Winston knows with certainty he cannot avoid death while in V for Vendetta, Evey knows she will be set free if she can provide the information being asked of her. Orwell’s 1984 and McTeigue’s V for Vendetta both use torture and imprisonment as an approach to reeducating the protagonists. The essential difference between the works are the intents of the captors. O’Brien attempts to dehumanize and weaken Winston while V attempts to empower and strengthen Evey. 1984 and V for Vendetta are both prime examples of dystopian societies with totalitarian governments. Their stunning descriptions of what can happen if personal beliefs contradict government values are frightening and should be used as a caution to be aware of government control.
Winston is arrested and taken to The Ministry of Love, another of the main government agencies. Here he is tortured physically by starvation and electrocution under the watch of The Party. He is manipulated physiologically by being conditioned to avoid torture by answering questions about his loyalty to The Party.
Winston commits “thoughtcrime” leading to his arrest and questioning at the Ministry of Love, the communities jail center working with matters pertaining to war. His comrade O’Brien begins torturing him in an underground room and calls it the “learning stage”. He teaches Winston the truth about the Party and their slogan; eventually he explains that “Freedom is Slavery” is easily reversed as “Slavery is freedom. Alone- free- the human being is always defeated… if he can make complete, utter submission… [and] merge himself in the Party… then he is all-powerful and immortal” (264). The Party uses this statement to illustrate that when one acknowledges the collective will, they become free from danger and desire. Those who are surrendered to INGSOC, including O’Brien, assume that when an individual has freedom they become subjugated to their senses and emotions. Moreover, Winston continues to be starved and tortured until he appears to be nothing but skin and bones when his opinions transition to align with the governments. He now accepts everything that O’Brien has expressed to him including that he is crazy and two plus two equals five. While he thinks about what he has been taught he thinks about “How easy it all was! Only surrender, and everything else followed… he hardly knew why he had ever rebelled” (278). In a sense, Winston is now free, only in a
George Orwell creates a dark, depressing and pessimistic world where the government has full control over the masses in the novel 1984. The protagonist, Winston, is low-level Party member who has grown to resent the society that he lives in. Orwell portrays him as a individual that begins to lose his sanity due to the constrictions of society. There are only two possible outcomes, either he becomes more effectively assimilated or he brings about the change he desires. Winston starts a journey towards his own self-destruction. His first defiant act is the diary where he writes “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER.” But he goes further by having an affair with Julia, another party member, renting a room over Mr. Carrington’s antique shop where Winston conducts this affair with Julia, and by following O’Brien who claims to have connections with the Brotherhood, the anti-Party movement led my Emmanuel Goldstein. Winston and Julia are both eventually arrested by the Thought Police when Mr. Carrington turns out to be a undercover officer. They both eventually betray each other when O’Brien conducts torture upon them at the Ministry of Love. Orwell conveys the limitations of the individual when it comes to doing something monumental like overthrowing the established hierarchy which is seen through the futility of Winston Smith’s actions that end with his failure instead of the end of Big Brother. Winston’s goal of liberating himself turns out to be hopeless when the people he trusted end up betraying him and how he was arbitrarily manipulated. It can be perceived that Winston was in fact concerned more about his own sanity and physical well-being because he gives into Big Brother after he is tortured and becomes content to live in the society he hated so much. Winston witnesses the weakness within the prole community because of their inability to understand the Party’s workings but he himself embodies weakness by sabotaging himself by associating with all the wrong people and by simply falling into the arms of Big Brother. Orwell created a world where there is no use but to assimilate from Winston’s perspective making his struggle utterly hopeless.
“He has finally learned to love big brother” was how George Orwell in his novel 1984 described Winston, conversion to the party are represented by big brother at the end of the novel. It is easy to believe that at this instance, after torturous reeducation that Winston has endured, he has lost free will and no longer be able to freely choose to love big brother but was forced to, against hiss will. Therefore Winston was never free to love big brother, and in fact not free at all after his “reeducation.” But if we are to accept a definition of free will that stipulates that we are able to produce and act on our own volitions we must accept that Winston has retained and has chosen to love big brother out of his own free will.
The approach towards freedom is hard to achieve against a totalitarian government, but possible to win with the people’s belief. 1984 by George Orwell and James McTeigue’s V for Vendetta portrays the same idealism of the anti-heroes, Winston and V. An anti-hero is “a protagonist who lacks the attributes that make a heroic figure, as nobility of mind and spirit, a life or attitude marked by action or purpose” (“Antihero”). Winston is not courageous, peaceful, and self-centered along the path of freedom for Oceania, whereas the anti-hero, V, is violent in his actions, impatient and careless in his pursuit to free London from the totalitarian government. As a matter of fact, V and Winston have the opposite behaviours; this is significant because it helps to compare the approach of the anti-heroes toward freedom. At the end of 1984 and V for Vendetta, the result of their approach is different from each other; Winston gives up on the liberation of Oceania, while V dies knowing that London is freed from Norsefire Party.
