Should Parents Use Genetic Technologies to Choose their Children´s Characteristics?

1732 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Moralsin human genetic engineering

Should parents be allowed to use genetic technologies to choose some of their children’s characteristics? What limits should aply to their selection?

If genetic technologies were available to the general public, would you do it? Would you accept the option of altering the DNA of your unborn child to fit your every whim and desire? Would you only change certain characteristics, or completely 'design' a new born being? Would you really consider that morally ethical or plausible? In this essay I will explore the idea of whether or not parents should be allowed to use genetic technologies to choose some of their children's characteristics and if yes, what limits should apply to their selection.

First of all, to understand the debate at hand here, it is important to have a thorough understanding of what it means for an organism to be genetically modified. A term that is commonly used to describe this process is that of 'genetic engineering'. To genetically engineer something is to manually change the genetic makeup of an organism by adding or removing DNA. This allows us to add any new, desired traits into the organism that were not present or expressed before. In theory, genetic engineering has a lot more advantages in comparison to traditional breeding. Each individual organism can only possess a certain set of traits. Since traditional breeding relies on the mating of two organisms, the offspring is also limited only to what traits already existed between their parents. On the other hand, because genetic engineering involves physically removing the gene from one organism into the other, the list of potential traits an offspring could possess is virtually unlimited. When it comes to genetically modifying human beings, a lot of c...

... middle of paper ...

...s would refer to the parents as having no harmful hereditary diseases or mutations that could be passed down to the child. If genetic engineering was allowed for any purpose other than that, then all we are doing is then altering human beings simply because we desire so. Is it really that necessary for your child to have certain coloured features? Is it really that desirable to have your child possess an IQ of 190 or to never tire physically? I think that it is important to remember that desire is a significant part of human nature. We will always desire what we cannot attain, but if that desire was attainable, it would only result in more far-fetched desires. Society as we know it would cease to exist, but instead consumed by a world obsessed with desire; a determination and a need to reach perfection, a perfection that should otherwise be naturally unattainable.

Show More
Related

  • Ethical Dilemmas of Genetically Engineering Human Embryos

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    A person's individuality begins at conception and develops throughout life. These natural developments can now be changed through genetically engineering a human embryo. Through this process, gender, eye and hair color, height, medical disorders, and many more qualities can be changed. I believe genetically engineering a human embryo is corrupt because it is morally unacceptable, violates the child's rights, and creates an even more divided society.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Beefalo

    709 Words  | 2 Pages

    Usage of genetic modification to pick and chose features and personality traits of embryos could conceivably occur in future times. Wealthy individuals could essentially purchase a baby with built-in genetic advantages (Simmons). Ethically, these seem immoral. Playing God and taking control over the natural way of life makes some understandably uneasy. Ultimately, religious and moral standpoints should play a role in the future of genetic engineering, but not control it. Genetic engineering’s advantages far outweigh the cost of a genetically formulated baby and

    Read More

  • Designer Babies: Disease Free or New Child

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    To choose for their children, the world’s wealthy class will soon have options such as tall, pretty, athletic, intelligent, blue eyes, and blonde hair. Occasionally referred to as similar to “the eugenics of Hitler’s Third Reich” (“Designer Babies” n.p.), the new genetics technology is causing differences in people’s opinions, despite altering DNA before implantation is “just around the corner.” (Thadani n.p.). A recent advance in genetically altering embryos coined “designer babies” produces controversy about the morality of this process.

    Read More

  • Morality In Michael Sandel's The Case Against Perfection

    744 Words  | 2 Pages

    With Dolly, scientists were able to clone her, but she only lived half the age as her mother. Yet, the root was determined, and further studies showed great promise, all with the usage of biotechnology with no immoral harm done to the animals that were utilized for the procedures, without the violation of any rights, such as the right to autonomy. While an opposer to genetic enhancements may say this right is violated because the individual’s future is no longer open, but is it really predetermined? For a parent to choose their child’s genetic makeup, it can be related to easily with a parent to withhold a child’s right to pursuing one thing over another, career-wise or

    Read More

  • Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Enhancement of Human Beings by Julian Savulescu

    3287 Words  | 7 Pages

    Savulescu, Julian. “Genetic Interventions and the Ethics of Human Beings.” Readings in the Philosophy of Technology. Ed. David Kaplan. 2nd ed. Lanham: Roman & Littlefield, 2009. 417-430.

    Read More

  • Genetic Enhancement is Unethical

    1603 Words  | 4 Pages

    Picture a young couple in a waiting room looking through a catalogue together. This catalogue is a little different from what you might expect. In this catalogue, specific traits for babies are being sold to couples to help them create the "perfect baby." This may seem like a bizarre scenario, but it may not be too far off in the future. Designing babies using genetic enhancement is an issue that is gaining more and more attention in the news. This controversial issue, once thought to be only possible in the realm of science-fiction, is causing people to discuss the moral issues surrounding genetic enhancement and germ line engineering. Though genetic research can prove beneficial to learning how to prevent hereditary diseases, the genetic enhancement of human embryos is unethical when used to create "designer babies" with enhanced appearance, athletic ability, and intelligence.

    Read More

  • Designer Babies: What is Ethical?

    992 Words  | 2 Pages

    People should not have access to genetically altering their children because of people’s views on God and their faith, the ethics involving humans, and the possible dangers in tampering with human genes. Although it is many parent’s dream to have the perfect child, or to create a child just the way they want, parents need to realize the reality in genetic engineering. Sometimes a dream should stay a figment of one’s imagination, so reality can go in without the chance of harming an innocent child’s life.

