Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Determining decision making
Decision making
Determining decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Determining decision making
I. List as many ethical issues as possible
1. Should the pilots of the Boeing 757 not have reported their flight level after ascending?
It is morally wrong. The reason is that if the air controller was not informed of the flight level, he could fail to perceive the potential collision, thus leading to fatal harm to lots of people. In nature, this action lead to potential fatal harm.
2. Should a traffic controller have been on break on a night shift and left his or her colleague "in charge of two navigation stations" (2)?
It is morally wrong. The reason is that the preoccupation of his or her colleague could make the controller unaware of the catastrophic collision and cause many people their lives. In nature, this action lead to potential
…show more content…
fatal harm. 3. Should an air traffic controller have been "in charge of two navigation stations" on a night shift (2)? It is morally wrong. Similarly, the reason is that the preoccupation of an air traffic controller could lead to a catastrophic collision and kill many people. In nature, this action may cause potential fatal harm. 4.
Should an air traffic controller have been responsible for multiple navigation stations under any circumstance?
As a layman, this question is really hard to say. I would like to regard this action as morally wrong since chances are that this action may put others' lives in danger. In essence, taking safety into account, this action could be morally wrong.
5. Should the air traffic control system to have inadequate employees on duty on a night shift?
It's morally wrong. In this case, if there were three employees on duty on that night, no one would need to be in charge of multiple navigation stations and they would also have enough break, thus preventing the tragedy from happening to some extent. I think it's morally wrong for the air traffic control system to put inadequate employees on duty.
6. Should the technicians turn the main telephone system down for maintenance without informing the controllers of the condition of the backup telephone system?
It is morally wrong. The telephone systems are indispensable to "communicate with nearby airport" (2). If the controller had no idea that the backup system was down and that the urgent information was blocked, many people may lose their lives. In essence, this action may cause
…show more content…
harm. 7. Should the technicians turn the main telephone system down for maintenance without checking the condition of the backup telephone system? It's morally wrong.
The failure of the telephone systems would block the communication between the pilots and the controllers, which put many people in hazard. In nature, this inconsiderate and irresponsible action may kill people.
8. Might an air traffic controller have been unaware that the telephone system was down and that the normal communication was blocked when he was on duty?
It is morally wrong. As for a responsible controller, the first thing he should do is to make sure that the telephone system work well. If he realized that the telephone system had no reply for a long time, he should contact the technicians immediately. In nature, an air traffic controller being ignorant of the conditions of the equipment used may put others in danger.
9. Should Swiss Air Traffic Control System have left the short-term conflict alert (STCA) be down?
It is morally wrong. Under urgent circumstances, the STCA could warn the controller of the potential danger and prevent the tragedies. In nature, turning off the device could put other people's life in danger.
10. Should a pilot not obeyed the order of the traffic collision and avoidance system (TCAS) but turned to an air traffic controller for help when the dangerous collision was
urgent? It is morally right. In case of machine failure, the pilots should ask the control center for approvals before following the TCAS's orders. In nature, this action is morally right because of safety concern. 11. Should an air traffic controller not have been informed of the information of the traffic collision and avoidance system (TCAS)? It is morally wrong. If the controller have no idea of the order of the TCAS in detail, conflicting orders could lead to tragedies and deprive people of their lives. In nature, this action might kill people. 12. Should the pilots receiving TCAS alert have reported the information to the air traffic controller in detail? It's morally right. This action could effectively prevent the air traffic controller from giving an opposite instruction to the TCAS. In essence, it could save many people's lives. 13. Might the designers of TCAS have figured the ways of sending the urgent alarm to the Traffic Control Center? It is morally right. Though this technical problem might be challenging, it might save a lot of people their lives in essence. 2. Choose the most important one As far as I am concerned, I will choose this as the most significant issue-- "Should an air traffic controller have been in charge of multiple navigation stations?" Explanation: In this case, if the controller was responsible for only one navigation, he could be more concentrated and be aware of the potential collision. If the controller warned the pilots of the collision and instructed them to ascend or descend to different flight levels in time, the tragedy would not happen in the first place. Thus, from my perspective, this is the most contributing factors leading to the Uberlingen case. 3. List facts that would help to resolve the most important issue/answer the question Material Factors 1. The main and backup telephone systems were both not working. 