Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Hierarchical social structure
Hierarchical social structure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Hierarchical social structure
In Scott Brown’s essay Facebook Friendonomics, he discusses the idea of infinite friendspace and friend hoarding as allowed by social networks and what he calls the “networked world” (para. 3). In his essay, he mainly criticizes how these networks have turned people and relationships into a kind of social “currency” that follows the same rules as financial relations: more is better, but the more you have, the less worth each friend holds (para. 3). Friends are no longer people with whom one has a relationship or connection with -- instead they are simply collectibles that are infinitely preserved in the folder “Friend” (para. 2). Thus, social networks allow people to hoard friends through a kind of “friendonomics,” as people grow more and …show more content…
5). By never losing touch with acquaintances made throughout life, we lose what has made “good old-fashioned” losing touch so good (para. 5). We lose real friendships and “long-forgotten photos and mixtapes” (para. 5). Without these natural aspects that are so important to friendship, friends have not only lost their worth, but the whole point of a friendship has been lost as well. Arguing that losing touch is a necessity of friendship, Brown suggests that maybe the issue could be resolved if only social networks would create a “Fade Utility” app that would allow unintended friends to gradually blur into a sepia cast, similar to the way unintended friends naturally fade away from our lives (para. 6). Maybe if networks treated friendships the way nature does, providing opportunities for people to reach out to lost friends if they choose, then online friendships might hold the same meaning as natural friendships, where the title “friend” is not just a banner of status, but a position in a
The audience can empathize easily with Sue and the death of her youngest and this allows the audience to understand the usefulness of Facebook “friends”; however, Dailey’s shift to present the other side of the argument with Bugeja’s forward truth of the flaws in online social networks. Bugeja convinces the reader that reality provides a more intimate level of support that the virtual world can never offer. Dailey could have ended the article on a stronger note that Facebook “friends” only serves as an additive to friendships to reality. In reference to Henry Adams infamous quote, Facebook “friends” cannot be made but built from existing
Fleming begins her argument by paralleling the transformative properties of the invention of the telephone years ago to social networks today (Fleming). But, Fleming states that “students’ online identities and friendships come at a price, as job recruiters, school administrators, law enforcement officers and sexual predators sign on and start searching” (Fleming). Social networking websites like MySpace and Facebook are frequented favorites, especially by college students. These sites have become so popular that “friending” a person is now a dictionary verb. However, Fleming believes that students are not as cautious as they should be. In fact, “thirty percent of students report accepting ‘friend’ reques...
Have you ever made any friends via Facebook, Twitter, or Snapchat that you have never met before? I know I have through Twitter due to having the same interests. Some may say those friends are not really your friends, but virtual ones instead. In the article, “The Limits of Friendships,” by Maria Konnikova, she talks about friendships that are made virtually and in reality. The author argues that the use of social media has hindered friendships and face to face connections within one’s social circle, however, she does not address that they have met their closest support group through social media. Face to face connections help identify who one’s true friends are and they are more realistically made when it is in person rather than over social media, but there Konnikova fails to address the fact that social media has allowed many to connect
People have the fundamental desire to maintain strong connections with others. Through logic and reasoning, Sherry states, “But what do we have, now that we have what we say we want, now that we have what technology makes easy?”(Turkle). Face to face conversations are now mundane because of the accessibility to interact at our fingertips, at free will through text, phone calls and social media. Belonging, the very essence of a relationship has now become trivial.
In the article “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” by Stephen Marche, the author tries to show that Facebook impacts on society in the various ways. Moreover, the purpose of this article is to convince the readers that they should really connect to each other like face-to-face contact rather than spending time online the social media. Marche states that “Facebook doesn’t destroy friendships, but it doesn’t create them either” (Marche 608). The author’s audience would be middle-aged adults and middle class in May 2012 that buy and read about the social media because they might be up sad of their life. He also discusses that social network is making us lonely, or if lonely people are addicted to the Internet. However, he states social network is “merely a tool” (608), and we can choose how to use them. Marche sounds very cynical. He is an analyst, but his article is not clear enough. The author’s situation is so complicated because he uses too much examples and stories. Stephen Marche in “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” is not effective in using pathos, connotative languages, tone and emotions to convince the reader that they should really connect to each other face-to-face rather than spending time online.
Maintaining an extended metaphor to compare social media profiles to self-portraits, Rosen leads her audience to the conclusion that as social media grows in popularity, friendships will be increasingly devalued and redefined. Using a combination of rhetorical questions and scholarly sources, Christine Rosen’s sarcastic tone works to keep the reader engaged as she explores the future of social interaction and self-identity as shaped by virtual culture.
