Silky Shaving Case Summary

861 Words2 Pages

Summary of Current Situation
As an effort to assist Phoebe Masters with making a decision regarding the future of the Soft and Silky Shaving Gel brand (SSSG), a report was created to provide a detailed analysis on the important decisions. After analyzing the Women’s Shaving market, we found that women use a variety of methods for hair removal. While the most popular method is simply shaving with razors and soap and water, an increase in shaving with razors and shaving creams and gel is starting to take over the market. SSSG is faced with a big decision that can have a positive or negative impact on the growth of the company.
SSSG is marketed by Dermavescent Laboratories, Inc., which is a manufacturer of women’s personal-care products with …show more content…

dollar value of women’s “wet shaving” products were estimated to be about $550 million at manufacturer’s prices. Since 2000, sales growth has been between 3 to 5 percent per year. Razors and blades accounted for 77 percent of women’s “wet shaving” products. While shaving creams and gels accounted for 23 percent of annual sales. On average, women spend about $12.50 for razors, blades, and shaving preparations per year.
Women who used shaving cream or gels had few women-only products to choose from. However, due to new-product activity, the shaving cream and gel category had emerged in 1999. This led to an increase in advertising and promotion, and improved shaving technology. Industry analysts cited improvements in the quality for shaving creams and gels for women and increased advertising. Advertising and promotion for Soft and Silky Shaving Gel had responded to the increase in competition. Looking at the table below, we can see the representative brands, sizes, forms and typical retail prices for …show more content…

Looking at sales in 2006 in comparison to 2005, there will be a total loss in sales of about $12,030.80. A loss in COGS of about $2,532.80 with a loss in gross profit of $9,498. While advertising & promotion expenses and overhead & administrative expenses with stay the same, we will continue to see a decrease in brand contribution by $9,498, a loss in unit sales of 6,332 and a loss in ounces sold by 34,826.
If we assume there to be a 2% decrease in sales, we will see the following decreases from 2005 to 2006.

Looking at the table above, we see a total loss in sale of $74,480 with a loss of $15,680 in COGS. Additionally, a loss in gross profit and brand contribution of about $58,800 with a decrease in unit sales by $39,200 and a decrease in units sold of about

More about Silky Shaving Case Summary

Open Document