2. The alerting information of TCAS "was not relayed to the air traffic controller" (3). Facts Regarding Individuals 3. The air traffic controller on duty, Nielsen, was "in charge of two navigation stations", which made his attention "divided between them" (2, 2). 4. The pilots of 757 didn't report their new flight level to Nielsen after ascending. 5. The pilots of 154 didn't report to Nielsen that the TCAS directed 154 to descend to flight level. 6. Nielsen gave the pilots of 154 the instruction that was the opposite of the instruction received from the TCAS. Facts Regarding Organizations 7. Two air traffic controllers were on duty that night. 8. The Russian training instructed the pilots to "follow the directions of air traffic controllers" (3). List of the relevant missing facts 1. In the texture, it hasn't mentioned whether the air traffic control system have corresponding policies that allowed its controllers to be on break in turns on a night shift. 2. It hasn't mentioned how many navigation systems could an air traffic controller be in charge of based on the laws and regulations. 3. It hasn't mentioned why the pilots of 757 failed to inform Nielsen of the new flight level. 4. Make reasonable assumptions regarding missing facts, including brief justifications for your assumptions. 1. In the texture, it hasn't mentioned whether the air traffic control system have corresponding policies that allowed its controllers to be on break in turns on a night shift. Assumptions: a. Due to safety concern, the air traffic control system had prohibited its employees from taking break on a night shift. b. The air traffic control system had allowed its employees to take a nap on a night shift for the sake of its employees' health. But an air traffic controllers was not allowed to monitor multiple navigation systems in case of the potential danger. c. The air traffic control system had allowed its employees to take a nap on a night shift for the sake of its employees' health. Also, an air traffic controllers was allowed to monitor multiple navigation systems. 2. It hasn't mentioned how many navigation systems could an air traffic controller be in charge of based on the laws and regulations. Assumptions: a. One. The laws and regulations in Swiss banned controllers from being in charge of multiple navigation systems because the preoccupation of an air traffic controller could lead to potential air crash. b. Multiple. The human resource might be precious in Swiss and the air traffic control system didn't have enough people to work controllers. Thus, the air traffic controllers were allowed to be in charge of multiple navigation systems at the same time. 3. It hasn't mentioned why the pilots of 757 failed to inform Nielsen of the new flight level. Assumptions: a. The pilots of 757 "reported its ascent" but the radio frequency interference blocked that information (2). b. The pilots of 757 forgot to report its new flight level. 5. Clarify the use of any potentially ambiguous terminology you've used so far
As pointed out by Meagher JA in Marien v Gardiner it is not possible that the driver could foresee and react to any event that could take place within the area surrounding the vehicle. Therefore, the driver could not have breached his duty of care in any circumstance that an object by chance is to collide with a vehicle on the road.
Lt. Wells was a member of the Law Enforcement Stops and Safety Subcommittee. This committee is volunteer-based and works under the financial support of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. It is affiliated with the International Association of Chiefs of Police.
I think they did the right thing by charging him with manslaughter. His actions on the fire were not acceptable, he was not acting like a IC and was not doing his job at all. He killed four people because his actions and most likely his low level of training. If they had the correct PPE and working Equipment and Knew to follow the ten standard firefighting orders and the eighteen watch out situations they most likely would of all survived and never been in that situation of deploying there shelters.
The vehicle and A/C were left on for the juvenile backseat passenger. I then advised Officec. Peal to respond to the scene for assistance. Shortly after, Ofc. Peal arrived on scene.
AS FOR OFFICER SAFETY, THIS CONCERNS ME WITH PTL CARLISLE. ON JAN. 1, 2017, WHILE CONDUCTING A CHAPTER 20 CHECKPOINT I NOTICED SEVERAL ISSUES WITH THE WAY PTL CARLISLE WAS APPROACHING VEHICLES AND HOW HE WAS INTERACTING WITH THE DRIVERS. PTL SMITH, ALONG WITH MYSELF, SPOKE WITH PTL CARLISLE ABOUT WHAT HE WAS DOING AND WHAT NEEDED TO BE CHANGED IN ORDER TO APPROACH THE CAR IN A SAFER MANNER. SHORTLY THERE AFTER (ON JAN. 9 2017, NIGHT SHIFT) I WATCHED AS PTL. CARLISLE APPROACHED A CAR DURING A VEHICLE STOP TO WHICH HE DID NOT HAVE HIS FLASHLIGHT AVAILABLE AS WELL AS PUTTING HIMSELF IN HARMS WAY BY STANDING DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE DRIVER’S SIDE WINDOW WITH NO FLASHLIGHT AND HIS GUN HAND ON THE ROOF OF THE CAR. AFTER THIS TRAFFIC STOP WAS CLEARED, I AGAIN SPOKE WITH PTL CARLISLE ABOUT THE INCIDENT AND ADVISED HIM LATER IN THE NIGHT I WOULD BE DOING MOCK TRAFFIC STOPS WITH HIM TO POINT OUT WHAT HE NEEDED TO CHANGE. LATER THAT EVENING PTL SMITH ALONG WITH MYSELF RAN PTL CARLISLE THROUGH SEVERAL DIFFERENT SCENERIO BASED TRAFFIC STOPS. PTL CARLISLE SEEMED TO PICK UP QUICKLY ON WHAT WE WERE SHOWING HIM AND WAS VERY ACCEPTABLE TO ANY INFORMATION WE HAD TO OFFER. ANOTHER AREA THAT PTL CARLISLE NEEDS TO
