Mental Illness Should mentally ill people be forced into treatment? Those with very serious mental illness, meaning if they are a danger to themselves and others, should be forced into treatment. It will be a benefit for themselves and the people around them. However, those with less serious condition should not be forced into treatment, but should still be encouraged to go through treatment. Voluntary Admission Voluntary admission to a psychiatric hospital occurs in the same was as admission to a hospital. Referral may be made by your doctor. You are not always free to leave psychiatric care when you wish. If you are a voluntary patient who wants to leave a psychiatric center and the doctor considers that you are suffering from a mental disorder, …show more content…
The second consultant must issue a certificate stating that you should be detained because of a mental disorder or must discharge you. If you are detained then you are an involuntary patient and all the procedures relating to information, review and appeal apply in the usual way. Involuntary Admission Under the Mental Act 2001, you may be involuntary admitted and detained in an approved psychiatric Centre if you are suffering from a mental disorder. You may not be admitted because you are suffering from a personality disorder, socially deviant or addicted to drugs or intoxicants. Mental Disorder The Act defines mental disorder as mental illness, severe dementia or significant intellectual disability where: • Because of the illness, disability or dementia, there is serious harm to yourself or to other people or • Because of the severity of the illness, your judgement is so impaired that your condition could get worse if you were not admitted to hospital for treatment that could only be given to you in hospital and going into hospital would be to improve your mental
Psychiatric hospitals, also known as mental hospitals and mental asylums, are hospitals or wards specializing in the treatment of serious psychiatric diseases, such as clinical depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Psychiatric hospitals vary widely in their size and grading. Some hospitals may specialize only in short-term or outpatient therapy for low-risk patients. Others may specialize in the temporary or permanent care of residents who, as a result of a psychological disorder, require routine assistance, treatment, or a specialized and controlled environment. Patients are often admitted on a voluntary basis, but people whom psychiatrists believe may pose a significant danger to themselves or others may be subject to involuntary commitment.
" This improved the treatment of patients but the mentally ill that weren't in this asylum may have
Client stated he "needs to be in a hospital" but does not want to go to a psychiatric hospital. Client advised that he could not live in Simi Valley Hospital and needs further psychiatric
Forcing someone to take medication or be hospitalized against their will seems contrary to an individual’s right to refuse medical treatment, however, the issue becomes complicated when it involves individuals suffering from a mental illness. What should be done when a person has lost their grasp on reality, or if they are at a risk of harming themselves or others? Would that justify denying individuals the right to refuse treatment and issuing involuntary treatment? Numerous books and articles have been written which debates this issue and presents the recommendations of assorted experts.
There were patients who had chronic illnesses and were subdued by restraints and sedation up to 1950s. Moving forward towards the 60’s, the criteria of hospitalization started to change when questions on how well asylums worked and the ethical problems with patient care was raised (West, 2010). Due to the Community Mental Health Centers Act of 1963 these institutions started to close all around the states and shifted away from rural to urban areas. Psychiatric hospitalization had a new criterion stating that an individual had to pose a threat to themselves or others and or show evidence of severe psychiatric illness that renders him or her gravely disabled (Caple,
Involuntary hospitalization is a legal procedure used to require individuals with mental health disorders to receive treatment withoaut their care. I am addressing this topic because there is an enormous problem in the medical field with treatment care. Involuntary health care treatment should not be forced upon because it can cause more harm than damage.
Torture, for weeks, for months, for years, but it is somehow plausible to consider it help. The sane being shoved into a psych ward, drugged, and forced with erroneous treatments, yet this is regarded as the panacea? Mental institutes do not solve everyone’s problems. Forced treatment on the resistive or illegitimate mentally ill exemplifies the need to regain civil rights for patients. The current laws applied to the topic remain not enough to withhold these patients’ civil rights. Also, patients bias court cases while influenced by prescribed drugs. The stories and results of these foul acts are tremendously horrifying. As Americans we are born with our civil rights therefore these persons deserve justice.
