Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
China in Africa: a big step forward, or a bigger step backward
China in Africa: A Big Step Forward, or a Big Step Backward
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
ABSTRACT
African economy is discussed greatly in today’s world. The African continent is rich in resources but the most of the population is poor. Decade after decade, politicians and international organizations have failed to reduce poverty. Nor have they been able to help Africa generate growth or build basic infrastructure.
The only way of growth is to invest huge amount of money into the economy which china is giving past 10 years.
In this research we will study the influence of Chinese aid on the growth of western economies of Africa considering the case of Sierra Leone.
We found with the research that the aid may have been associated with improvement in economic growth in the country; its impact during the period of war is found to be
…show more content…
Sierra Leone is a nominally Muslim country, though with an influential Christian minority. Religious affiliation is 60% Muslim, 30% indigenous beliefs, and 10% Christian. Sierra Leone is regarded as one of the most religiously tolerant nations in the world. Muslims and Christians collaborate and interact with each other peacefully. Religious violence is very rare in the country. Sierra Leone has relied on mining, especially diamonds, for its economic base. It is also among the largest producers of titanium and bauxite, a major producer of gold, and has one of the world's largest deposits of rutile. Sierra Leone is home to the third-largest natural harbor in the world. Despite exploitation of this natural wealth, 70% of its people live in poverty. (Alexander Peter Kup, …show more content…
Civil conflicts inevitably destabilize and damage the political and economic institutions that are necessary if aid is to be put to effective use. This is not to say that donors should not grant any aid during civil conflicts. Instead aid given under such conditions should be viewed as a measure targeting short-term economic stability rather than long term economic growth. Aid and Growth in the post-war period: 2002-07 There are three reasons for singling out the post-war period to find out if aid remains positively significant on economic growth during this period.
First since the end of the 11-year civil conflict Sierra Leone has had substantial inflows of foreign aid from a diverse range of donors sympathetic to the destruction of human resources, and social and physical infrastructure in the country.
Second, there has been considerable strengthening of the countries policies and institutions.
Third there have been reports and attacks on the government as well as the donor community for their misuse of foreign aid flows after the civil conflict. The fact that the results show that aid had a positive impact on growth during the post-war era is perhaps unsurprising given the substantial influx of aid to Sierra Leone during this period and the reform of its institutions to standards surpassing their pre-war
Priscilla. “The World Economy and Africa.” JSpivey – Home – Wikispaces. 2010. 29 January 2010. .
Zack-Williams, A.B. (2001). Child Soldiers in the Civil War in Sierra Leone. Review of African Political Economy, 28 (87), 73–82.
Every year, more and more money is donated to Africa to promote democracy in order to get rid of the powerful coups in many countries through out the continent. While the coups are declining and democratic governments are being established, the economic growth and development of Africa is not anywhere it should be considering the abundant natural resources and coastline that the continent possesses. Even though countries, like the United States of America, donate millions of dollars they are a large reason why Africa is underdeveloped economically. The Trans-Atlantic Slave trade is the most devastating event in the history of the world. Nearly 14,000,000 men, women, and children were displaced, sold into slavery, and killed by the trade routes.(
Economic ways started in the nineteenth century, still have a hold on the countries of the sub-Sahara today. These countries are all impoverished and have seen horrific civil wars, however, the general consensus is that they are making slow improvements in their economy. The starvation, overpopulation and health problems are still very evident. Perhaps continued assistance coupled with education and protection will keep them on the road to stability and more rewarding lives for their citizens.
The war in Sierra Leone was hideous. Everyone in the country was affected in one way or another. Whether they personally were injured, had a loved one killed or got recruited to fight, no one was left unscathed. Many of the effects will affect the families financially. Sierra Leone needs funding to help families stay out of poverty and to rebuild their country after the war.
