Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Syrian crisis easy
Conflicts in the middle east
Essay on syria civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Syrian crisis easy
The Middle East is seldom a tranquil state, but today it is worse than ever. Civil Wars rock countries such as Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen. Incipient conflicts are emerging in Egypt, Turkey, and Sudan. Surrounding countries sit in danger as these wars overflow into neighboring states. Some citizens violently attempt to overthrow their governments while others suffer the devastating brutality of corrupt dictatorships. The Middle East is in a state of chaos. People flee their homelands to escape the ferocity around them. This disorder has brought about the Syrian refugee struggle, which includes millions of Syrians fleeing to other countries. This mayhem raises the question: Should the United States intervene and try to help fight corrupt governments or should we take a step back and stop using money, troops, and resources to fight a war that …show more content…
The United States has been nicknamed the “Policemen of the World” because of how often we intercede, and many think our intervention needs to stop. There is the standard reason that discourages intervening since it isn’t “our war”, and there are more reasons specific to the Middle East. Atrocities are happening all over the world. In the Philippines, Russia, and many African nations, people are fighting and attempting to overthrow their government. If the United States is fighting in the Middle East to settle world conflicts, they aren’t succeeding because there are similar fights everywhere else in the world. Another opposition to the fighting is that our enemy’s enemy is not necessarily our friend. The United States main enemies are Iran and Syria. Some people think that their enemies on our side, and justify that for fighting. The United States also struggles to pay for this. We have a huge national debt, and financing war on the other side of the world would bring in heavy costs. There are clear drawbacks to intervening in these Middle Eastern
The U.S. has been sending troops to over-sea countries to aid the needy, and take certain measures to try to keep our country safe. We want to help the innocent lives, care for the civilians, and want them to be free. We help other countries so that maybe one day they can stand on their own! Power is everything. Power is what controls the world, and without it, you become weak. When we help other countries, that shows how powerful we are, and how strong we are to stand on our on and help! The U.S is considered to be the superpower in the world. Therefore, it should use its power to help other countries in need. Yes, we have a lot of problems with our government,
SUMMARY: The Syrian Civil War between the Syrian government, and the insurgents, as well as the Free Syrian Army has been escalating since early 2011. The United States, and our allies have faced difficulty in sending aid to Syria, and continue to deal with obstacles in sending even basic medications to Syrian civilians. However, the United States and its allies have also contributed to the lack of organization and the disparity in Syria by sending aid and artillery to individuals based only on political connection, and ignoring organization, local alliances, and without a true understanding of the reality of the Syrian localities to best protect the Syrian protestors. The question addressed in this memo will be defining the viable options to be pursued in Syria, how to pursue them, and assessing the most beneficial path of least resistance when offering aid, funds, and artillery to specific groups in the country. The recommendation will be that although the best alternative action item would be to choose a Syrian group with the least oppositional values comparative to the United States to fund, supply with arms, and train; that the United States should do nothing for the time being. Given the physical and financial risk involved with the Syrian Civil War, it would be prudent for the United States to simply observe how the war progresses over the next several months, as well as complete some research to truly understand the state of affairs in local areas of Syria to determine the extent to which the United States could identify a group to provide aid to, as well as the extent to which the United States involvement would be within Syria.
The relations between the U.S and the Middle East are strained at best. The troops deployed in the area face constant threat of attack by a militant group. These broken relations between the U.S and the Middle East started over 50 years ago, with the Iran Hostage Crisis. Root causes of the crisis were many. One was U.S greed over oil in Iran. The second, the coup in Iran organized and funded by the CIA. The U.S dependence on foreign oil is another cause of the problems. Lastly, should the U.S stop moving into other countries sovereign lands and trying to “Prevent the evil of communism”, the nation would not have so many problems around the world. This worry was even shown in Iran (Kinzer, 10). While often blamed on radicals, the strained relations between the U.S and the Middle East are a direct result of a poor US foreign policy.
Taylor Hackford’s “Proof of Life” (2000) displays the positive outcome westernization and a democratic government modeled after the US can have on a developing Latin America. Hackford provides a glimpse of what he postulates to be the solution for Latin America’s unstable governments and economies. Hackford commends the US’s efforts to intervene in Latin American affairs. With the help of the US, Latin American can modernize with technological innovation and increase their globalization efforts with foreign trade; however, US intrusion in Latin America has only benefited the US. Tony Gilroy was chosen to write the script. Russell Crowe, Meg Ryan and David Morse were selected to star in “Proof of Life”.
