Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect Cultural Change
Effect Cultural Change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect Cultural Change
However, while “freak shows” no longer have the same level of popularity, they have been able to attract a small audience and make a nice living for themselves. For example, Rachel Adams, author of Sideshow U.S.A: Freaks and the American Cultural Imagination, describes modern “freak shows” by stating, “Aware that scarcity or impending extinction are certain crowd pleasers, freak shows advertise not only the rarity of individual attractions, but the more general enterprise of human exhibition itself as a threatened practice” (Adams 211). Showmen have become aware that they need to change the way they advertise “freak shows” because people are more aware of their exploitative past. So, they advertise the shows in more of a family-friendly or …show more content…
For instance, consider shows such as My 600 Pound Life and Ruby have audiences that were originally derived from “freak shows”. For instance, Laura Backstrom of the Sociological Forum, describes a comment made by an anonymous executive who stated, “The more extreme and unusual the angle, the more valuable a story is … There’s an innate morbid fascination. It’s the modern-day equivalent of a freak show” (Backstrom 692). This comment compares “freak shows” to these shows displaying obesity and that comparison is also true regarding the audience. “Freak shows” led to the discovery of a niche audience that was willing to watch these weird and unusual spectacles. Shows utilizing dwarfs can be categorized in the same manner. Actors such as Peter Dinklage and the late Verne Troyer were able to carve out respectable careers due to the niche audience. Without “freak shows”, dwarfs might not have had an opportunity to be treated seriously and have their talents fully put on display. However, “freak shows” have not only had an impact on shows about obesity and dwarfism, but they have had an impact on reality tv as a whole. Shows like Jersey Shore and Real Housewives can trace their popularity back to “freak shows”. This is because, at its core, “freak shows” display a spectacle of humanity and they put on display people who have some sort of strange or weird talent. In other words, they display people and acts that people would not see in a normal setting. Reality TV operates in a similar manner because they put on display a spectacle of humanity through outlandish characters that you might not see in a normal setting. Obviously, reality TV advertises to a different niche audience than “freak shows” did, but they both appealed to a curious audience that wants to be
86). I like his definition of the word freak show, which is “an elaborate and calculated social construction that utilized performance and fabrication as well as deeply held cultural beliefs” (p. 86). The freak show was a place in which white people could come and recognize their difference and privilege and reaffirm their superiority over individuals who were different from them, who fall into the realm of the ‘other.’ It causes me to wonder that if some individuals saw this as a morally unjust thing, why was it such a popular phenomenon that had a great turn out? And it takes me back to what a friend said, that the only way things sell, is because there is a high demand for it. These freak shows were able to thrive in society, because some individuals needed to know and confirm that they were indeed higher than some other saps out there, whatever they had, they had it better than others. Yes these spectators were being duped into pay high prices to see people with highly exaggerated features, but they did not mind, because why they were there, was to have an opportunity to look at themselves and say Thank God, we are not like them and to reassert their dominance over the
In her 1997 article “Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature” Rosemarie Garland Thomson explores the spectacle that was the 19th and 20th-century freak show. According to Thomson, the American freak show served as a “figure of otherness upon which spectators could displace anxieties and uncertainties about their own identities” (Thomson). The stars of the show were seen as freaks of culture, often crippled by medical deformities that left them on the periphery of society (Thomson). It was these spectacles that gave the American people one collective identity, helping distance themselves from the “anarchic body” that was being paraded. (Thomson). Although the traditional model of the freak show met its death in the 1950s, the Jim Rose Circus managed to successfully reinvent the spectacle for a 21st-century audience.
The first wave of reality TV shows (such as Survivor, The Weakest Link and Dog Eat Dog) played on people's collective anxieties about the new workplace culture whereby nothing is secure. The threat of expulsion and humiliation is what draws people to this style of programming. This was followed by the lifestyle programs, which were the once removed cousins of Reality TV. Naturally no one is entirely satisfied with the way they live so these programs played on people's desires to improve their lifestyle and living conditions. The third wave of Reality shows (such as Joe Millionaire, The Bachelor and For Love or Money) plays with people's fears of falsified relationships; are there ulterior reasons behind a `supposed' loving relationship (such as money)? The main appeal of Reality television is that the viewer experiences raw human emotions like humiliation, deceit and rejection from a removed perspective. The ability to inspect and analyse the happenings of others without being seen takes on a god-like perspective. It invokes the fantasy of having access to all that is hidden.
Will, he describes the workings of television and the ways that television has morphed over the years. According to George F. Will, television is all about imitation. In order to make “good” television people create shows off of other television shows and each time they put a spit on it to make it more and more interesting and shocking. He also argues that we are becoming more and more desensitized. Television shows are increasing the amount of violence, sexuality, and degradation and at the same time people aren’t as easily shocked as they once were. He also warned us by stating, “Imitation is the sincerest form of television” (293). In other words, the idea of imitation is what brings about the added shock factor. For example, in the article was the television show Fear Factor. Fear Factor was created based on the MTV show Jackass. Fear factor takes the basic concept of Jackass and adds different twists, not to mention money, to gain viewers and participants. Another example of television imitation is the NFL versus the XFL. NFL promised that viewers would see more violence and more cheerleaders’ breasts. However, I have mixed feelings on this particular topic. Yes, I feel that reality television can be degrading, humiliating, and even desensitizing, but I also believe it’s the person’s choice to either watch the shows or even be on them. The Hills, for example, is broadcast on MTV late in
Focus Question 1- Why did the Australian Government decide to take the children and what led up to this?
