Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of plastic in the ocean
Consequences of plastic in the ocean
Consequences of plastic in the ocean
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of plastic in the ocean
Remember when you went to the movies and got one of those large cups of Coca Cola and watched the newest release? Well now some states are trying to get rid of those large soda cups. The government is intervening with public health, and this should not be allowed. The government, whether this be the federal or state, should not intervene in public health decisions. Part of this has to do with the importance of having too much soda. The state governments have too many other things to deal with than people drinking large sodas. For example, a big topic today is plastics in the ocean. According to Perseus-net, as many as one hundred thousand marine animals are killed each year by plastics in the ocean. Also on that site, one million birds die a year from plastics you and I use daily. According to CNN, only twenty five thousand citizens die a year from overuse of soda. Yes this is still a large amount of citizens, but there are more than a million animals being killed per year by plastics, versus our twenty five thousand, let that sink in for a moment. Thus, the government has bigger problems to deal with. …show more content…
According to CNBC, Coca Cola made just under ten million dollars this year. Without larger soda cups, Coca Cola will make a much lesser amount of money, just under seven and half million. Big soda companies like Coke and Pepsi could lose up to three million dollars. That means the people working at the big plants will be payed a much lesser amount. According to CNBC, there are just over one hundred and twenty thousand people working for Coca Cola. Also, the companies that sell the soda product would get paid less, like workers at movie theaters. The population would not be the only people angry about the law, companies would be angry as
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
The New York Soda Ban is a step in the wrong direction and efforts should be put towards making life better, rather than focusing on a movement that will have little to no effect. Realize that I am not stating the soda should be drank, because even I know that soda is harmful towards the body and is one of the leading causes of obesity. However, I believe that the soda ban will have little effect and that time and money should be applied somewhere where the act would have an effect of making life better. The reason I do not believe this ban will do as much good as stated, is because the ban is flawed. This brings me to my first point, which is, one cup of boysenberry juice has 256 grams of sugar, equaling to 225 calories. One cup of Cola only
o Drinks high in sugar were linked to obesity, and tied to 180,000 deaths each year across the globe - Mexico (30% adult obesity), soda is a major source of sugar for Mexicans, and high-energy beverage consumption increased 2x addiction” are currently being studied with rats right now, with preliminary conclusions that the criteria for substance dependence is very similar to food dependence criteria - Soda consumption has declined since the mid-2000s Technological – There is increased research and development in the food and beverage industry, especially regarding healthier, “better for you” products that don’t sacrifice taste - Coca-Cola has released commercials that emphasize its “healthier” products, and new R&D - Social media has risen as an outlet for advertising, changing the way consumers view ad messages, and the way consumers view Average customer – likely supportive, but range from supportive to marginal 2. Government – Generally non-supportive, but this can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Municipal – non-supportive, especially New York City b. Provincial/State level – Mississippi would be considered supportive c. Federal – currently in the marginal stage, but this could change i. United States Department of Agriculture: marginal with the potential to become non-supportive 3. Competitors – Non-supportive, they don’t want to see PepsiCo succeed so that they can potentially take over their share of the market.
Pratt, Katherine. "A Constructive Critique Of Public Health Arguments For Antiobesity Soda Taxes And Food Taxes." Tulane Law Review 87.1 (2012): 73-140. Academic Search Complete. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
The New York soda ban would not prove to be effective because it is will bring about a rebellious reaction in some people, it does not include supermarkets, vending machine and convenience stores and refills which means people can go around it and educating people should be the first step towards improvement in their lifestyle.
This article is talking about a mayor banning beverages larger than 16 oz. at restaurants, sports arenas and movie theaters. The reason this mayor wants to ban large sodas is because he is afraid for all of New York’s health. That’s a good thing because a lot of us don’t know what we drink and eat most of the time. We just eat our food we don’t even bother to look what’s really in side such as calories, fats and oils in our food. This Mayor is doing New York a huge favor by banning large sodas. He’s helping everyone in New York about their health but people of New York doesn’t see that. There are people who are trying to not let him pass this law because some of them probably drink 16 oz. every day of once a week or twice a week or even more.
