Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay for royal family
United kingdom constitutional monarchy
United kingdom constitutional monarchy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay for royal family
CHAPTER 3: WILL THE BRITISH PEOPLE GET RID OF THEIR MONARCHY?
Without proper function, how can British monarchy be a role? The question may pop up in our mind when thinking about the continuation of the royal family. It is true that the monarchy seems to be outdated in our modern age, yet it survives through the judgement and scrutiny of Britons. There must be prejudices on its existence of but meanwhile, the monarchy surely brings an edge that they can't deny.
1. For what reasons should we get rid of the monarchy?
On the one hand, the major reason that makes Britons think about getting rid of the royal family is that maintaining the constitutional monarchy costs a huge amount of money. According to Annual Report and Accounts 2016-17 (House
…show more content…
In addition, the monarchy’s existence bears the idea of hierarchy, which is against the idea of a democratic country. In the modern world we are living, people always look for equality, freedom, accountability and transparency, there is no room for privilege and no lifetime supreme head. Without doubt, monarchism is against the belief for a democratic country, where society classes are balanced and all civilians can exercise their power themselves. To reform democratism, the monarchy must be got rid …show more content…
They lend their name and spend a lot of their time for the people, which is really admirable. The fact that the royal family’s participation attract more public attention has helped social contributions and achievements of these organisations gain recognition. Known as the royal, but they actually do serve the country and have day jobs. To illustrate, the Prince of Wales didn’t have a tutor at the Palace but went to schools and college just like any other subjects; after graduating college, he trained as a jet pilot and then joined the Navy. The term “monarchs” may make us think about satisfying, luxurious and carefree lives, but on the contrary, they do show their idea of equality, which is the democratism they are looking
A1. England was run by a Parliament and per history had very limited involvement of the monarchy or direct rule by the king. As well as the colonial legislatures; members were elected by property-holding men and governors were given authority to make decisions on behalf of the king. This system our leadership and how it controls its people the reason many
In today’s world, there are several types of governments that control their countries. There are democracies, dictatorships, republics, monarchies etc. Absolute monarchy was a very common form of government centuries ago. Throughout this time period, many leaders, dictators, monarchs made mistakes that the government looks at today. The abuse and misuse of power by absolute monarchs inexorably led to the rise of modern democracy. This is shown through leaders abusing their powers as absolute monarchs, the unreliability of monarchy, and corrupt governments.
The government within the monarchical society was populated by the aristocracy. It was they who were depended upon for directing the course of governmental affairs. The controls of all co...
Thomas Paine conveyed his dislike for monarchies in many ways throughout “Common Sense”. One of his numerous dislikes was that most monarchs are a hereditary system. Paine’s thoughts over the hereditary system were that they were not valid and would bring evil with it. People that were born into elite existence are very often to be ignorant and unfit. Some people thought that hereditary succession reduced civil wars however there were also the issues, 12 battles
Monarchy is a method where a single person oversees the government. This head of state reigns within bounds of a constitution but still creates a single entity with extreme power. Personal beliefs often override best practices.
Oligarchy is valued above a democracy although they are both ruled by the appetite of the soul. Those within an oligarchy pursue necessary appetites whereas democratic individuals pursue unnecessary appetites. Rulers are present...
The first reason why the House of Lords should be abolished is because it is fundamentally undemocratic. The fact that the peers are unelected and that 92 of them are there because of birthright and not merit makes the House anachronistic and antiquated. A large number of those appointed have also gotten their seat through
...nstead the state consists of rulers who behave like subjects and subjects who behave like rulers. The people begin to desire a strong leader, who will make the difficult decisions for them and bear the consequences: the Democracy has become a Tyranny.
But the good men did not remain good: they began to make money out of that which was the common property of all. And to some such development we may plausibly ascribe the origin of oligarchies, since men made wealth a thing of honour. The next change was to tyrannies, and from tyrannies to democracy. For the struggle to get rich at all costs tended to reduce numbers, and so increased the power of the multitude, who rose up and formed democracies. And now that there has been a further increase in the size of states, one might say that it is hard to avoid having a democratic constitution”
The United Kingdom as one of the remaining monarchies of the world, which head of it, the Queen Elizabeth II, has powers that provide an essential evolution of the country. These powers, are called Royal Prerogative powers. Obviously, British people respect the Royal family and additionally the queen, nevertheless they could have their own beliefs as seen on their references. According to the Royal Prerogative (“RP”), it is definitely the most historically and continuing tradition of Britain. In some situations, circumstances tend to disappear them and replaced them by other recent means. In this essay, it will define the RP and how can preserve the separation of powers. Therefore, it should explain how these powers dying to a democratic environment.
The monarchy symbolizes unity and traditions, which is unique and treasured to the nation. The monarch universally known as head of the Commonwealth, she is voluntarily recognised as the Head of State to 54 independent countries (The British Monarchy, 2013) The Queen to modern Britain, is an icon, who cannot simply be swapped for an elected politician. The British monarchy has played huge importance in British history, which is integral to our national identity. The Queen reined for 61 years and she provides an existing connection between the past, present and future. This is exactly what a politician could not offer to the public; for instance, Tony Blair, prior to 1997 was unknown on a state level, as he had done nothing significant for the British public. The monarchy’s traditions are famous not only in the United Kingdom but throughout the world. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the ruler of sixteen other countries including Britain. Whilst the queen receives many privileges as head of state, it does come at a personal cost. Her privacy is limited as she is consistently scrutinized from t...
The Monarchy is Outdated and Expensive Discuss The phrase "the monarchy is outdated and expensive" immediately congers up a republican view. This immediately is wrong, I think this statement can be true without having to believe in abolishing the monarchy. To agree with the statement could be asking for moderate reform, that the monarchy be kept but its budget be cut, or on the other hand, as most people think, it could call for the formation of a republican Britain. I think the monarchy has uses, even though currently there are flaws in the system that critics can easily pick at, I think the monarchy should be kept, yet I do agree that their self proclaimed status and cost to the country are too high. The monarchy as its stands now could be considered out of date.
Had the Blair reforms never taken place, and no current precedent would have been set, abolishing the House of Lords would be a consideration. Hereditary peers were hardly guaranteed to be experts in any field aside from the life of the upper class, hardly a view that needs further expression in the House of Lords. They crippled the ability of the House to use its expertise, distance from consequences of public scrutiny, and attention to detail to improve bills. The separate judiciary somewhat limits the ability of the House of Lords to exert their soft power of influence, but this may be an even stronger argument for its preservation. A House that can only delay bills and exert power of influence based on legitimacy and authority derived from expertise and not democracy can hardly be argued to be too powerful.
Chapter 8 p. 368-418. Straw, J, ‘Abolish the royal prerogative’, in A. Barnett Ed., Power and the throne: the monarch Debate (1994) London: Vintage, p. 129. Websites http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/briefings/snpc-03861.pdf.
The British Monarchy. “The Queen in Parliament.” The Royal Household. Accessed May 4, 2014. https://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/QueenandGovernment/QueeninParliament.aspx.