    Read More

  • The Problem with Genetic Enhancement

    1975 Words  | 4 Pages

    In 1913 Teddy Roosevelt, who is considered to be one of the greatest US presidents to serve in office, wrote to the Department of Genetics, “Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind [...]. The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity....” (Dykes, 2008, p. 1). What Teddy Roosevelt was referring to was the idea of enhancing the human population. Today genetic enhancement is paired specifically with technology, but throughout history genetic enhancement has been a very popular but controversial topic. It can be dated back to ancient times when men would pick wives who the men felt would reproduce the best offspring. Then genetic enhancement became extremely popular in the 19th century when Charles Darwin brought the idea of natural selection and eugenics to society. And it is taking new leaps today, where technology is being introduced with genetic enhancement. With this new technology scientists and ethicists are having a hard time trying to find an answer of whether or not this new and growing technology of genetic enhancement should be permitted. We, society, need to analyze the situation very carefully and ask ourselves, should genetic enhancement be allowed in society, or should it not?

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Prenatal Genetic Testing

    729 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the major ethical issues with genetic testing is gene therapy. Gene therapy can modify genes in a child. While being a new procedure and new technology being developed, it is rapidly developing. The question comes up whether if it ethical to genetically alter a child to make he or she better in the aspects of health, intelligence, etc. While gene therapy can help curing diseases, it can potentially be used for increasing intelligence, athletic ability, and attractiveness. According to one survey, the majority believes that gene therapy would be a last resort for treatments as it disrupts gene diversity and it should have mandatory conditions (Robillard et al., 2013), While gene therapy could help children with combating disease and possibly curing their disease, it should not be used to alternate genes for other

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Genetic Modification And Genetic Determinism

    1017 Words  | 3 Pages

    In their research article, “Genetic modification and genetic determinism”, David B. Resnik and Daniel B. Vorhaus argue that all the nonconsequentialist arguments against genetic modification are faulty because of the assumption that all the traits are strongly genetically determined, which is not the case. Resnik and Vorhaus dispel four arguments against genetic modification one-by-one. The freedom argument represents three claims: genetic modification prevents the person who has been modified from making free choices related to the modified trait, limits the range of behaviors and life plans, and interferes with the person 's ability to make free choices by increasing parental expectations and demands (Resnik & Vorhaus 5). The authors find this argument not convincing, as genes are simply not “powerful” enough to deprive a person of free choice, career and life options. In addition to that, they argue that parental control depends not on genetic procedure itself, but rather on parents’ basic knowledge of what the results of the modification should be. In a similar fashion, the giftedness arguments, which states that “Children are no longer viewed as gifts, but as

    Read More

  • Genetic Modification In Brave New World

    1779 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of these moral dilemmas is that genetic engineering changes the traditional dynamic that occurs between the parent and the offspring. This issue arose over the possibility of having a human embryo with three genetic parents which is now possible due to genetic engineering. The procedure in question “involves transplanting the chromosomes from a single-cell embryo or from an unfertilized egg into a donor egg or embryo from which the chromosomes have been removed”(Foht). The procedure itself is very useful for women with mitochondrial disorders but the issue involved with this is that the embryo would technically have three biological parents. There needs to be a real concern about “the way genetic engineering can alter the relationship between the generations from one of parents accepting the novelty and spontaneous uniqueness of their children to one where parents use biotechnology to choose and control the biological nature of their children”(Foht). There is a special relationship between children and their parents that may be disappearing very soon due to these techniques. Children could be born never truly knowing one of their genetic parents. If these procedures continue to prosper people will have to “accept arrangements that split apart the various biological and social aspects of parenthood, and that deliberately create

    Read More

  • Genetic Engineering is Immoral

    423 Words  | 1 Pages

    If a limit is not set between using genetic engineering for treatment and using genetic engineering for enhancement, then many parents could use it purely for eugenic purposes. This could cause ethical concerns but social concerns as well. If this was allowed to occur, it would also give the rich even more advantages than they already have to begin with and drive the social classes even farther apart. The use of genetic engineering may also lead to genetic discrimination. As in the movie Gattaca, a person could easily get a print-out of his or her genotype, this information could then be used by schools, employers, companies, and others; giving rise to a new form of discrimination based on a person’s genetic profile. As the world is already full of discrimination, genetic engineering would even increase the numbers of discrimination against people.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Human Genetic Engineering

    1309 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the rate of advancements in technology and science continue to grow, ideas that were once viewed as science fiction are now becoming reality. As we collectively advance as a society, ethical dilemmas arise pertaining to scientific advancement, specifically concerning the controversial topic of genetic engineering in humans. Human genetic engineering increasingly causes dissonance between various groups of scientific and religious groups of people in regards to if we should or should not ‘play god’ and attempt to modify humans for the better of the race. First, let’s take a look at what exactly genetic engineering is; according to, yourgenome.org, “Genetic engineering refers to the direct manipulation of DNA to alter an organism’s

    Read More

  • Human Genetic Engineering

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Human genetic engineering can provide humanity with the capability to construct “designer babies” as well as cure multiple hereditary diseases. This can be accomplished by changing a human’s genotype to produce a desired phenotype. The outcome could cure both birth defects and hereditary diseases such as cancer and AIDS. Human genetic engineering can also allow mankind to permanently remove a mutated gene through embryo screening, as well as allow parents to choose the desired traits for their children. Negative outcomes of this technology may include the transmission of harmful diseases and the production of genetic mutations.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Genetic Engineering

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    The moral conflicts put aside, the process of genetic engineering is difficult. Changing the proteins in people’s body differently is an unnatural action. Scientists state that genetic engineering only works 50% of the time. Also, when a new gene is placed in the gene code, there will be various mutations that will definitely result in change but may not be for the better.

    Read More

More about Should Parents Use Genetic Technologies to Choose their Children´s Characteristics?

Open Document