Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conceptual framework on the impact of extracurricular activities
Importance of extracurricular activities in academic performance
Importance of money over education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
People should not pay kids for grades. There would be less money for things like field trips and other school activities. In addition, money can’t buy smarts, motivation or school success. And they would not because they are interested in learning, they would be only be learning because they are interested in earning money. People should remember that paying kids for grades won’t help their motivation or school success now and it surely won’t help when they go to college and aren’t paid for their grades. This is an important topic because many people don’t understand and think that kids should be paid for their grades. The significance of my claim is that 66% of people said that kids should be able to be paid for their grades and that they need to do more research on this topic.
If students were paid for grades, there would be less money for field trips and other school activities. Many of these students aren’t on track to graduate from high school, much less go on to college. New York City’s Spark program (now in its second year), awards fourth- and seventh-graders cash for high achievement on a series of math and reading tests throughout the year. A fourth-grader can earn up to $250 a year, while a seventh-grader can earn up to $500 (Greatschools Staff,
…show more content…
2016). This is an example of how paying students for school would work. When asked how school field trips are financed, the largest percentage of respondents selected the option that indicated that parents are asked to pay part or all of the cost of trips (districts are required to lower the fee for needy families). About 28 percent of respondents noted that the district pays the entire cost of trips from the budget, while another 28 percent said that the district gets funding for field trips from outside sources, such as an education foundation (School Board Notes, 2012). This means that, with most schools paying partly for each person and the parents paying the rest, they would not be able to pay at all for each person, they would have parents/families pay it all. At one elementary school, there were about 5 classes per grade, with about 30 students in each class, meaning there were about 150 students per grade. Buses are about 24 seats, and if they put three students in each seat, plus chaperones and teachers, they would need about 3 buses. Bus rentals cost about $240 including chaperones and teachers. Schools normally do about three field trips per year for each grade, which, according to this, would cost about $720 per grade. This cost doesn’t count the actual ticket, so it would be very hard to pay for buses and the tickets and then add in paying the students as well as teachers. Money can’t buy smarts, motivation, or school success.
Barbara Marinak, an assistant professor of education at Penn State University, says the research on monetary rewards is quite clear: They don’t work. “Any type of ‘extrinsic’ reward, by and large, undermines motivation,” she told National Public Radio last year (Flannery, 2015). As said by Barbara Marinak, if they are rewarded, they are less motivated. The difference? Simply playing kids for good grades or test scores doesn’t actually give them any more skills, Fryer theorized. The system needs to be more complicated – and more specific to the needs of children – to be effective (Flannery, 2015). Just giving them money for grades won’t make them any
smarter. Students would not go to school because they are interested in learning, but instead they want to have the chance to earn money. All of the positives about having a part-time job have one big caveat. Students cannot usually be employed more than 20 hours per week or their grades begin to suffer, they do less homework, and they are more likely to drop out (Gisler & Eberts, 2016). Your grades could suffer more if you were without a job than if you had a job during school, however, the busier you are, the more focused you become. Working really makes you more structured; you have a lot of things to do in a short amount of time, so it’s important to keep up with it all (Laskowski, 2009). So, if they got paid for grades and don’t go for a job, you won’t be structured as if you had a job. Many people believe that being paid for grades would make kids strive to do more. "It's an ego booster in terms of self-worth. When they get the checks, there's that competitiveness -- 'Oh, I'm going to get more money than you next time' -- so it's something that excites them," (Mills, 2009). Why would they want students to be competitive with their grades? At most schools, they don’t even want you to show, or tell people what your grades and test scores are. Though it is true information, why would they encourage students to tell each other how much money their grades are worth? People should not pay kids for grades. There would be less money for things like field trips and other school activities. Also, money can’t buy smarts, motivation or school success. And they would not learn the same as if they were there to learn, not there for money. People should remember that paying kids for grades won’t help their motivation or school success now and it surely won’t help when they go to college and aren’t paid for their grades. This is an important topic because many people don’t understand and think that kids should be paid for their good grades. The significance of my claim is that 66% of people said that kids should be able to be paid for their grades and that they need to do more research on this topic.
The teachers use a currency in order to reward the children in a way of “cash” rewards. Nearly 100% of the students in the school are living in poverty at home, are African-American, and are without a preschool education. Older students have been required to fill out applications with references for classroom jobs, followed by attending an interview. Although many adults feel the children are just being trained as robots, principals have explained it is simply to teach students that they have an opportunity to succeed, regardless of their past. Children at these schools are constantly being “incentivized”, which is quite common in America, making this situation
In “Grades and Money,” Steven Vogel makes it clear that he is disappointed and frustrated with what grades have become. He believes that grades have become commoditized and that students’ grades suffer because of their relation with money. Vogel also believes that students no longer take any risk with their education. I agree with Vogel that grades are being equated to money by students, that students’ work suffers because of grades, and that students no longer take risks in their educational process.
The use of incentives are debatable whether or not they should be used or not, however it is proven that in some cases it does work. With teenagers if a teacher says that we will get a grade boost by donating money, or time it it PROVEN (word choice) that we will feel more obligated to participate knowing that it will in some way benefit us. As much as we are being selfish and only thinking about how the outcome will benefit us, we still are committing a good deed. And should’t it just be about what the outcome is rather what gets you to the outcome. In the long run, you still end up helping and being kind even though you are doing it only because of the incentive. An incentive is defined as a th...