Mental illness affects one in four adults every year ("NAMI: National Alliance on Mental Illness | Mental Illnesses"). Mental illness effects thousands who may not even be aware of it. Many who are aware do not receive treatment until something bad happens in result of not receiving treatment. These illnesses affect all aspects of the person’s life. They often do things without the knowledge of what they are doing. Many people who do have these illness commit crimes without the knowledge of the fact that they are doing wrong. People often do not believe that having a mental illness gives people the right to commit a crime, and it doesn’t. It merely suggests that the person who committed said crime was not aware of their actions therefore cannot be held accountable for the wrongdoing. Families of the victims usually are oblivious to what mental illness is and own they do end up educating themselves wondering why these people never got help so their loved one may have been spared. Mentally ill persons should be exempt from the death penalty because they are in a questionable state of mind, they will become low risk if they receive treatment, and the families of the victims do not want them to receive the death penalty.
We all have our own perception of psychiatric hospitals. Some people may see them as a terrifying experience, and others may see them as a way to help people who cannot keep their disorders under control. David Rosenhan's perception led him to a variety of questions. How could psychiatric hospitals know if a patient was insane or not? What is like to be a patient there? According to Rosenhans study, psychiatric hospitals have no way of truly knowing what patients are insane or not; they quickly jump to labeling and depersonalizing their patients instead of spending time with them to observe their personality.
The BBC documentary, Mental: A History of the Madhouse, delves into Britain’s mental asylums and explores not only the life of the patients in these asylums, but also explains some of the treatments used on such patients (from the early 1950s to the late 1990s). The attitudes held against mental illness and those afflicted by it during the time were those of good intentions, although the vast majority of treatments and aid being carried out against the patients were anything but “good”. In 1948, mental health began to be included in the NHS (National Health Service) as an actual medical condition, this helped to bring mental disabilities under the umbrella of equality with all other medical conditions; however, asylums not only housed people
In today’s society, the stigma around mental health has caused many people to fear seeking medical treatment for problems they are dealing with. With an abundance of hateful outlooks and stereotypical labels such as: crazy, psycho, and dangerous, it is clear that people with a mental illness have a genuine reason to avoid pursuing medical treatments. Along with mental health stigma, psychiatric facilities that patients with a mental health issue attend in order to receive treatment obtain an excessive amount of unfavorable stereotypes.
In order to protect the patients’ identity and privacy, and in accordance with the NMC Code (2015) and Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998, anonymity and confidentiality will be maintained using a pseudonym for the case study. Jane, a 47-year-old female, detained on Section 3 of MHA (DH, 1983) within an Acute Inpatient Ward. As defined in the Mental Health Act Code of Conduct (DH, 2007) Section 3 of the MHA allows a patient to be detained for treatment within a hospital setting for a period of up to 6 months to allow for treatment programme (DH, 1983). Jane’s health had deteriorated over a period of seven days, after she had stopped taking her anti-psychotic medication weeks ago, resulting in the current episode of manic behaviour.
According to Szasz (2005), “In principle, the mental patient is considered competent (until proven [otherwise]). In practice, the client is regularly treated as if he were incompetent and the psychiatrist who asserts that he needs treatment is treated as if he were the patient’s guardian” (p.78). During the 1940’s patients who were mentally ill were considered “legally incompetent” when committed into a mental health facility. Relatives of the patients could release them by providing care in their homes for the client. Unfortunately, Szasz (2005) claims, that “the treatment of mental diseases is no more successful today than it was in the past” (p.78).
The Mental Health Act (MHA) is the law which sets out when you can be admitted, detained, and treated in hospitals against your wishes. It is also known as being ‘sectioned’ (Institute of psychiatry, psychology, & neuroscience, 2014). For this to happen, certain people must agree that you have a mental disorder that requires a stay in the hospital (Institute of psychiatry, psychology, & neuroscience, 2014).
Since it has become more understood better treatment plans have been created. There a various therapies and medications that can help manage mental health. However, there is an estimated 50 million people in America that has a mental disorder(s) and sadly only about 10 million will receive mental healthcare. Why is this? This happens simply because mental illness does not care who you are and how much money you do or do not have in the bank. Mental illnesses can effect anyone and it can be anyone of the numerous different psychological disorders. When mental illness effects a person it disrupts their whole life, this would include their daily living as well as effecting how preform at work. Take for instance, if they work a production job it can cause them not to make production. If they cannot function well enough to work at their required performance, then this could and probably would lead into them being fired from their job. Without a job they would not only lose their income but they would also have say bye-bye to their insurance plan as well. This would leave them without and mental healthcare. Did you know that if 50% of those with schizophrenia, 25% of those with anxiety disorders, 33% of those with depression are currently receiving successful treatment and the likely success rate will be around 80 to 90%? A number of people with