"Get me the police". Prior to the rotary dial many people all over the country had to wait for operator assistance when placing a phone call. Creating an emergency number was a sufficient way of connecting to an emergency personnel’s. Before the emergency number was established the caller dependency for an emergency contact was the operator. The caller would have to wait for assistance and then tell the operator the number of whom they wish to be connected to. In case of emergency the caller could simply reply with the emergency service name and get help. In 1967, the President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice suggested that a "particular number be established" generally for exposure of emergency situations. As a result of the colossal attention in this concern the President's Commission on Civil Disorders turned to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for a clarification. In November of 1967 FCC met with the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) to find a way of establishing a universal emergency number that may possibly be implemented promptly. Later congress passed a law identifying 9-1-1 to be the standard emergency contact number for the United States of America. By the end of the 20th century nearly 93% of the U.S was covered with some type of 9-1-1 service. So, whenever there are an emergency occurring citizen’ young and old have access to the universal emergency number. This is a telephone number to be used for immediate access to help and assistance when an accident or serious problem occurs. Children can be taught to dial 9-1-1 when life and/or property are in immediate danger. In addition to, being in danger it defeats the purpose of having an emergency number.
Although that gives the report a sometimes odd tone, defending a system that it admits failed badly, it also provides for some of the document's most evident soul-searching. One passage in particular warns of the consequences when police let down their guard. "Essentially, many of the problems found by this [Board of Inquiry] boil down to people failing to do their jobs with a high level of consistency and integrity," the report states. "Unfortunately, we found this to be true at all levels of the organization, including top managers, first-line supervisors and line personnel. Clearly, pride in one's work and a commitment to do things correctly the first time seems to have
The negative effect of following deontology ethics in this case would be the killing of all those people. It’s not necessarily your fault, but you still had the chance to stop it from happening. Most people would think that stopping the missile is the best way to go morally, and that’s understandable. But from the point of view of a strict deontologist, you would have no choice but to let it happen.
They took off without any problems. The weather was pleasant and they were fully equipped and ready. Until 3:45 p.m., the tower operators in Fort Lauderdale received a bizarre message from the flight leader, Lt. Charles Taylor. Lt. Taylor reported that they could not see land and that they were off-course. He also reported that they were lost. Baffled, the tower operators told Lieutenant Taylor to go westward, but he answered that they did not know which way west was.
The first incident I came across was the traffic stop. A man was pulled over for speeding 10 miles per hour above the posted speed limit in a residential area. I estimated he was going about 36 miles per hour when the posted speed limit was actually 25 miles per hour. After running his license plate, he had no previous violations, no records for a stolen car, and he had valid registration and emissions for the vehicle. The logo on his uniform states, “We’re always on time”, hinted to me as the reason for the driver to be speeding. After questioning him, the story checks out to be true and he stated that his supervisor had strict rules about being at work on time. If in fact he violates that rule he could lose his job. He sounded very sincere and apologetic for knowing he went over the speed limit. He has no prior violations on file. Given the circumstances, my gut reaction is to let him off with a warning. I believe it will be a wake-up call for the driver to use more caution in the future. The driver was not a dangerous threat nor was he driving recklessly on the roadway.
It was the afternoon of July 25, 2000. One hundred passengers, most of them German, boarded the Concorde Air France Flight 4590. This was a trip of a lifetime for many people, as Concorde was restricted to the wealthy class of people. The excitement in people was cut short by the unfortunate delay in flight, because of maintenance in one of its engines. The passengers boarded the plane a couple of hours after the scheduled time. Finally, it was cleared for taxi on runway 26-Right. The pilots lined the aircraft parallel to the runway. A tragic accident, however, was about to befall.
In 2005 in the UK 13 deaths and over 400 injuries were attributed to accidents where drivers were using cell phones, deaths which could have possibly been avoided. There are 4 main reasons for banning cell phones at the wheel:
False alarm: our fuel is wasted and our pilots's time is also wasted and our aircrafts become less ready for the next attacks.
The workers and those boarding the plan were present; however, the pilot and staff were
NET failed to recognize or react to either situation. It is imperative to understand that NET was liable for its employees but the employees, as individuals were also liable for their actions. NET lacked the system controls necessary to keep the company liability to a minimum on this issue. Usually with failures such as these, the system internal controls are this company is lacking the most. Ethical behavior among management is key to ethical behavior among employees.