Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology's impact on relationships
Face to face communication pros and cons
Technology's impact on relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology's impact on relationships
In “Friendships have never been so easy – or so silent,” an editorial featured in the Globe and Mail, Judith Timson discusses the recent prevalence of virtual communication as the main mode of sustaining friendships, and examines the upsides and downsides of this phenomenon through the use of statistics, expert testimonies, and anecdotal evidence. Timson tactfully expresses concerns over the declining face-to-face bonding time shared between friends without overtly pronouncing her bias against online connecting, and superficially applauds the convenience of virtual communication while hinting at the irreplaceable importance of face-to-face bonding. Ultimately, Timson strives to instill friendship appreciation into the readers, reminding them that efficient management of friendships should always be undergirded by emotional support via face-to-face contact.
Timson launches the article with an empathetic tone by describing the commonly relatable experience of maintaining friendships via online communication, and coining the term “silent friendships” to emphasize this phenomenon as the main focus of her article, and further provides the readers with statistics and expert testimonies that explicate her concerns. Somewhat resignedly, Timson admits her following with the flow, while insinuating her slight dissatisfaction with the friendship practice of “go[ing] for weeks if not months without seeing each other or hearing each other’s voices.” To establish an impression of the degree to which online communication has revolutionized people’s, especially women’s, friendships, Timson cites a well-known, reliable source to show that her concerns are by no means excessive or exaggerative. Moreover, Timson fearfully, albeit calmly, ponders o...
... middle of paper ...
...ossible failure encountered by the readers prompt them into thinking critically of the dynamics of a healthy friendship, and encourage the readers to contemplate ways of improving their interpersonal relationships.
Ultimately, “Friendships have never been so easy – or so silent” is an editorial wrapped with subtle yet strong criticism of the dependence of friendship bonding via technologies and passionate praises for the value of face-to-face communication. Timson employs statistics, expert testimonies, and anecdotal evidence to convey to the readers that face-to-face interactions offer sentimentalism that online communication lacks. While Timson might have repelled some readers with her overly tactful expressions, the article is nonetheless a well-written piece that is relatable to most who have had firsthand experience of Timson’s concept of “silent friendships.”
One of the ways Steinbeck shows the importance of friendship is through interactions between characters. In the
The audience can empathize easily with Sue and the death of her youngest and this allows the audience to understand the usefulness of Facebook “friends”; however, Dailey’s shift to present the other side of the argument with Bugeja’s forward truth of the flaws in online social networks. Bugeja convinces the reader that reality provides a more intimate level of support that the virtual world can never offer. Dailey could have ended the article on a stronger note that Facebook “friends” only serves as an additive to friendships to reality. In reference to Henry Adams infamous quote, Facebook “friends” cannot be made but built from existing
5). By never losing touch with acquaintances made throughout life, we lose what has made “good old-fashioned” losing touch so good (para. 5). We lose real friendships and “long-forgotten photos and mixtapes” (para. 5). Without these natural aspects that are so important to friendship, friends have not only lost their worth, but the whole point of a friendship has been lost as well. Arguing that losing touch is a necessity of friendship, Brown suggests that maybe the issue could be resolved if only social networks would create a “Fade Utility” app that would allow unintended friends to gradually blur into a sepia cast, similar to the way unintended friends naturally fade away from our lives (para. 6). Maybe if networks treated friendships the way nature does, providing opportunities for people to reach out to lost friends if they choose, then online friendships might hold the same meaning as natural friendships, where the title “friend” is not just a banner of status, but a position in a
She recalls a disagreement that took place on Facebook between her and a close friend over a few comments placed on her timeline. Wortham describes how she felt embarrassed over the pointless argument. She discloses “I’m the first one to confess my undying love of the Web’s rich culture and community, which is deeply embedded in my life. But that feud with a friend forced me to consider that the lens of the Web might be warping my perspective and damaging some important relationships” (171). Introducing her personal feelings and perspective of how she feels Facebook is taking over her own emotional response online weakens her argument. Wortham reasons that others feel the same as she does. She says, “This has alarmed some people, convincing them that it’s time to pull the plug and forgo the service altogether” (171). Wortham does not bring in other testimonies of those who feel the same as she does, therefore the readers are only introduced to her personal
In “Friends with Benefits: Do Facebook Fiends Provide The Same Support As Those in Real Life?”, Kate Dailey argues about whether the Facebook social scene could replace that of real life or it just mimics the likely course of friendship if people would still be close. The narrative begins with Dailey sharing an anecdote about a personal situation concerning a friend who just went through a hard time, the nonchalant friendship which the essay gravitates towards. While realizing the tragic news, her argument comes into place: is Facebook a great place to spread negative news or is it unable to beat the warmth in people’s physical reaction?.
People put all their attention and time into their virtual worlds which leads to missing important connections with others. The text also says that “Research shows that virtual-world friends provide mostly bridging social capital,while real-world friends provide bonding social capital.” On social media people are only surface-level friends with others; they are not true friends. However, when someone makes a real-world connection with someone else, they get to experience bonding on a deeper level. Maintaining deeper friendships can help you have close connections with others later in life.