“Beginning in 2007, his [Roland Fryer Jr.] project paid out $6.3 million to students in 261 urban schools...from low-income families” (Sandel 52). As a result, paying students for good grades has an impact on many people, not only students but teachers as well. Students should be paid for good grades because they will be able to save the money they earn for the future, it will motivate them to do well in school, and it will increase their scores on AP exams. With the money that students earn for their good grades, they can save it for their future. According to student Brett Upperman, “‘Kids need money so we can save it for college.
To begin, with, school should not pay students for good grades because they are constrained to earn good grades. Evidence from the NEA article claims, “Many teachers also say paying students for grades leads to practical problems in their classroom, including pressure to inflate grades.” This leads to kids trying to get good grades, which can cause stress because if they have one dreadful grade, they will worry a lot about not getting as much money. The effect of this is students will be distressed about grades that they won’t have any fun and won’t rest their brains. Clearly, students are pressured to earn good grades if they are getting
Giving students a grade that they have not earned hinders the youth’s future educational success. A number of schools are no longer giving a grade of zero on assignments, tests, and exams completed by students. While other school districts continue to give students the grade that is adequate for the work they have done or have not completed. Giving students the grade that equals their work is designed to show students where they need to improve. Many school boards want to stop giving out zeros for work that hasn’t been turned in and give a grade that rages around the “D” area keeping children from falling behind in their classes. By allowing student to pass through the school system the educational board is raising their graduation and success
In certain instances, schools won’t allow a child to get lower than a “C” average. We are handing out degrees to these children without them even being aware of it. I’ve had some of my own friends who did not pass all their required classes in middle school and still were allowed to receive their high school diploma on graduation day. This national trend needs to be reversed and it starts with allowing our children to receive awards with no worth. Once children accept the fact that life is not always fair, they will be better prepared to face the challenges and obstacles ahead in the real
Some people believe merit pay creates competition and favoritism. They seem to think school systems will pay some teachers more than others and create a “battle” for money. In Merit Pay: Good for Teachers? By Gary Drevitch, one interviewee states, “I know it’s worked in some places, but I shudder at the idea of teachers being in competition with each other.” None of these problems will occur if school districts implement a successful, unbiased system. Another issue society presents when it comes to merit pay comprises of differentiating a “good” teacher from a “bad” teacher. School districts can easily evaluate a teacher’s ability to educate students by the work teachers put into helping students. Student’s reactions to a teacher’s class can also help evaluate teachers. More often than not, students will love a class where the teacher clearly demonstrates lessons, explain procedures, and adds elements of fun. On the other hand, students typically dislike classes where the teacher only comes in for a paycheck. This attitude is displayed by their lackadaisical teaching style. Other people argue that money should not be the reason why people go into teaching. Richard Barbieri, author of Merit Pay? argues that money is not an external motivator, but the substance of a teacher’s motivation. Financial incentives will cause employees to work harder
In 2010, Alyssa faced one of the horrors students face: bringing home a bad report card. Afraid of her parents’ reaction, the girl hid her report card to avoid showing the grim 76, for she, like other kids, does not want to be grounded for it. However, should students feel pressured to get a high grade? Should kids fear getting a bad grade? In reality, no parent should punish their children because of a “bad” grade; such action is detrimental to the students’ health and relationships. There is a more healthful, efficient way to improve grades, although, in reality grades are insignificant in today’s society.
All children today receive participation awards just for trying. However, this has a few substantial drawbacks. For instance, Betty Berdan from The New York Times claims that “When awards are handed out like candy to every child who participates, they diminish in value” (Berdan). This mean the talented kids have less incentive to do their best and don't feel like they have accomplished a large goal. Kids will grow up thinking
This may result in the child expecting a reward for jobs that are not done, or that are subpar to his best ability. The superior weakness to handing out participation trophies is that the child that works harder, works longer, and works every day to get better recieves not more recognition than the child who simply shows up for games. The hardworking child deserves to be recognized for more than just
Recent studies have shown that rewarding children simply for participating can make them narcissistic and unmotivated. It can also have biological impacts. “If you constantly reward a kid, you spoil them, and you don’t build a capacity for them to be resilient to frustration,” says C. Robert Cloninger, a doctor at Washington University. Parents may also be part of the problem. They may be giving their children a large self- worth without even noticing it (Website #2).
Students should be paid for having good grades. According to Psychology Today, the United States has fallen behind other nations in education. In addition to this, approximately one in four students in the U.S. drops out of school before graduation. The main reason for this is that students have little to no motivation. Students are either bored with school, or they are distracted by the other things that go on in their lives such as sports, jobs, friends and their own family life.
In conclusion, students should be paid to do well in school because it has many benefits to the student. Those benefits include motivation to get good grades, the money would help the student financially, and the student would learn how to manage their money more effectively. School is a big part of every person’s life, so it should be more rewarding to the
We have to admit that humans often need incentives. For most people, money is a driving force which can inspire them to make progress (Barbieri, 52). If by performing better, you could earn more money, I think most people would gladly perform well and strive to achieve better results. Teachers are also human beings, and the vast majority of them would feel the same. Higher wages can increase the enthusiasm and motivation of teachers. At the same time, merit pay can improve teachers’ motivation, not only because of the money, but also because of a sense of accomplishment (Honawar and Olson, 26-27). When a teacher, through his or her own careful research of teaching strategies, passion, and devotion to teaching, help his or her students get better grades and is also rewarded by the schools, he or she will be filled with a sense of purpose. This will make that teacher know his or her effort is worth it, and in following lessons he or she would strive to expend even more energy and time to improving his or her teaching level and quality. Meanwhile, outstanding teachers will also become role models for other teachers who do not get bonuses. In this case, in a school, it will form a healthy competition among teachers. Everyone will be more diligent and strive to improve the level and quality of their