As colonization went on, the Africans were exploited economically and were completely stripped of their resources. Despite all of the riches they had hidden in their land, they turned into one of the poorest groups of people and European nations obtained all of the wealth. Due to the colonization by the Europeans, “African’s remain the poorest people in the world amidst their own riches in their own African Continent” and they are still used by the imperialist nations to this day (Pheko). Africa was a country rich in culture, but the Europeans only saw it as rich in resources. European colonialism in Africa has had many consequences on the stability of Africa’s
Sierra Leone’s civil war lead to the displacement of over one million people, with brutal killings and children armed with guns, all for the sake of power. Sierra Leone is the most abundant country in the world, based off resources. The main resource being diamonds. Leone is known for its quantity of diamonds, but due to the leadership, it is one of the poorest countries in the world. Even though the Joseph Momoh government was the cause of the mass destruction of Sierra Leone, due to the fact the leaders were unwilling to adapt to the needs of the people, Sierra Leone's civil war was founded off the distribution, or lack of distribution, of resources to its citizens.
Dambisa Moyo, Author of “Dead Aid”, explains how in aiding the African countries, we have actually hurt them in the process. Many of these points she explains include the fact that since the 1970s the percentage of Africans living on a dollar a day has risen from 10% to 70%, 60% of the African population are now 24 and under, and that the income per capita has fallen dramatically. Moyo states that Africa has become “addicted to aid” meaning that most of the governments’ money is from aid. However none of this money made it to the people causing unrest and coups throughout Africa; being that the only way to acquire a lot of money is to be in control of the government. She also states that the African governments are not acting on behalf of their
(http://en.wikipedia.org, 2014). But in 1991 Civil war starts in Sierra Leone which ruins the whole Country. But the war ends in 1991 and Ahmad Tejan Kabbah was democratically elected as President of Sierra Leone.
Political instability and the menace of conflict is still a powerful deterrent to economic growth and poverty reduction. The assassination of the presidents of Burundi and Rwanda in 1993 sparked an ethnic clash and genocide in R...
There is no doubt that European colonialism has left a grave impact on Africa. Many of Africa’s current and recent issues can trace their roots back to the poor decisions made during the European colonial era. Some good has resulted however, like modern medicine, education, and infrastructure. Africa’s history and culture have also been transformed. It will take many years for the scars left by colonization to fade, but some things may never truly disappear. The fate of the continent may be unclear, but its past provides us with information on why the present is the way it is.
Poor countries have been receiving aid from the international community for over a century now. While such aid is supposed to be considered an act of kindness from the donor nations or international bodies, it has led to over dependence among the developing countries. They have adopted the habit of estimating and including international aid in their national budgets to reduce their balance of trade deficits. It is believed that foreign aid is necessary for poor nations in order to break the cycle of poverty that ties their citizens in low productivity zones and so their economy will not be weak. However, some critics view the extension of aid to poor countries as means of keeping the nations in economic slumber so that they can wake up from only by devising ways of furthering self-sustainability. Because of these two schools of thought concerning the topic, debate has arisen on which side is more rational and factual than the other. The non-sustainable nature of international aid, however, leaves the question of what may happen in the event that foreign aid is unavailable for the poor nations. After thorough consideration on the effects of the assistance to poor countries, it is sufficient to state that giving international aid to the poor nations is more disadvantageous than beneficial to the nations. This point is argued through an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of giving international aid to the poor countries with appropriate examples drawn from various regions of the world to prove the stance.
Foreign aid can encourage countries to adopt positive political and economic policies if that is its principal objective. But it may, on the contrary, undermine development if it is given to countries that are unlikely or unwilling to make necessary political, economic and governance reforms. Since there are some different thoughts on foreign aids, critics of aid such as Peter Bauer have argued that aid is never necessary. For example, “Foreign aid is a central component of world development”. So in 1981, said Professor Hollis Chenery, then Vice President of World Bank in charge of economic research, how can he have been right? Large scale development occurs in many places with...
Artadi, Elsa V., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. The Economic Tragedy of the XXth Century: Growth in Africa. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003. Print.
The majority of the continent of Africa has not been as economically progressive as the other continents in today’s world. However, over the past few years, it has been rapidly growing. Although there have been multiple countries in Africa that have reflected a strong growing economy, such as South Africa and Botswana, there are many other countries that are still corrupt and are still struggling to grow as a nation. There are many challenges that are facing Africa currently. Some of these major challenges being, corrupt governments, vicious cycles of aid, and poverty traps. However, among these challenges, there still lies to be great opportunities for Africa within their technology and business sectors.