He connects the idea of how friendships now, are associated with youth and something we are all meant to grow out of eventually. He continues by stating that, the moral content of classical friendship, which are to improve together, had been lost to a society that is too sensitive to criticism. He adds that the introduction of Facebook and Myspace have ironically destroyed the nature of friendships. He is saddened by that fact that the term friend has been reduced to nothing but a feeling. He pokes fun at the fact that humans don’t like being isolated, so he adds that the internet gives us a false sense of community. He scoffs at posts because they make everything becomes more public and less intimate, which turns an individual into an indistinguishable mass of people. He does gives credit to social media, since they do have their benefits such as, reconnecting long-lost friends while far-flung ones can stay in touch, but he backtracks by stating that people seem more like they are trying to imitate themselves. Lastly he compares positing personal information to pornography, which is slick, impersonal exhibition. He finishes by solemnly stating that friendships have turned into the cold, unfeeling computers we are so used
Technology has advanced a lot and has been greatly impacting our lives since the Industrial Revolution. The appearance of the mobile phone, the computer, and the tablets have all changed our ability to communicate with people around the world. Although technologies have greatly improved our lifestyle, they have brought many negative effects on our relationships and happiness as well, for instance distorting people's views on one another and bringing more loneliness to people's lives. Many people believe that benefited by social media platforms such as Facebook, it is now not necessary to talk to someone in person in order to effectively communicate with one and know one’s life. Others, however, believe that technology alone cannot replace
“The Facebook Sonnet” by Sherman Alexie brings up ideas and controversy over social media because it decreases face-to-face communication. Though Facebook allows people to contact old and new friends, it renders away from the traditional social interaction. Online, people are easily connected by one simple click. From liking one’s status to posting multiple pictures, Facebook demands so much attention that it’s easy for users to get attach. They get caught up in all the online aspect of their lives that they fail to appreciate real life relationships and experiences.
In the world today, people are constantly surrounded by technology. At any given moment, we can connect to others around the world through our phones, computers, tablets, and even our watches. With so many connections to the outside world, one would think we have gained more insight into having better relationships with the people that matter the most. Despite these connections, people are more distant to one another than ever. In the article, “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk," author Sherry Turkle details her findings on how people have stopped having real conversations and argues the loss of empathy and solitude are due to today’s technology. Turkle details compelling discoveries on how technology has changed relationships in “Stop Googling. Let’s Talk,” and her credibility is apparent through years of research and the persuasive evidence that supports her claims.
It shows through social media, or personal experiences, giving contemporary friendship a section in people’s experiences, and giving meaning to life.
Adam Briggle also talks about how on online friendships in his article Real friends: how the internet can foster friendship. He states that we can sell our best quality and hide or not show the weaker side of ourselves, whereas in face-face friendships we may not be able to hide those negative traits about ourselves and they may just come out without our knowledge. This being said gives us or the internet user full control on how and what they what to share with other individuals online. (Briggle, 2008, p.
Various electronics are frequently used to go on pointless websites, such as Twitter and Facebook, which ruin society’s social abilities. More and more people use social media on the internet as a communication source. This does not apply merely to kids and teens, but adults as well. Using these sorts of websites as a way of communicating causes many individuals’ social skills to decrease. A plethora of children and teens would rather stay inside and interact with their friends through the internet than go hang out with them. Before technology people were not afraid to go up to a random person and talk to them. Now many friendships form through the internet and these friendships are not genuine. When these “friends” meet in person, they find nothing to talk about. For example, I remember after watching Perks of being a Wallflower, a movie taking place in the early nineties, my friends and I discussed how all the characters communicated in person and during hanging out they played games and talked. Now...
Rosen, Christine. “Virtual Friendship and the New Narcissism.” What Matters In America. Third Edition. Gary Goshgarian and Kathryn Goodfellow. New Jersey: Pearson, 2012. 52-60. Print.
“In order to maintain a positive on-going relationship in any difficult face-to-face circumstance, an individual must learn the appropriate socialization rituals. Knowing these rituals and being able to play a proper front stage role is crucial in order for an individual to get along with others (Brignall and Valey, 2005).” With the relatively recent rise of social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook, the means for maintaining relationships through these platforms rather than speech communication and face-to-face communication are becoming much more apparent and widespread throughout society. However, it is difficult to maintain these relationships without knowing proper social skills especially if these skills are not practiced or introduced to an individual. Although, “Communication frequency and self-disclosure play a role in computer-mediated communication and the formation of online friendships just as they do in face-to-face interactions and offline friendships (Subrahmanyam and Greenfield, 2008).” Yet, in our vast digital world that we reside in today, the ways in which we choose to communicate are becoming hindered by our participation in online communication. “We must have a philosophical understanding of the purpose and importance of communication to individuals and based upon this understanding, shape our attitude and value toward the communication process (McFarlane, 2010).” It is extremely crucial to understand communication’s importance and to not tuck the original beliefs and values regarding the tool underneath the rug, resorting and succumbing to communicating poorly in a fashion that mimics what we have now experienced via our devices. “As with any social change, we also believe there is a need to study and understand the impacts that change might have, regardless of whether such changes are viewed as positive or