Reality based television has a broad landscape ranging from competitive game-like shows to programs following the daily lives of a group of people. Every major network now has some form of reality programming because the genre’s shows are high in viewership and require low costs for production. The genre is appealing to viewers because it provides them with a first-hand look into the lives of everyday people, which allows them to observe social behavior that helps them determine what is appropriate or not (Tyree, 2011, p. 397). Since the majority of modern reality stars start out as unknowns, frequent viewers of reality programming believed that fame is obtainable if they appear on a popular show (Mendible, 2004). According to Mendible’s evaluation of the genre in the article Humiliation, Subjectivity, and Reality TV, people enjoy reality programs beca...
It is a type of insecurity that one chooses whether or not to reveal to others. No matter how normal or abnormal that person is, they will have skeletons in the closet. Freak Show is a good example of showing how a community filled with so many different people all have a past and something they may not be proud of. For instance, Elsa Mars, a very steadfast independent woman, took on the role as ringleader and mother figure of her freaks. She had a persuasive way that captivated everyone she came in contact with especially when it came to her baggage. Because she had been at the freak show for so many years, and it was always understood that Elsa was normal with no deformity, it came as a shock to her freak family when her baggage was revealed that she had wooden legs. This proved to the freaks that even the most flawless-looking people have
Freak shows, also known as sideshows, were a form of entertainment as early as the 16th century, but did not become commonplace until the late 18th century and early 19th century. As places in England and the United States became more industrialized, the popularity of the display of human oddities and curiosities increased. As sideshows died down in the late 19th century due to ethical issues, many believed that they were a thing of the past. While people no longer go see freaks within the confined boundaries of the freak show, the discourse surrounding ‘freaks’ and ‘freak culture’ still exists. We still continue to have the same fascination with those with bodily differences. The structure of the freak show has carried on to the 21st century in the form of reality television and other forms of entertainment. The separation of normative and non-normative bodies, and the notion of
Cynthia M. Frisby, in her article "Getting Real with Reality TV", analyze reasons why audiences are attracted to reality television programs. According to Frisby, reality television shows have captivate audiences because, apparently people enjoy watching other people 's lives, and they can compare themselves and lives with others. Different people in society see reality tv in different ways: some see it as something to lift it, in either way reality affect society both positively and negatively.
For decades freak shows showcasing live performances has been dead. Public curiosity about physical differences still remains. It takes a new form in viral videos and reality television programs that are broadcasted today. Circuses and freak shows of the twentieth century still remain and favorite form of entertainment. The colorful, celebratory and peculiar esthetic of traveling and live performances were meant to draw in customers, a tactic that is still successful.
Being the one of the most talked about genre in history, it is seen by millions of viewers. It has more ratings than any other kind of show (Breyer 16). From its start, there have been many reality television shows. Shows like The Real World, Survivor, Big Brother, and Jersey Shore. All of these give off a negative portrayal of reality.
Since the very first reality show launching in 1990, the reality genre has rapidly developed to become the most popular experience of television nowadays. A plethora of research has been undertaking in recent years to identify the origin of reality shows’ appeal which concentrated mainly on the psychological side such as the theory of human motivations called ‘16 basic desires’ which linking the most fundamental purposes of human life to aspirations with their attention to media conducted by Reiss and Wiltz (2004) or the element of mastery sense named ‘schadenfreude’ introduced by Hall (2006).
According to Shannon Kelly, reality television has the worst reputation of any type of television programming. Reality tv has gotten bad ratings and reviews due to its violence, profanity, racism, behavior, etc. if these shows had regulations, there wouldn’t be so much negative feedback upon them. “Complaints about the amount of ‘reality’ that is actually a part of reality television, is not the only issue the genre has to contend with.” (Reality TV 62)
One of the main reasons for watching reality TV is to provide people with entertainment. To an extent, the majority of society has a desire to explore what goes on in the world around them. People like watching drama that occurs on public television. “Insults, temper tantrums, selfishness, gross behavior, and plain old stupidity- these are the main ingredients for most of today’s reality TV shows. Guess who is watching them? Millions of viewers just like you” (Cohen). “Viewers cannot seem to get enough of the torture, embarrassment, temptation, and above all, drama of other regular, everyday people being placed in unrealistic settings and manipulated for the world to see” (Pontius). These two quotes state that the reason that the majority of our society watches these shows, is that they are entertained by the supposed reality that is portrayed.
The creation of television broadcasting changed the way the world interacted, making it one of the most successful and important innovation. The Entertainment industry brought Reality TV to America, changing and evolving along with the changes in society. The concept of Reality TV is to show the struggles of real people or actors without scripts, surprising, and terrifying many of its viewers. The television content has changed over the years reflecting the changes in society; the Reality Shows are becoming more obscene, controversial, and competitive.