Should Normal People Be Able To Have Assault Weapons

500 Words1 Page

Gun Control

Question:
Should normal civilians be able to have assault weapons?

I do not think that people should be allowed to buy military assault weapons. Most of the school. Shootings the shooter has used a military weapon which they should not have been allowed to have. Regular people have no reason to have this type of gun. I do think people should be able to have regular guns for hunting and protecting their family, but should not have the right to get military weapons unless they are protecting our country and not killing our own people.

In an essay written by Nate Bethea (soldier) in the New York Times (nytimes.com) in June 2016, he feels that if you want to shoot an AR so bad you should feel free to join the fight against ISIS in the military. He does not feel that regular people should own assault rifles, because there are too many risks and not enough benefits. He didn’t want to think that we live in a place that is so dangerous that we should need these types of weapons. I agree with his feelings.

According to cnn.com, Americans do have the right to bear arms, but nowhere in the constitution does it say you can have any kind you want. If you need an AK-47 to hunt you probably need to practice shooting. President Obama was right when he said …show more content…

If you think that really need an assault weapon, you probably shouldn’t have one. People saying “I want one”, is not a valid reason to own an assault weapon. Some people argue that they need them in case they need to defend themselves against their own government if necessary. If you are worried about this as a problem, you probably need a good hobby to keep your mind occupied. People do argue that they have the right to have the same types of weapons that could be used against them. The debate could go on and

Open Document