“The Facebook Sonnet” by Sherman Alexie brings up ideas and controversy over social media because it decreases face-to-face communication. Though Facebook allows people to contact old and new friends, it renders away from the traditional social interaction. Online, people are easily connected by one simple click. From liking one’s status to posting multiple pictures, Facebook demands so much attention that it’s easy for users to get attach. They get caught up in all the online aspect of their lives that they fail to appreciate real life relationships and experiences.
In “I’m So Totally, Digitally, Close to You: The Brave New World of Digital Intimacy,” an article first appeared in Wired and New York Times Magazine in 2008, Clive Thompson, a Canadian journalist, writer, and blogger, writes about the connection between society and the impact of social media. He points out the main topics, first explaining about the users’ attraction of Facebook and other forms of “incessant online contact” (585), then the benefits and disadvantages of social networking sites, and the rise of online awareness. Undoubtedly, social media has definitely expanded our social circle allowing for more relationships and making our close ones stronger. In addition, it has also rapidly changed our traditional understanding of relationships
Or is there a third way?” by Devon Bonady, claims the overuse of technology can only bring people that is close to us far away. She argues that the internet is a bad tool. She keeps the idea of communication in real person; talk to each other face to face and not through any social media on internet. The topics discussed include her choice for not being dependent on technology such as cell phones and social networking services like Facebook. Her argument is we do not need social media and that will not make us isolated because the main point is the human interaction. Her idea is perfectly fit with the novel when Mae spend hours on her computer screen just to click like and comments on other posts in social media network (Eggers 64-100). Bonady starts the text by using an anecdotal of her own experience. The online world may not be replacing our real world social live. Social media can provide us a lot of quantity, we can interact with five people at once, and we can communicate oversea but does not mean that the internet chatting is making more friendships than reality way. I agree with her passage when she says, “I want to focus on quality, not quantity” (Bonady 45). Let say, I have 400 friends on my social my network account, but it does not mean that I know them all. It is not like I have 400 friends and that I can hang out with all. She tries to escape the computer communication as much as possible. People nowadays is addicted to online
In her article “Friends Indeed?” Joel Garreau explains that for two decades, online social networks have been touted as one of the finest flowerings of our new era. But what is the strength of ties so weak as to barely exist? Who will lend you lunch money? Who’s got your back?” Technology has overtaken individuals by social media, allowing many people to communicate online rather than having face-to-face communication. Many “relationships” begin online, and end online. Although, true relationships are rarely created fast, it gradually grows and becomes stronger and stronger over the years. However, in our immediate society this is not the case. But the questions still remains, as Joel Garreau points out “Who would lend you lunch money?” in other words, who will help you physically not online. In our impatient society, technologies influenced the way individual communicate, and that often times leads to depression, loneliness and addictions.
Ultimately, “Friendships have never been so easy – or so silent” is an editorial wrapped with subtle yet strong criticism of the dependence of friendship bonding via technologies and passionate praises for the value of face-to-face communication. Timson employs statistics, expert testimonies, and anecdotal evidence to convey to the readers that face-to-face interactions offer sentimentalism that online communication lacks. While Timson might have repelled some readers with her overly tactful expressions, the article is nonetheless a well-written piece that is relatable to most who have had firsthand experience of Timson’s concept of “silent friendships.”
Little do they know how big a toll it is taking on their relationships. Hundreds of virtual friends create an illusion of closeness and popularity. Unfortunately the social media addiction is often linked with narcissism, loneliness and depression. Many people discover that in a crowd of virtual friends they can not find a person they can rely on in a real life crisis situation. Yvette Vickers, former Playboy Playmate, died quietly in her home, and her body was not discovered until almost a year after her death- computer still glowing. She was alone in the world with no children or religious affiliation and only sought companionship as an elderly woman in distant fans which found her online (Marche). Mark Vernon notes the studies of two scientists on the field of “intimate friendships” in his articled dubbed “Is True Friendship Dying Away?”. He shares statistics that over half of Brits claim they are living in a lonelier society, and two-fifth recalled feeling increasingly distanced from their close friends. The quality of friendships is what has gone extinct and many blame it simply on the timely demands of their daily
... limited privacy these websites provide, the ambient awareness that brings a whole new meaning to knowing someone, and how although our “weak ties” may be stronger, our relationships often suffer as a result. “I Am So Totally, Digitally Close to You” made me realize how much this social media craze is affecting our population and myself personally.
Social media is used by many people, young and old around the world as a way to communicate. Our lives have become so busy that it is difficult to maintain family and social relationships. “They use social networking sites including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. On these sites users create profiles, communicate with friends and strangers, do research and share thoughts, photos, music, links and more” (Social Networking). With the use of social media you can be friends with all sorts of people without actually seeing or knowing them. “In many ways, social communities are the virtual equivalent of meeting at the general store or at church socials to exchange news and get updated on friends and families” (Cosmato).
Nowadays, technology plays a significant role in all our lives. Friends come and go but online friendships stays unless you deleted them on your friends