In 1984, children are exposed to depravation by government ideals, and are taught to expose all insurgence. In Vendetta, children are born into a media-corrupted world, unknowing of deprivation by lacking exposure. These negate the modern belief that children learn beliefs and ideas unbiasedly. Without communication, relationships in 1984 are restricted, thereby maturation is controlled. To mature, Winston used a diary, visited illegal places and engaged in an illegal relationship to grow his confidence in his experiences. In Vendetta, people do not mature intellectually, attributable to controlled communication. V matures his character through illegal practices; by murdering for liberation, and engaging in a relationship with Evey Hammond. In 1984, relationships between people are forced for procreation, or are amicable to government ideals. Winston's desperation for emotion and connection lead him to engage with Julia, who assists Winston’s psychological insurgency. V serendipitously encountered Evey, who dependently aids V’s emotional understanding of a civilian's perspective of his actions. Both females helped mature the protagonists’ critical life experiences, analogously with modern human values to support and love others. The evaluative question, ‘what is the good life?’ is evaluated in 1984, with Winston’s perspective being nonsynthetic food, freedom, real history and the ability of expression. Similarly in Vendetta, V convincingly claimed that society too often, “Appreciate the comforts of everyday routine, the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition”, thus indicating ignorance of governmental corruption. 1984 Londoners are ashen ascribable to the permanent presence of dust, providing an atmosphere of inevitability, where dust asphyxiates Winston's spirit. Working 60 hour weeks and earning little
From the beginning of the novel, it was inevitable that Big brother would eventually win, and Winston would be caught by the thought police. He could never have an immediate affect on the Party. His long and pointless struggle achieved no result in the end, and finally was brainwashed and lost any freedom of thought he once had.
The dystopian novel “1984” and the movie “V for Vendetta”, share a variety of differences and similarities. Both have a totalitarian government in which they have absolute power over politics, religion and human rights. Extensive speech, critical thinking, thoughtful writing, and voice of opinion has either been restricted or limited in 1984’s Oceania and V for Vendetta’s future London. The protagonists in both novels and films have “resisted” their government. However, the methods used to employ their “rebellion” are quite different.
In dystopian literature, the future of society and humanity is presented in a negative standpoint. Utopian works frequently illustrate a future in which the everyday lives of human beings is often improved by technology to advance civilization, while dystopian works offer an opposite outlook. Examples of dystopian characteristics include an oppressive government, a protagonist, and character nature. Although the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and the film V for Vendetta directed by James McTeigue display different perspectives of a dystopian society, both share similar dystopian characteristics, which include a government who asserts power over citizens, a protagonist who questions society, and characters who are isolated from the natural world.
The novel 1984 and film “V for Vendetta” both stories use torture as a way to brainwash the victim, to keep control over them and to take their identity away from them. Replacing it with another identity that is more beneficial to the party of the interrogator. The meanings of torture start of the similar, for the purpose of the creation of a new identity, but each story leads on to a different take on the verdict of a dystopian society run by a totalitarian government. Despite the themes expressed in each story and the purpose of torture being similar, the meaning and overall message conveyed to the readers from 1984 differ from those of “V for Vendetta”.
The societies in the works V for vendetta, directed by James McTeigue, and 1984, written by George Orwell, are two examples of societies that have evolved to form a dystopia within their own created realm. A closer look at the two societies reveals that they are similar with their leaders, physical power and their totalitarian rule, however, they posses differences within those three crucial dystopian themes. 1984’s differences portray a more successful dystopia. 1984’s leader, physical control and totalitarian rule create a pinnacle example of a successful dystopia in ways that V for Vendetta’s structure could not.
V for Vendetta is a graphic novel written by Allan Moore. It is a story full of comedy with V as the protagonist who is out to fight and destroy the government and affects innocent people. The novel was later adapted into a film and directed by James McTeigue and written by Wachowski Brothers.
The movie and the book are different in many ways but at the same time they have a lot of things in common, the movie doesn't have as much details as the book does but it is a very good movie. In the movie you can very easily see and understand what's going on being you are watching the whole thing with your eyes. The movie also shows you how the students have to fight each and everyday just so that they protect themselves in the streets, the streets is all they know because well they were born and raised in the streets so they learned all about it & are about it. In the movie you can clearly see the struggle they go through, and how the streets are & when they're in school. School is supposed to be a safe place for all kids.
In V for Vendetta, Evey Hammond is only ready to assist society in the creation stage of their revolution after undergoing her own transformation. At the beginning of the graphic novel, she is rescued through the death of her oppressors. This, just as the destruction of corrupt institutions, creates the space for freedom. V not only creates this space for both Evey and society but also calls them out of their passivity. Particularly, he challenges Evey to be stronger than her past because “[it] can't hurt [her] anymore, not unless [she] allows it” (). Furthermore, the government has turned her into a “victim” and a “statistic,” but she has the power to free herself (). It is Evey's responsibility to find such power within herself and become “forever changed” ().
After reading the book and watching the movie 1984 there were similarities and differences between the two. The novel is about manipulating people in believing in something that isn’t really there and about erasing history. Both the book and film focused on: authority, government, and war. The book and film follow the theme of conformity to control society.