The role of the United States is very important, and the United States has quite an image to keep up. Sometimes the United States does not know what the right decision is, and until they try one of there choices they will not know what the right or wrong decision is. It is not the United States responsibility to make peace in a country at civil war.
In some cases this intervention in other countries could cause the situation to become far worse. In Darfur two rebel movements took up arms against the Sudanese government over a lack of protection from invading nomads and the marginalization of the area. “Saddam responded to the domestic uprisings with extreme brutality, killing perhaps 20,000 Kurds and 30,000-60,000 Shiites, many of them civilians” (Valentino). An intervention of Saddam’s brutality was attempted and after 100 hours the US withdrew forces. The intervention was entirely unsuccessful, even with foreign aid. And in retribution Saddam brutally killed tens of thousands of people, many of which were
I believe that there is no clear-cut position as to whether we should be Interventionist or Isolationist. It all comes down to circumstances. Almost every conflict the United States had been involved in has been about economics and what our country can gain. We have been one of the world’s greatest powers since the early 1900’s, mainly because of colonialization and domination of world economy.
America is currently involved a conflict in the Middle East. The United States is trying to stop the terrorism problem in nonconforming nations. America is currently involved a conflict in the Middle East. The United States is trying to stop the terrorism problem in nonconforming nations. The tactics that the United States is using is hurting many civilians and is slowing the process of rebuilding their government.
Every day the news across the world reports that soldiers are dying in the middle east in the attempt to solidify their society.
The “Trojan Horse” exists in humanitarian intervention as it is mixed with considerations of national interest, such as state influence, national power, prestige and access to potential oil supplies. For example, in Syria and Sri Lanka, the responsibility to protect norm has not done very little to protect populations within states. The author notes that the international community's feeble responsibility on the Darfur’s crisis has failed to recognize the role of the “responsibility to protect.” The West’s disinclination to intervene in Darfur raises skepticism about the West’s humanitarian intervention techniques, especially after the invasion of Iraq and western strategic interests in Sudan. Nevertheless, the notion of the responsibility to protect is important in the protection of human rights as it seeks to confront atrocity committed by states through prevention, protection or
When we speak about policies in the middle east there are many options to choose from. But, all of these options have positive and negative effects. Overall I think the best option for the United States would be to step back from the Middle East. Stepping back has a handful of positive effects on The United States and its citizens. A few of those things would be not having to worry about controlling another country. We could use the money spent over there to fund research on other natural resources. Stepping back from the Middle East could bring some of our troops home. This could be both positive and negative depending on how you look at it. I'd like to take this topic a little further into detail with my following reasons.
The Syrian Civil War is a good example of world leaders playing by the rules of realism. The civil war began in March of 2011 as part of the Arab Spring, and by July of 2012 17,000 have died and another 170,000 fled the country (Almond). The United Nations Security Council in February of 2012 had tried t...
When outside powers here of cross-cultural conflicts they are damned if they don’t get involved and damned if they do is the popular way of looking at this issue but this also is super one sided like Huntington’s argument, Samantha Power an ambassador to the United Nations from the US would have us rather look at the loss of life rather then political nonsense. In her book A Problem From Hell, Power’s write a quotes from Ambassador Morgenthau with saying that “unless it directly affected America lives or American interests, it was outside the concern of the American government.” as a way to show how outside powers look at these conflicts . She argues that more international aid and presences during these conflicts is need, not aid and presences that would actually be helpful . Power’s writes how “the UN security council pointed finger at the main aggressors, imposed economic sanctions, deployed peacekeepers, and helped deliver humanitarian aid,” and all that well and good but during these types of conflict the type of aid needed in troops on the ground to help prevent further violence . She talks a lot about how international aid
Why should the United States continue helping this Middle Eastern conflict? It is because the ambassadors of each country truly do not get along with one another. The following quotes
It is for this true reason that the US remains in the Middle East. They wish to exercise control in the region, to not simply restore peace in a concentrated conflict zone, but rather to protect their national interests of maintaining their alliances in the Middle East to ensure the trade routes of oil remain in tact.