Harold Goldstein and Jennifer Richard, California’s Soda Tax: Helping Cash Strapped Communities Protect Children’s Health, A Publication of the California Center for Public Health Advocacy, www.publichealthadvocacy.org. April 2011
In the past couple years people all around the nation, whether it's in New York City or an 8th Grade classroom in Michigan, people have been pressed with the question, whether the New York Soda Ban, is a good thing, improving health, or if there is a larger issue. Is this decision showing evidence of the Government interfering with our basic civil liberties?
The article, Soda Consumption Does Not Equal Obesity, states that soda is not the only reason people are obese. When people are more active, they are less likely to have an obesity-related illness. Being active plays an important role because people are constantly burning fat, which makes it less likely for them to be overweight or obese. Economists from Emory University declare that soft drinks do not have a big impact on weight. The reason was that when untaxed, soft drinks only represent 7% of a soda drinker’s calorie intake. An article released by the National Association of Convenience Stores states that Virginia and Arkansas are currently taxing soda. “Just look at West Virginia and Arkansas, two states currently taxing soft drinks. Those two states have some of the highest obesity rates in the country,” said Muhart Kent. If taxing soda did not affect obesity in those two states, then it will not affect obesity in any
I do not think the soda ban would have worked because all it was only restricting a very small portion of businesses that sell sodas. While sodas may be a large contributor to the US obesity epidemic there are many other sources of sugar-laden foods and drinks such as fast food meals, energy drinks, processed juices, and sports drinks.
Every human being has the right to how they should live their lives, and the freedom to make their own choices. Yet in reality, many people are constricted from those rights. One of them being because of the implementation of the soda ban-a restriction that stops people from consuming large portions of sugar in sodas. Although some may argue that the limitations helps the public, it is an awful idea because it puts restrictions on a person’s life, has too many unreasonable loopholes, and it doesn’t stop people from digesting high intakes of sugar.
Considering individuals are becoming more health conscious it would be beneficial for Coca Cola to continue producing even more healthy products. Producing healthier drinks could potentially get their products back in schools. Researching into cheaper materials as well as environmentally friendly alternatives to plastic would be another recommendation. The main concern for Coca Cola is water supply. Without water Coca Cola would not be able to stay in business. It is recommended for Coca Cola to reduce the amount of water it uses. They have already begun a goal to improve water use. “Our 2020 goal is aggressive and builds on the 21.4% water efficiency improvement we’ve made since 2004. We expect to increasingly assess not just the quantity of the water used to grow our product ingredients, but the impact of that use as well” (Improving,
The New York City mayor, Michael Bloomberg, came up with an idea ban the larger 16oz soda in order to stop the rising obesity rate and improve the overall health of the residents. Studies show that more than half of the adults residing in New York City are either overweight or obese. These statistics are what gave Mayor Bloomberg the idea to ban the soda. The soda ban should be done because it will help stop the rising obesity rate and improve the overall health of the residents. The health of others is very important and it should not be diminished by something that can be stopped.
At best, we might see a temporary decrease in total soda consumption but nothing substantial enough to cause a lasting change in people’s habits. Instead, we must properly educate people regarding the harm large amounts of soda. Unless we entirely ban the sales of any and all kinds of soda, people will always be able to inflict substantial harm to themselves through poor dietary choices, because the they have the final say. Therefore, individuals themselves must decide what is best, and our efforts should be focused on informing them about the consequences. It is known that educated people are less likely to drink soda, as shown on the graph by Julia Belluz.
Have you ever thought how much soda you consume and how bad it can be for you? Many people will drink soda instead of water, simply because it tastes better. The government should limit the intake of sugary beverages because it can lead to many different problems such as heart disease, obesity, and overall it is an unhealthy life-style. “The average person consumes almost 100lbs of sugar a year, with the single biggest source being soda.” A sugary beverage occasionally would be ok, but drinking it every day would cause problems for you overtime. People drink, more soda than they do water. People should be consuming at least eight 8-ounce glasses a day. Mostly no one will drink that amount of water a day. In today’s society, it can be easy to grab a soda for one dollar and carry on. They may taste better but they are not better for your health. “Sugary drinks include soda, fruit punch, lemonade, and other “aides” sweetened powdered drinks, and sports energy drinks.”